Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Uranium One, Jeff Sessions, and Fusion GPS
Thread Reader ^ | November 4, 2017 | StealthJeff @DrawandStrike

Posted on 11/04/2017 8:59:18 AM PDT by ChocChipCookie

Thread Reader is happy to present an unrolled Twitter story with 67 tweets.

#UraniumOne #FusionGPS

1) This started either before Trump announced his run for President, or soon thereafter. Someone who knew what happened told him.

2) SOMEONE in the IC, likely military intel, sat Trump down & laid out the entire #UraniumOne bribery scheme.

3) How all across the breadth of the Obama Administration people in high offices took massive bribes to facilitate sell of uranium to Russia

4) It involved so many people, it compromised so many agencies, the people who did it counted on it never being exposed or prosecuted.

5) The lengths to which they corrupted our government offices to enrich themselves by selling out our country virtually ENSURED they'd walk.

6) People knew but nobody could talk, the people involved in the scheme were at the HIGHEST levels of the American government.

7) So patriots in our gov't had their hands tied. There was nothing they could do to stop the sale.

8) Even after SOME of the dirty facts behind #UraniumOne became known in 2015, it was easily buried, ignored, passed by.

9) Somebody took a chance on Trump. They sat him down, walked him through what happened.

Ponder the impossible task being revealed.

10) Even if he WINS the election, he'd be taking over a gov't that had been corrupted & compromised by the previous administration to a

11) degree that was almost unfathomable.

HOW do you go about restoring the US gov't to what it should be, instead of what it's become?

12) And Trump and his advisors came up with a plan.

A brilliant plan. An intelligence operation based on DECEPTION.

13) It started during the primaries when Trump began taking every opportunity he could to brag about what GOOD FRIENDS he'd be with Putin.

14) Trump literally could not seem to SHUT UP about how awesomely AWESOME his relationship with Putin was gonna be.

15) It became a running joke, a campaign feature, engendering much hand wringing & concern among Never Trumpers, including me at the time.

16) WHY does Trump keep going out of his way to incessantly BRAG about the sweet, sweet deals he & Putin are gonna do together? 🤔

17) But go back and look. During the primaries, during the general election campaign, what happened EVERY TIME Trump did this Putin act?

18) He *literally* trolled all the people who took dirty Russian $ to compromise our nat'l security into ATTACKING HIM FOR IT.

19) And all HE was doing was TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING HE HADN'T DONE YET and would NEVER really do.

20) Literally ever single time Trump talked about his good friend Vladimir, Hillary 'reminded' him Putin is...NOT our ally!

21) Obama condescendingly chided Trump for his friendly talk about Putin. Holder was aghast, Lynch was stunned! etc.

22) They fell right into his trap. He TALKED about doing deals with a guy ALL THESE TRAITORS TOOK BRIBES FROM TO SELL URANIUM TO.

23) He's talking about hypothetical deals with Russia & people who took massive Russian bribes on the U1 deal rushed to ATTACK HIM for it.

24) What possible EXCUSE are they going to have when the truth comes out?

They're not going to have one. He made SURE of that.

25) Everything Trump does is calculated for effect.

So now you know why he showed all that 'Putin-Love' during the campaign.

26) The traitors had no idea what he was really doing & rushed to attack him for merely TALKING about doing deals with Russia.

27) Then Trump won the election. He and Sessions went to work.

Now here's something people overlook or don't understand.

Pay attention

28) All this stuff about #UraniumOne we're now just finding out? Trump & Sessions knew about ALL OF THIS before they were sworn in.

29) Part of the intelligence operation Trump & Co. are running is you never show what you know, you keep your enemy in the dark.

30) Trump & Sessions knew about ALL the details of #UraniumOne BEFORE the election.

Who got how much, from who, all of it.

31) How much uranium was being shipped to Moscow, who facilitated that shipping, they already KNOW all of this.

32) They just haven't TALKED about until now. They PRETEND they are just now becoming aware of some of this stuff.

33) There was NO WAY they were going to come into office in January & tip all these people off "Yeah hey we're going after #UraniumOne!"

34) Trump & Sessions know what happened with #UraniumOne. All the dark, dirty details. START with that premise, replay the last 9 months.

35) You need to start an investigation where somebody deep dives into #UraniumOne BUT you can't let anybody outside KNOW that.

36) So here's where the second part of the intelligence operation begins.

You convince people it's TRUMP & HIS TEAM being investigated.

37) All the traitors who facilitated the #UraniumOne deal were on high alert after the transfer of power. Will they be sniffed out?

38) Well not to worry. Almost IMMEDIATELY the new President & his team end up being embroiled in a very public scandal.

39) Trump asks Comey to back off of Flynn, then fires Comey, who leaks memos to the NYT's & DEMANDS appointment of a Special Counsel.

40) With a President who bragged about doing deals with Russia, an advisor caught on the phone with the Russian ambassador.....

41) ...everybody AGREES: yeah, great idea! Let's appoint a special counsel to investigate RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE in our election! So be it.

