Thanks to SunkenCiv for the heads up.
To: Swordmaker
Look for the lawsuits soon after claiming Intel used AMD technology for it’s chips.
2 posted on
11/11/2017 2:27:15 PM PST by
Azeem
(There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury and ammo.)
To: dayglored; ShadowAce; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; 5thGenTexan; AbolishCSEU; Abundy; Action-America; ...
Intel grabs AMD's chief of graphics to head its department of graphic Processor design. . . This should make things more interesting in the future of graphic processor competition. PING!

Cross Platform Graphic Processor
Ping!
The latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword "ApplePingList" on FreeRepublic's Search.
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me
3 posted on
11/11/2017 2:29:25 PM PST by
Swordmaker
(My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you racist, bigot!)
To: Swordmaker
Apparently AMD did not make this engineer sign a non complete
clause in his contract. Should have been for at least 3-4 years.
4 posted on
11/11/2017 2:29:27 PM PST by
tennmountainman
("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small fee.)
To: Swordmaker
I read something interesting earlier today about shares in graphics processor companies being inflated due to cryptocurrency mining and that the deflation of Bitcoin combined with increased rewards on mining has caused a decrease in demand.
I’m not sure if that is an accurate assessment, but apparently amongst crypto miners, there is widespread use of GPUs to do the processing.
Take it for what it is worth, I don’t know enough about either GPUs or crypto to hash (pun intended) whether or not it is true.
6 posted on
11/11/2017 2:30:22 PM PST by
refreshed
(But we preach Christ crucified... 1 Corinthians 1:23)
To: Swordmaker
Buy NVDA on ANY weakness. It is riding the BitCoin wave to $25,000
7 posted on
11/11/2017 2:40:45 PM PST by
montag813
To: Swordmaker
So AMD hasn’t been able to compete with Intel in CPU’s, and hasn’t been able to compete with nVidia in GPU’s. So bringing this guy in obviously hurts AMD, but helps Intel how exactly? Maybe with Intel’s money he can do more? I’m lost on this one. I think this is more about Intel trying to protect their CPU business and (maybe) upgrade their crap integrated graphics.
11 posted on
11/11/2017 4:16:39 PM PST by
motor_racer
(Who will bell the cat?)
To: Swordmaker
To: Swordmaker
The news I read this week regarding AMD and Intel, was that they were forming a partnership to produce a chip combining Intel processors with AMD graphics technology, to produce a single processor, which is an area that Nvidia cannot compete in.
Intel and AMD team up against Nvidia to produce a new laptop chip
https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/6/16612048/intel-amd-partnership-nvidia-laptop-chip
That sounds different from what Swordmaker wrote above.
14 posted on
11/11/2017 5:01:26 PM PST by
adorno
To: Swordmaker
AMD is lagging behind NVIDIA when it comes to discrete video cards. Not sure how big of a news this is. Now when it comes to integrated APU’s AMD definitely has a leg up on Intel’s week offerings.
20 posted on
11/11/2017 6:07:33 PM PST by
DAC21
To: Swordmaker
Some are saying that the recently-announced JV between Intel and AMD is to produce a CPU/GPU combo for upcoming MacBooks.
Do you think that there is anything to that?
To: Swordmaker
My pleasure. AMD, Nvidia, and Intel are a bit like these characters:

24 posted on
11/12/2017 12:03:15 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson