Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q Anon: Q Anon: (2/16/18) Continued from Wednesday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration
qanonmap.github.io ^ | 2/16/2018 | Q Anon, FReepers

Posted on 02/16/2018 7:47:47 AM PST by ransomnote

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,461-1,476 next last
To: ransomnote
this is not the appropriate place to criticize

If you want to exclude critics and skeptics from your conversations, you need to start your own forum, where you make the rules.

This is Jim Robinson's house, and he's never put any such restrictions on free and open discussion here.

81 posted on 02/16/2018 10:35:35 AM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

The money thing with the playmate story. She says she didn’t say anything before because she’d get sued for 150K by the Enquirer. I’m sure Hillary and a lot of other people would have paid her much more for her troubles if they had only known Hillary was going to lose. Plus she had to throw in that Trump made a racist comment to her about a black friend. Sounds fishy.


82 posted on 02/16/2018 10:39:18 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: meyer; ransomnote
Two key take aways from RR press conference:

1. No Americans were found to be willingly cooperating with any of the indicted parties or schemes.
2. There is no finding that any of the activities had any influence on the outcome of the 2016 election.

But the media will go to town on all of the parts that mention the Trump campaign, and ignore the rest.

83 posted on 02/16/2018 10:39:38 AM PST by zzeeman ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Disestablishmentarian

so what does this mean?


84 posted on 02/16/2018 10:40:48 AM PST by MNDude (This is story is so tragic,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: HombreSecreto

The story sounds fishy,but if it was true, it seems the media has been trying g to stir up marital problems between Donald and Melania for months now.


85 posted on 02/16/2018 10:43:33 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Damifino

Mueller indicts 13 Russians today.Big enough??


86 posted on 02/16/2018 10:45:16 AM PST by COUNTrecount (If only Harvey Weinstein's bathrobe could talk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: meyer; All
Looks like Russia bloggers were an equal opportunity annoyer...
87 posted on 02/16/2018 10:45:18 AM PST by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: meyer

Head-scratch.

So, were they For Him or Against Him?

Sounds like they were making money from both sides to organize rallies.


88 posted on 02/16/2018 10:48:11 AM PST by truthluva ("Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking"..J.C. Watts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: meyer

They charged that some Russians didn’t disclose who they were and approached some “unwitting” Trump campaign people. This sounds like an exoneration of the Trump campaign.
Hillary campaign, OTOH, “witting”?


89 posted on 02/16/2018 10:48:28 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Thank you for the link.

The Deep State "narrative" for the day (Russia Russia Russia) doesn't make much sense. Supposedly, the Russians were paid to disparage Hillary and build up Trump.

There's SO MUCH the Russians had to work with to disparage Hillary and somehow it never made it to the public. Every day I learn more about Hillary's crimes I hadn't heard of before. A FReeper just sent me a link I'll pass along here. It's about Hillary's private server - it outlines technical details and then at the 8 minute mark explains how Hillary, as acting Sec of State, established the equivalent of an espionage center with her blackberry, secret file server and her (false) claims that she doesn't know how to use a computer.

Hillary Clinton – "NO INTENT"?(rnote: Hillary's version of "it depends on what your definition of "is" is.)

What about all the research available to you and me right now documenting Hillary's links to child trafficking? Did that ever inspire public attention? Did the Russia disinfo focus attention on that? Haiti? Hillary's epic fraud and theft of Haitian relief money? People have been documenting that stuff for years. The Russians could have leaked Benghazi, Uranium One.....wait....wait.....Hillary benefited Russia and sabotaged US security with Uranium One. Russia would like that to keep happening. Trump won't let that happen. Russia never wanted to lose pay to play with Hillary.

During the time Russia supposedly talked up Trump, Trump was taking quite the beating. ANything and everything that could be said about him negatively was - in addition to made up stories (Dossier) and ridiculously slanted coverage (95%).

I'm curious to know what feeble "praise" the Russians supposedly disseminated re Trump. The MSM was certain Trump would lose and Hillary's supporters themselves were weeping with shock the night of the election because everything they read and saw on social media and the MSM told them she would win.

SO there's reality, and there's the latest response from the Deep State to try to overthrow our duly elected government.

90 posted on 02/16/2018 10:52:56 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

bookmark


91 posted on 02/16/2018 11:11:15 AM PST by PrivateIdaho ( "Courage is being scared to death... but saddling up anyway." (John Wayne))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Also, Twitter happily shadow-bans criticism of Hillary or conservative opinion, so had Russian scammers posted negative things about Hillary, it would have been shadow-banned.


92 posted on 02/16/2018 11:16:20 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: gnarledmaw

Totally agree, FR used to be more focused.


93 posted on 02/16/2018 11:19:24 AM PST by slag (reelect nobody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: All
For those who haven't seen it yet, here's a link to an FR thread I found interesting (and infuriating):

CIA Argues The Public Can’t See Classified Information It Has Already Given To Favored Reporters

94 posted on 02/16/2018 11:25:23 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

What proofs have been provided? I’m very curious about that statement.


95 posted on 02/16/2018 11:31:41 AM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Anyone with access to that securedrop thing that the media apparently uses? Would be interesting to see how much they’ve strategically “leaked” to influence the public.


96 posted on 02/16/2018 11:32:08 AM PST by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

To a degree, Q sort of farms out research with his questions.


97 posted on 02/16/2018 11:38:16 AM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zzeeman
While I have been more or less a defender of Q, this has to be viewed as a bad week for him/them. If Q is legit, he/they need to kick it up a notch. The veracity of Q is being questioned outside FR, as well.
98 posted on 02/16/2018 11:38:21 AM PST by Major Matt Mason (The U.S. Senate - where American freedom goes to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

There are some interesting tidbits here, https://www.thecipherbrief.com/dead-drop

and here, https://www.thedailybeast.com/us-intelligence-shut-downs-damning-report-on-whistleblower-retaliation?ref=scroll by Kevin Poulsen
C.Y.A.
U.S. Intelligence Shuts Down Damning Report on Whistleblower Retaliation
A top watchdog investigated 190 cases of alleged retaliation against whistleblowers—and found that intelligence bureaucrats only once ruled in favor of the whistleblower.”

Those in charge at the alphabet agencies are none too fond of whistleblowers.


99 posted on 02/16/2018 11:46:26 AM PST by azkathy (We the people are FED UP-pun intended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Ah but Sheppy on Fox news is setting up for his 3pm show today and already twisting the words and saying the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians.

I wish he was off Fox!


100 posted on 02/16/2018 11:48:10 AM PST by Faith65 (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,461-1,476 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson