Q Anon #696: (2/9/18)

qcodefag.github.io/ ^ | 2/9/2018 | Q Anon

[ransomnote]

#696

Feb 9 2018 18:06:34

Q

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

[Next week]

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

We warned you.

You are stupid.

Can you sleep?

We can help.

Q

[little jeremiah]

Thank you muchly.

[WildHighlander57]

Steven W.

Thanks for posting this; there is precedent for what may need to be done.

[ransomnote]

That list is as beautiful as it is helpful! Wonderful!
I am in the process of converting my profile page to a resources page (collection of Q thread links will be stored there). I see that YOU aren’t using your profile page. Ermmmm....would you consider storing and maintaining your list there too? I like it on the thread but if I knew it was there I could include links in the POST #1 under new threads? Your info is so helpful - thanks!

[bagster]

Awesome list, Swordy. Good work.

I second the motion that it should be attached as a link to all original Q posts.

[little jeremiah]

Shit, looks like someone’s trying to hack Q.

How so? The Red October reference?

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Bkmrk.

[LuvFreeRepublic]

Q drop 721, Red October was a cyber hack/malware issue that gathered info for at least 5 years. . Sounds like Q is saying they are no longer looking for the hackers, thus the dropping of ‘The Hunt For’. Did they find responsible parties? Would Assange’s encription key that he dropped in January have been access to who was responsible for Red October and/or Info Red October gathered? Assange dropped the key, but no file was ever released. In the past, key gets dropped, then file gets posted.

[madison10]

Guess we are going to have to disagree.

[little jeremiah]

I was referring (in the comment you are replying to) just about the military parade maybe being proposed to quell the local US (and imported jihadi) bad guys... are we cross purposing? :-)

I really should just read these threads and not pipe up.

[ransomnote]

Q Ping

Q drop #720 not posted as it is only a security test “Sec Test”.

Q drop #721 at link below.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3630912/posts?page=1520#1520

[bagster]

Note "The Hunt For" was dropped.
Details matter.

Q

I believe this is in keeping with my theory that the actual subrarine is the turning over of assets from the bad guys to the good guys. Not the actual "Hunt" itself.

The asset being people like "Dopey" Prince Alaweed (turned) and possibly others we don't know about and those we are attempting to "Red October."

I am satisfied with my theory until convince otherwise.

[Cboldt]

What Supreme Court case allows for the use of MI v Congressional assembled and approved agencies?

I don't know the cases involving use of military intelligence, but a quick review causes me to recommend a good summary at "Laird v. Tatum and Article III Standing in Surveillance Cases" by Jeffrey L. Vagle

Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1 (1972); and Clapper v. Amnesty International.

Before finding that, I would have guessed United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972) [the "Keith" case] and US v. Truong Dinh Hung Truong, 629 F.2d 908 (4th Cir. 1980) cases.

The Keith and Truong cases don't specifically note military intelligence, but they do stand for the proposition that no warrant, hence no court, hence no alphabet agency need to be involved, depending on the purpose of the investigation.

If foreign agents are using the DNC and the alphabet agencies to subvert the presidency, there is a definite "foreign intelligence" component.

The Hamdan case was post capture and dealt with the legitimacy and applicability of military tribunals.

[ransomnote]

Q Ping

Q drop #720 not posted as it is only a security test “Sec Test”.

Q drop #721 at link below.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3630912/posts?page=1520#1520

[bagster]

I think we might be cross purposing, Jeremiah. Sorry.

And don't you dare stop piping up. Everybody, especially me, needs the piping up of EVERYBODY to make us think, connect dots, and trigger things we either don't know or have forgotten.

Piping up is important.

I'm just stuck on the "Red October" thing at the moment.

[AndyJackson]

Great work. Thanks.

[Rusty0604]

This is great! Thank you.

[RoosterRedux]

Red October is also another name for the Bolshevik Revolution in October, 1917 Russia.

[TexasMeme]

Welcome fellow newbie! 😊

[Steven W.]

well, well - look what you've written - and consider:

Those not in the know do not know ... and to other post(s) above, there are lots of meanings that go across each other, reinforce each other, substantiate each other.

in the case of the parade story - where did that come from? Did Sarah Sanders pitch in press beating? No. It surfaced somewhere and was fed to +/- by the media with accompanying narrative that it shows Trump's a dictator, etc., etc..

I first considered pitched by deep state ala the Porter resignation aimed at disruption and taking out Gen. Kelly. It also serves as distraction or possible leak outings or covering accompanying resignation. But you note another possible implication or purpose being to accompany any possible activity here in homeland ala people may see operations ongoing and dismiss ala 'must be parade preparations' ... TBD ;)

[RoosterRedux]

Red October is another name for the Bolshevik/Communist Revolution in Russia in Oct, 1917.