Posted on 07/26/2017 1:45:28 PM PDT by Morgana
Charlie Gards mother Connie Yates today left a courtroom in tears after the judge in the case said Charlie would have to die in a hospice if his parents and the London Hospital that has been refusing to treat him properly cant come to an agreement over where he will be when his life support is removed.
Charlies parents have been fighting with the hospital over whether or not they can take him home so he can be surrounded by friends and family after he is removed from life support. However the hospital has refused to allow him to go home saying that it doesnt think his ventilator would be able to fit through the front door of his house.
Charlies say they have found a doctor willing to look after the 11-month old boy so they can spend time with him at home away from the hospital during his final days but Judge Francis says Charlie will die in a hospice unless both sides can agree.
That prompted an emotional response from Yates.
Heres more:
CHARLIE Gards mum has today fled the court in tears as a judge confirmed the tot will die in a hospice unless a deal is struck with Great Ormond Street by midday tomorrow.
Connie Yates who is at the High Court alone began crying and shouting what if it was your child? before leaving the hearing this afternoon.
A High Court judge was set to announce his decision on where Charlie will end his life after his parents and hospital lawyers took on a new legal fight if the hospital and parents could not reach an agreement.
Fiona Paterson, a lawyer representing GOSH said the situation could not carry on and said this cannot drag on into another day.
After Mr Armstrong asked for 48 more hours to find an intensivist [board-certified physician who provides special care for critically ill patients] who can take care of Charlie, the judge said the indecision between the two groups is compounding the parents misery.
He said he was hoping for an agreement to be reached today and said: I have gone out of my way to accommodate the parents wishes.
He said he might give the parents until 12pm tomorrow to try to reach an agreement, but said there must be a default position if they cannot agree.
On Monday, Connie Yates and Chris Gard decided to end the legal battle to get their son experimental treatment. Based on new evidence, the couple said Charlies condition has deteriorated too much and there no longer is any hope of the treatment working.
Their final request to a judge this week was to be allowed to take Charlie home to die. The 11-month-old British infant has a rare mitochondrial disease and brain damage. His parents and Great Ormond Street Hospital have been in a months-long legal battle over his treatment.
We promised Charlie every day we would take him home. It seems really upsetting, after everything weve been through, to deny us this, his mother said.
Keep up with the latest pro-life news and information on Twitter.
London High Court judge Justice Francis is expected to rule on the request today, according to the Daily Mail.
The hospital opposes the parents request. Its lawyers argued that Charlie needs to stay at the hospital or go to a hospice facility until he dies. Doctors claimed his ventilator will not fit through the door of his parents home, and he could suffer a painful death.
The 11-month-old British infant has a rare mitochondrial disease. His parents and Great Ormond Street Hospital have been in a months-long legal battle over his treatment.
His mother told Good Morning Britain previously that she does not want her son to suffer. She said it has been absolute living hell to wait and wonder when the hospital might end his life support.
Hes our own flesh and blood and we dont even have a say in his life whatsoever, Yates said. We are not bad parents, we are there for him all the time, we are completely devoted to him and hes not in pain and suffering, and I promise everyone I would not sit there and watch my son in pain and suffering, I couldnt do it.
Questions remain about whether Charlie could have benefited from the experimental treatment, had it not been delayed for months during the legal battle between Charlies parents and the hospital. The court battle began in March.
In the Royal Court of Justice in London, Connie stated, Charlie was left to lie [in Great Ormond Street Hospital] and deteriorate. We wanted Charlie to have the chance [there] was never false hope, as confirmed by many experts. Now well never know Connie and Chris underscored that they should have been trusted as parents.
Despite all of his problems, Charlies parents and millions like them believe that Charlie is a valuable, living human being who should be given a chance to live.
Leading pro-life advocates helped Charlies parents fight for his life.
Charlies parents brought Terri Schiavos brother Bobby Schindler to London to help them fight for care for their son. Schindler spoke with LifeNews exclusively about their invitation.
Schindler told LifeNews: We are here by invitation from the family to come alongside them as they struggle to save their son, Charlie. The critical issue here is not a political one, but the simple notion that families know what is best for their loved ones.
Charlies situation is very reminiscent of my familys battle to save my sister, Terri. Hopefully being here can help his parents, Connie and Charlie, deal with the day-to-day emotional roller coaster, as they fight for their sons right to live, Schindler added.
Too bad, if McCain won’t be seeing Charlie where they will spend ETERNITY!
Get the judges name and address...for future reference.
Good GOD!!! Having a child when you are MARRIED is the BEST situation!! What are you, a Millennial with No Morals?
"Your honor, I can resolve that issue in five minutes."
It makes you pay more attention on what the word “subject” really means. We thought that the days of royals and aristocrats were gone but I guess they didn’t really change their ways they only put on a nice mask.
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
Prayers for Chris and Connie and for Charlie too.
Prayers for Chris and Connie and for Charlie too.
“What are you, a Millennial with No Morals?”
—
Of course./s
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.