42) Jeff Sessions then recuses himself from the Russian investigation. [But remember: HE ALREADY KNOWS EVERYTHING ANYWAY]

43) Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein then appoints Bob Mueller & tasks him with investigation Russian interference in the 2016 election.

44) MUELLER AND ROSENSTEIN *both* already know that Trump & Sessions BOTH know all the details of #UraniumOne.

Got that?

45) Everybody involved in this ALREADY KNOWS. Everybody was in on this from the start. Trump, Sessions, Mueller & Rosenstein.

47) A lot of scenarios go wrong because they start by assuming Trump was clueless, didn't know any of this, Sessions didn't either or

48) was part of the #UraniumOne coverup. Same with Mueller & Rosenstein, whom many assume to be dirty, trying to HIDE the evidence.

49) An intelligence operation based on deception calls for putting the enemy at EASE because they don't understand what you're REALLY doing.

50) So: what do the #UraniumOne traitors & DNC Media & Democrats THINK has been going on for the last 8 moths?

51) Trump has been STAGGERING on the ropes in desperate trouble trying to avoid a KNOCKOUT BLOW as Mueller relentlessly stalks him!

52) The reality? Mueller has been digging even deeper into #UraniumOne & into #FusionGPS & the Trump dossier.

53) He *has* found Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Do you know what it was?

Shall I tell you?

54) He found a MASSIVE Russian bribery scheme involving 1 of the Presidential candidates in which she compromised US nat'l security.

55) He *also* found this selfsame candidate illegally funding solicitation of info from Russian gov't sources to smear the OTHER candidate.

56) And to compound THAT offense, this candidate also tried to HIDE her funding of this dossier by using a law firm, which is illegal.

57) The investigation is mostly over. Most of the indictments from the grand jury/juries have been made, sealed.

58) You're all about to witness something that was deemed to be an impossibility.

59) A previous administration that was so corrupt across so many agencies with so many people involved, it made it invincible....

60) is about to be rolled up.

Dozens of people are going to prison. And you know most of the names.

61) Not until the hammer actually falls & all the indictments are unsealed will most people figure out what Trump & his team did.

62) DNC Media never had a chance to compromise/thwart the investigation of #UraniumOne & #FusionGPS because they fell for the COVER STORY.

63) It's literally too late at this point to stop what's coming. That window closed weeks ago.

64) Examples will be made out of these people. When Trump & Sessions are done, NO ONE will ever try this kind of treason again.

/end.

40a)...and who briefly for 3 months hired a guy known to be 1 of the SLIMIEST and DIRTIEST Russian-connected people in DC as his manager.

40b) [of course, now we know after the election it was actually JARED KUSHNER running the campaign behind the scenes]

40c) while Kelly Anne Conway was handling the public PR & media chores.

Manafort was brought in as ANOTHER reason to investigate Trump!


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: agsessions; clinton; fusiongps; lynch; putin; uraniumone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last
To: FreeReign

Seems to me his is saying he is recused. Its not his decision


81 posted on 11/04/2017 11:02:57 AM PDT by RummyChick (I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

.
Without question, he was a Clinton plant, and not the only one.
.


82 posted on 11/04/2017 11:09:45 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Sessions: I recused myself not because of any asserted wrongdoing on my part during the campaign, but because a Department of Justice regulation, 28 CFR 45.2, required it....That regulation states, in effect, that department employees should not participate in investigations of a campaign if they have served as a campaign advisor.

More good links from you, thanks. When I first saw Sessions state this, and I have seen most if not all of his his statements before Congress live, I begrudgingly admitted there may be precedent for his recusal from matters related TO THE CAMPAIGN, just as he said above. Now, his recusals seem to have expanded to anything to do with Clintons, which the regulation he cited does not require.

Based on what we've seen, Sessions is essentially AWOL from his responsibilities as AG. And the power seems to have been delegated to Rosenstein, who has a questionable history of possibly not reporting Uranium One bribery etc up the chain when it was being debated by Congress/CFIUS etc. And according to Nunes, the DoJ has still been trying to suppress the evidence of possible wrongdoing to their very own oversight committee. Right now Nunes and Trump have my ear, not people in the DoJ or glory hounds on twitter.

83 posted on 11/04/2017 11:10:01 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Seeking the Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Not sure what you are saying.

But Sessions is saying two different things.

Back in January, Sessions said that he is required not to participate in cases where there is a conflict of interest.

But now recently, Sessions is saying that not participating in a case where there is a conflict of interest, is optional and the decision left up to the individual, in this case Rosenstein.

It's apparent to me, when it comes to recusals and draining the swamp, Sessions will always rationalize the easiest route.

84 posted on 11/04/2017 11:11:56 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Back in January, Sessions said that he is required not to participate in cases where there is a conflict of interest. But now recently, Sessions is saying that not participating in a case where there is a conflict of interest, is optional and the decision left up to the individual, in this case Rosenstein.

Great point, again. Unequal justice, direct per Sessions.

