Posted on 02/21/2018 12:06:33 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner (i.e., personal attacks).
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3633313/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize Q Anon information into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one detailed post. His latest update is here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. Its to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Ill put the link to their general Youtube channel here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
I’ll try and go back through the sequences to see what you’re talking about. I often spring board off of posts in my rants. I want to scan the rest of the responses, first.
Nothing new under the sun.
We’re talkin Cameron Kasky over here
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3634331/posts?page=23
And Nellie Ohr
Taken in the context of the late ‘60’s, early ‘70’s birth control in general and the birth control pill were a big deal.
You have a lot of discernment. I’d trust that. Dr Jerome Corsi, Dustin Nemos, April La June all seem to do an above average job of decoding, commenting on Q-Anon’s stuff.
BAH! there!
I made one original comment on this thread, and that was to the OP. All the rest of my comments are responses to others, who have basically hectored me for daring to post a contrarian view about Q.
I was ‘one and done’, but people couldn’t bring themselves to just let me leave in peace.
You want this to keep going? Keep jumping down my throat for simply expressing my viewpoint.
Well put. Very well put.
CHI St. Joseph Health Grimes Hospital - approx 5 miles away
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Brenham - approx 10 miles. Described as a "Level 4 General Trauma Center"
OK. I commented about your seeming agreement with the more hyper contrarians merely because your stance was more similar to theirs—seemingly—than to mine and the stances of most of us who respect Q-Anon’s efforts so highly. It was merely a matter of you being 51% or more, in my impressions on that side of the divide. I wasn’t saying you were equal to the 95-100% hyper ventilating contrarians. Sorry if I came across that way.
.............................................
Bookmark
..............................................
.............................................
Okay, you don’t have to join D-tube. Just go to the channel and it shows recommended videos for you - based on what you have watched previously.
Dustin has another there - https://d.tube/#!/v/nemosnews/s1f9dlbv
He is there under nemosnews
BTW, sometimes I spring board off of a post by a third party because some of us can hear input better about ourselves when we are overhearing it to a 3rd party.
Mark
Again ... because they MAY have been given clear instructions and warnings that if any rumors surface about them disclosing such, that they’ll be immediately behind bars, too.
Been meaning to look into this, electorals are based on how many house reps we have plus senators... so when they capped house reps at 435 in 1911... they screwed up the 12th amendment. Currently our electoral process should have almost 7000 votes instead of 538.
I doubt they’d be screaming if they were told that if rumors leaked out attributable to them, saying what they were told not to say—that then, they’d be immediately behind bars, too.
I hope I explained sufficiently why I tended to lump you in with others who are skeptical against Q-Anon's stuff. I did not, actually, in my mind, lump you in with the hyper contrarians but merely in the broad group decidedly skeptical against Q-Anon.
I'm characterized as having a lot of fierce pluck but I have not had sex change therapy and am NOT interested in any. My female genitals are fine the way they are. Besides, Qx has enough male fierceness for our household.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.