Skip to comments.
LITTLE BARBIES: SEX TRAFFICING OF YOUNG GIRLS
zerohedge ^
| 2/08/2018
| Tyler Durden, John Whitehead
Posted on 02/07/2018 7:31:43 PM PST by greeneyes
Little Barbies: Sex Trafficking Of Young Girls Is America's Dirty Little Secret
Authored by John Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute,
Theyre called the Little Barbies. Children, young girlssome as young as 9 years oldare being bought and sold for sex in America. The average age for a young woman being sold for sex is now 13 years old. This is Americas dirty little secret.
According to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, Children are being targeted and sold for sex in America every day.
Sex traffickingespecially when it comes to the buying and selling of young girlshas become big business in America, the fastest growing business in organized crime and the second most-lucrative commodity traded illegally after drugs and guns.
As investigative journalist Amy Fine Collins notes, Its become more lucrative and much safer to sell malleable teens than drugs or guns.
Consider this: every two minutes, a child is exploited in the sex industry....On average, a child might be raped by 6,000 men during a five-year period of servitude.
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: littlebarbies; pedo; pedogate; pedophilia; trafficking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-126 last
To: Yaelle
“Agreed, but not everyone listens to Him!”
Too soon old; too late wise.
121
posted on
02/08/2018 5:25:27 PM PST
by
dsc
(Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
To: Yaelle
Oh!
You’re in for a ride the next two decades!
122
posted on
02/09/2018 5:03:29 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: greeneyes
and the second most-lucrative commodity traded illegally after drugs and guns.
Huh? wouldn't that make it the third most lucrative commodity? Did this article have an editor?
To: Svartalfiar
Well, yes and no. If one adds the guns and drugs together and states that is the most lucrative then human trafficking is second. However it was meant, it is not clear, so criticism is well founded.
Newspapers in this day and age would not have made it past our high school student editor, let along the Journalism Teacher and sponsor.
To: Crucial
Its not just a ring - its a way of life in HW.
125
posted on
02/10/2018 1:50:19 AM PST
by
x_plus_one
( I pray Gods eyes may once again gaze upon me and remind me that I am still His child.)
To: greeneyes
Well, yes and no. If one adds the guns and drugs together and states that is the most lucrative then human trafficking is second. However it was meant, it is not clear, so criticism is well founded.
Newspapers in this day and age would not have made it past our high school student editor, let along the Journalism Teacher and sponsor.
Well, the way I said it is the only way that makes sense to me. Drugs and guns are pretty clearly each their own separate category. If drugs and/or guns are, say, #1 and #3, then why combine them? Just say the trafficking is #2 after whichever is #1. OR, if drugs/guns are #2 and #3, but combine to #1, why not just say trafficking is #1?
But I agree, journalism standards have sharply fallen. Over half the articles I read have some kind of spelling or grammatical mistake in them. Missed by the 'journalist', his proofreader, and the editor. There's a couple articles I've seen that I thought came out of Google translate, they were so bad...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-126 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson