“What do you mean by “24 hours to respond to receivership”? Twitter connected? I don’t see your post 50, not on this thread anyway.”
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Sorry... I believe at the time I meant to write “ my post ‘350’”
I was very excited at my first reading of that Q Drop. Without complete data, I submit that my reading interpretation regarding a receivership for twitter from what was posted by Q was plausible.
HOWEVER
To any and all, who may be nervous about inaccurate guesses being posted, let it be known that I regret it..... FWIW however, I was under the impression that we were gathered here to freewheel in bouncing our ideas around.
The error appeared to happen this way:
I was reading what an anon had guessed about a receivership for twitter, but zzeeman in particular has persuaded me, due to the context of dialog on 8 chan, that the probability is that what Q meant was that Snowden was given 24 hours to respond. I’m not sure how twitter enters in, unless it is a twitter expected from Snowden by Q people, or has actually been given by Snowden to Q.
I apologize for the confusion - but in the heat of battle, yes confusion will happen. Be assured I’m doing my best to step aside from creating further confusion.
If the above mea culpa doesn’t do it for someone, you are welcome to come over and help Darlin build the doghouse planned for me.
No sweat one guess is as good as another and people can make up their own mind. If twitter is not about to be in receivership, it should be. JMHO
Most likely it was a deadline for Snowden. I hope they nab him soon, I’m tired of seeing his name.
I hope you are still under that impression, Tex. Of course that is why we are here. Everybody needs to toss out their thoughts, however goofy. I've seen people make the strangest connections which turned out to lead to excellent information.
Hey, even I've been known to be *cough* wr...*choke* wro...ahem....wrong before. Lots, actually.
Keep on keepin on. And you shy lurkers need to chime in too.
Where we go one, we go all.
No doghouse for you.
I think that's a major purpose and benefit of our times together in behalf of The Republic.
Nevertheless, it is evidently also wise to avoid being overly wild in our conjectures and speculations--particularly when we sound emphatically certain about our mere conjectures.
Your good.