85 posted on 11/04/2017 11:15:49 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Seeking the Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

I am saying its not sessions decision because he is recused. Its rosenstein decision that should be based on the law

As in..its a decision someone makes. It cant be sessions making decision


86 posted on 11/04/2017 11:16:28 AM PDT by RummyChick (I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: bigbob; ChocChipCookie

.
Analysis has to be reserved to those with knowledge and understanding of Post Reagan US History.

The things in play began in 1988, and unfolded with the failure of socialism in the USSR.

It was the filling of that vacuum that we are presently dealing with, and not terribly well.
.


87 posted on 11/04/2017 11:16:38 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

.
The law affects Rosenstein differently than it affects Sessions, because Sessions was a part of the TRump campaign.

Not “unequal justice” at all.
.


88 posted on 11/04/2017 11:19:23 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“There are plenty of things to prosecute Hillary for...”

And yet nothing is being done.


89 posted on 11/04/2017 11:23:51 AM PDT by JPJones (Who is FOR tariffs? George Washington, Ronald Reagan and Me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Not true, if the investigation proves money was siphoned to the Clintons and their crooked Fund, there’s a lot of illegal here.


90 posted on 11/04/2017 11:26:25 AM PDT by Fireone (Lock Her Up! (and 100 of her accomplices))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

There is section on recusals and the procedure for said recusals for DOJ in their rules


91 posted on 11/04/2017 11:27:44 AM PDT by RummyChick (I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

The reasons for the requirement of the recusal due to conflict of interest clause are different, but it is still a different application of that same conflict of interest clause. Ergo unequal justice.


92 posted on 11/04/2017 11:32:40 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Seeking the Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

It is not an automatic kick in of law with no further action required.

See recusal laws and procedures on doj website


93 posted on 11/04/2017 11:48:33 AM PDT by RummyChick (I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
I am saying its not sessions decision because he is recused. Its rosenstein decision that should be based on the law As in..its a decision someone makes. It cant be sessions making decision

I would think that the rules are the rules. Sessions even used the word "required", when talking about himself and why he is no longer involved.

And I would think that Rosenstein (and Mueller) are required to be recused and it's not a matter if it being their choice, as Sessions implies.

And I would think that it's their supervisor Sessions, who is responsible for making that happen.

94 posted on 11/04/2017 11:53:35 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
The law affects Rosenstein differently than it affects Sessions, because Sessions was a part of the TRump campaign. Not “unequal justice” at all.

Rosenstein was the lead prosecutor in the ~2015 Uranium One prosecution and plea deals.

Yes unequal justice.

95 posted on 11/04/2017 11:56:32 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

I really dont understand your point. It seems you think it is an automatic kick in with no decisions that have to be made

Please go read recusal procedure


96 posted on 11/04/2017 11:57:55 AM PDT by RummyChick (I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Fireone

Nothing in “Uranium One” is illegal.

The “siphoning” is completely separate from Uranium One. (and way older in origin)
.


97 posted on 11/04/2017 11:58:42 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
See recusal laws and procedures on dos website

I've seen the list and it's a mile long. Previous involvement in a case that's being re-investigated could/should definitely apply, especially the lead investigator, as Rosenstein was.

98 posted on 11/04/2017 12:02:22 PM PDT by Golden Eagle (Seeking the Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
One aspect that doesn't seem to be considered is that Hillary is innocent; that the Clintons have just been nationally polarizing figures due to their stature and respect among progressives.

That would explain why there isn't any serious concern about conducting an investigation since their infractions are presumed to be primarily political in nature. It would also support her assertion about continual 'trumped' up charges driven by the VRWC and commercial conservative sites like FR.

And finally, it would explain why never-Trumpers, the Bushs and other GOPe stalwarts didn't/won't support Trump: he exploited these kinds of dirty & misleading innuendo and rumors to fuel his own narcissistic desires for power, fame & glory.

***

Hmm, don't like that scenario? Think perhaps the Clintons and entire deep state apparatus are actually guilty of wide-scale corruption, sedition & treason? Then, wouldn't it be then logical to conclude that if these charges are true, Sessions - by not prosecuting or resigning; and Trump, by not firing & replacing Sessions, are both guilty of:

- dereliction of duty
- desertion of post
- cowardice in the face of the enemy

To make matters worse, Trump callously mentioned to a gold star wife that her husband "knew what he signed up for". Isn't that the height of crassness coming from someone who is himself personally afraid to risk his position & reputation? That is, Trump - as president - declining to pursue serious, actionable crimes against the country. Whereas it's completely expected that a soldier should give his very life in sacrifice to simply gain a (temporary) tactical position?

As you can see, none of this makes sense. You either have to believe Clinton is innocent, or think Sessions/Trump are the worst kinds of hypocrites & cowards, if something isn't actually going down behind the scenes.

99 posted on 11/04/2017 12:03:21 PM PDT by semantic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Okeydoker

.
Steer clear of “Conservative Nuthouse”
.


100 posted on 11/04/2017 12:03:35 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson