Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeReign

Seems to me his is saying he is recused. Its not his decision


81 posted on 11/04/2017 11:02:57 AM PDT by RummyChick (I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick
Not sure what you are saying.

But Sessions is saying two different things.

Back in January, Sessions said that he is required not to participate in cases where there is a conflict of interest.

But now recently, Sessions is saying that not participating in a case where there is a conflict of interest, is optional and the decision left up to the individual, in this case Rosenstein.

It's apparent to me, when it comes to recusals and draining the swamp, Sessions will always rationalize the easiest route.

84 posted on 11/04/2017 11:11:56 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson