To: Melian
The concept of the Internet Bill of Rights does include an advocation of leniency for pedophilia, pedophiles or anything else associated with Podesta, Hillary, Obama or the c i a.
1,304 posted on
03/08/2018 6:02:35 PM PST by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
To: reasonisfaith
1,305 posted on
03/08/2018 6:03:44 PM PST by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
To: reasonisfaith; Melian
What?!
IBOR says pedophilia is ok??? Can I please assume that we are 100% against it then?
1,316 posted on
03/08/2018 6:09:58 PM PST by
generally
( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
To: reasonisfaith
To: reasonisfaith; Melian
The concept of the Internet Bill of Rights does include an advocation of leniency for pedophilia, pedophiles or anything else associated with Podesta, Hillary, Obama or the c i a. I don’t know where you are getting that from. Just as our Constitution’s Bill of Rights does not protect such crimes, neither would a properly drafted Internet Bill of Rights.
Q is supporting the IBOR to prevent the censorship of ideas that is now taking place, especially conservative ideas. It’s not about leniency for pedophiles and criminal activity.
1,555 posted on
03/08/2018 11:52:33 PM PST by
Swordmaker
(My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you racist, bigot!)
To: reasonisfaith
"The concept of the Internet Bill of Rights does include an advocation of leniency for pedophilia"
Huh? What are you talking about?
1,603 posted on
03/09/2018 1:31:55 AM PST by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson