I'm using a Mac and an iPad Pro and although it takes a while, it eventually loads. I think the sites are under quite a load with people trying to get through.
Here you go:
Posted on 02/23/2018 12:05:00 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633864/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
I'm having trouble with the websites I normally access to check for Q drops. For now, Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:
Note that Free Republic does not host links to 8 Chan so if you choose to share such links, please do so using "Private Reply" or FReepmail. Thank you.
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one detailed post. His latest update is here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3633864/posts?page=15#15
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
I still haven’t had a chance to watch the President’s speech at CPAC yet but I caught something while listining to highlights and I’ve found no reference to it in this thread. The Persident was talking about hillary, referencing the “crooked candidate”
“...But we have a very crooked media. We had a crooked candidate, too, by the way. But we have a very, very crooked media.
AUDIENCE: Lock her up! Lock her up! Lock her up!
THE PRESIDENT: I will say this, folks: Everything that’s turning out, now it’s amazing that’s come full circle. Boy, have they committed a lot of atrocities when you look. (Applause.) Right? When you look. Have they done things that are wrong.”
Notice when the President says “boy, have they committed a lot of atrocities...”. Atrocities is a very, very loaded word, much worse than just a reference to ordinary crookedness. Atrocity is at the level of “crimes against humanity”. I don’t believe such language would have been included by accident, in fact it points in the direction of some of the things Q has been hinting at since he came on the scene.
Any thoughts ?
That’s where I am at too. There’s been lots of good questions asked that have led to some well documented answers, and also an awareness of repeating patterns.
20% content would be a friggin gold mine. Typical s/n ratio is more like 1:10,000. These threads are, IMO, exceptionally well disciplined, even the troll-infested threads are fairly rich in content.
'tis the nature of communication and education in this sort of forum, lots of repetition, doubts, giggles and tangents.
Pure guess on my part. Some segment of data comm path is on satellite. Reads like a comm path validation subroutine name. Not an acronym in common use, rather soemthing peculiar to the comm tool Q is using.
Any ideas on /CM? I am thinking check mate.
I don't know how she got so evil...but she did.
Starr clearly had a ton of criminal activities by the Clinton's but chose not to prosecute.
The question is why did they choose not to prosecute?
Who did they have to back them in the prosecution against the Clinton? Not enough support I bet.
As long as Trump is president we may have a better chance this time.
If they fail this time we are simply a banana republic (IE: Corporatist controlled state)
I don't have answers though.
Not the sort of word associated with carelessness with secrets or deliberate leaking. It's at least "dealing with known bad actors."
There you go. A cipher routine gone hinky.
That is never going to happen. IMO, best approach is to be smart in choosing whether and how to interact with opponents.
My post was a direct reply to the idea that it is our responsibility to ignore, rather than the trolls responsibility to stay away from threads they don’t like.
Btw, I do not see trolls as “opponents” they are irritants at best.
The same asswipe that was giving Dana Loesch the business on CNN townhall last night.
Any Law Enforcement type that is for gun control is suspect in my book. And now he's a Hillary crony?
WTF???
I also figure even an authentic messenger is imperfect - sometimes by design. Tricky balance. The mission is to convert a critical mass of the population without ever being associated with the principal. Better to be taken as a fake than to out the boss.
They are opponents of keeping the thread "clean," but I'd let them buy me dinner.
-- My post was a direct reply to the idea that it is our responsibility to ignore, rather than the trolls responsibility to stay away from threads they don't like. --
Everybody is responsible. Playing games with shifting it around is just more noise. Lots of noise of FR. This is a pretty stupid place, IMO. But I do love it. Big hearts for the most part, leans the political way I do, so I chip in (mostly remarks) from time to time. Would be much easier to just lurk.
I am not smart enough to figure it out, even having read the whole page. But someone here might be smart enough. It could also be a tech term. Don’t know anything about that either.
Funny you posted that. I am just now watching the clip on Hannity and that word jump out at me too.
I'm using a Mac and an iPad Pro and although it takes a while, it eventually loads. I think the sites are under quite a load with people trying to get through.
Here you go:
I think it is not too far out to wonder if some of these disruptors are paid/recruited trolls. Or they get a check from their handlers.
There was a disruptor Freeper recently banned (Strac6) who spent half his life on the Q threads. I guess he finally went too far.
As for data transmission integrity, I'm not much of an expert other than understanding rudimentary points.
That’s the ‘second’ shooter, isn’t it. In the bag.
Suicides over this, I could see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.