Posted on 10/23/2017 1:10:07 PM PDT by sparklite2
“Men are visually stimulated and unwanted stimulation should meet the basic definition of assault,” Shoesmith said, asserting that women who dress in a suggestive manner are “guilty of indecent visual assault on a man’s imagination, which does cause mental anguish and torment.”
“When a man sees a naked or partially dressed woman, a chemical reaction happens in his brain,” he continued. “Neurotransmitters like dopamine and serotonin are released, giving him an involuntary surge of pleasure. Notice the word ‘involuntary’ … Men are in a state of constant sexual assault by women who either don’t understand the severity of what they are doing, because it’s cute and they like the attention, or worse, they do know the feelings it stirs and like the control they have over men.”
Gallups agreed, saying that if a man were to parade around the workplace “in a very sexually suggestive outfit,” women would immediately file sexual harassment claims. He demanded to know, therefore, “why wouldn’t it be sexual assault” when a woman does it.
(Excerpt) Read more at rightwingwatch.org ...
We are DEVO?
..don’t look Ethel ........ it was too late....
Being provoked merely by how a woman is dressed means one is merely an ignorant, crude savage unable to control their reactions. It’s as bad as the stupid snowflakes who get offended by mere words.
*ONLY* actions matter, at least with adult humans; any woman can dress any way she wants and I’ll be the first to slowly castrate any adult male who makes an issue of it tries to use it as any sort of justification of any action.
I’m not complaining.....
CC
She *was* asking for it. Just not from you.
(See the sexual harassment training video from Saturday Night Live, with Tom Brady for more details.)
I control what assaults my senses, short of things such as flash-bangs or careening drivers which invoke ‘fight or flight’. Oh yeah, maybe really strong perfume, but how people dress, the mere words they use? the artwork they create or display- anyone who has an issue with those is just a subhuman beast unless the words are a direct threat.
I hope this little snowflake never goes to the beach. It might put him in the hospital.
No pastor is allied with Trump. And why the f*** did the media deliberately and intentionally suppress the fact that bammy attended a White-hating “church” for 20 years?
At the biological level, he is right. That is, like many animals, female humans are *compelled* to “display”, and males are *compelled* to pay attention to those displays.
You might even imagine David Attenborough nature show narration for it.
However, human have, or had, a very good means of overcoming this biological imperative. That is, socially enforced marriage. It gives advantages to women, men and definitely to their children.
Males are compelled to want to distribute their DNA to as many offspring, by as many females, as possible. Females are compelled to both get the best male DNA for their offspring, *as well as* the best “provider male” to help her raise them.
Socially enforced marriage advantages the male by helping to insure his children are his. It advantages his wife, by helping to insure that her husband remains to help her raise them. And the children benefit a lot.
But marriage *must* be socially enforced. That is, everyone must agree to keep their hands off married couples, to the point that even cheating is strongly discouraged.
It does create requirements. The first is that before marriage, females must be protected from rogue males, because this could interfere with her loyalty to her husband, and also her ability to bear children.
Yet socially enforced marriage has two weak points. The first is the dowry, in which a bride is sold to her husband. This means there is no mutual attraction, and often a poor age match between the two. Not good for producing children.
The second is when society refuses to enforce the marriage. It makes the couple a target to sexual interlopers, makes it easy to divorce, and otherwise fouls the system.
A very well demonstrated subject by certain groups to raise the ranks of 'welfare mommas' to 'rich beyoches' riding the single momma entitlement baby train.
While there’s no such thing as “asking for it”, there is such a thing as a dramaticly higher probability, based on some guys’ reflexes, which may be criminal.
Oh, good. Finally, I can be a victim.
Consider the concept of Pandering, making criminal use of someone’s weakness. The user is always guilty.
And I know what I want in reparations.
If there was a camera on you, would you still say that?
Well yes, that’s the hwd culture. But some few resist it.
What I meant was that some subjects are irresistible fodder for threads.
Haha, in a perfect world, but in a perfect world it would not be necessary.
Some women dress “lively” when they feel safe, in terms of expectations of others’ reasonable behaviour. Of course, sometimes that confidence is misplaced. Outliers need to be scorned, not humped.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.