Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawyers for Muslim cop who killed unarmed woman call for autopsy to see if victim was on Ambien
Jihad Watch ^ | Jul 22, 2017 | Robert Spencer

Posted on 07/22/2017 2:31:41 PM PDT by Ray76

Like so many Muslims before him, it looks as if Mohamed Noor has opted to defend himself by blaming the victim.

According to Drugs.com, “Ambien (zolpidem) is a sedative, also called a hypnotic. Zolpidem affects chemicals in the brain that may be unbalanced in people with sleep problems insomnia). Ambien is used to treat insomnia….Ambien may impair your thinking or reactions….Some people using this medicine have engaged in activity such as driving, eating, walking, making phone calls, or having sex and later having no memory of the activity.”

That Noor’s lawyers would choose this scurrilous course of action is astounding, but not at all surprising.

(Excerpt) Read more at jihadwatch.org ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: bluelivesmatter; noor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last
To: Ray76

How about a photo and full anal exam of this lawyer?


101 posted on 07/22/2017 5:57:42 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

Because standing and talking to a police officer while on Ambien in the middle of the night is illegal...?


102 posted on 07/22/2017 6:00:15 PM PDT by ponygirl (An Appeal to Heaven)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner

Why is this guy (the new recruit) wearing gloves?


103 posted on 07/22/2017 6:50:10 PM PDT by Enten (I don't have islamophobia...I do have islamonausea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

Yeah, who even cares if she was on MJ.
I have solved the case.
Said cop had 3 women who claimed assault charges on him and one lawsuit against him.
She called the cops before 11 PM, I would like to know the exact time the 911 call was made.
Let say his shift started at 11.
Maybe it was him who was assaulting this girl in the alley and when the squad car got there at 11:30 PM, he thought she would recognize him, so he shot her, case closed.

Sherlock


104 posted on 07/22/2017 6:57:15 PM PDT by sweetiepiezer (Winning is not getting old.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Oh how I hope you’re right. In today’s climate I wouldn’t be surprised if he walks....it’s Minneapolis you know.


105 posted on 07/22/2017 6:59:39 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tsomer

Suck lead- good one!


106 posted on 07/22/2017 7:00:52 PM PDT by arthurus (He just needs tp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The worse kind Hate. Specifically the hatred of women.


107 posted on 07/22/2017 7:41:22 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Does so

““Miranda” was a mistake.”

Perhaps, but since that ruling, the standards for Miranda have been diminished.

However, the 5th Amendment was not a mistake.


108 posted on 07/22/2017 7:42:46 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

BFD! The only drug she seemed to have that affected her was the lead from Patrolman Muzzie’s bullet!


109 posted on 07/22/2017 7:42:46 PM PDT by ssaftler ("Keep your hands to yourself, leave other people's things alone, and be kind to one another.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

“I believe you have confused “adequate” with “unscrupulous”, or maybe “pernicious”?”

While many find it unappetizing, the defense in this case should and will investigate the victim.

Everything that was in her system will be revealed to the defense, as will all her medical records be made available by some manner to the defense.

I don’t see where any thing exculpatory will be found, but the information will be available.


110 posted on 07/22/2017 7:48:46 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

“I know you weren’t addressing me, but his adequate council should convince the muzzy to plead guilty and throw himself on a pike, sorry, I mean on the mercy of the court.”

He is not going to plead guilty and I would not expect anyone accused of a such a crime to plead guilty.


111 posted on 07/22/2017 7:52:14 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

Will the perp be as heavily investigated as the victim?

I rather doubt it.

I’d be willing to bet there was no timely blood draw, or even a breathalyzer.


112 posted on 07/22/2017 7:52:51 PM PDT by null and void (This is how socialists work: Erase the past, Bankrupt the present, Steal from the future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

The author of the story somehow expects Noor to make a public statement.

That is a foolish expectation.

As for if Noor will talk to the review board, the police of DA, that is up to Noor, his attorney and the Bill of Rights.

But, I suspect that Noor and his attorney understand that he has nothing at all to gain by talking.


113 posted on 07/22/2017 7:56:31 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Enten

Hes wearing gloves because he was required to shake hands with women at his special ceremony ...the chief of police and probably the mayor...is my guess...

wouldnt do to get any of those 2nd class citizen female cooties on his uppity moslem butt...


114 posted on 07/22/2017 7:56:43 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: null and void

“Will the perp be as heavily investigated as the victim?”

“I rather doubt it.”,

“I’d be willing to bet there was no timely blood draw, or even a breathalyzer.”

Yes, cops are afforded rights and privileges that are not made available to civilians who may find themselves involved in a shooting

However, the prosecution should use all constitutional powers available to him to investigate the crime and the accused and the defense should use all means available to them to represent their client.


115 posted on 07/22/2017 8:03:50 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

“This should be a slam-dunk case for voluntary manslaughter at the very least. It is very possibly an intentional murder in a fit of rage.”

Yes, but we don’t need to discard the Bill or Rights to prosecute Noor.


116 posted on 07/22/2017 8:05:46 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

You just won whatever we have left.


117 posted on 07/22/2017 8:14:45 PM PDT by mcshot (Prepare for the new meaning of "riding shotgun" as it's coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1
Yes, but we don’t need to discard the Bill or Rights to prosecute Noor.

We have already discarded the Bill of Rights, and pretty much the rest of the Constitution as well. We pay lip service to the forms, but Government officials commonly do whatever they can get away with. "Laws are for little people".

And Noor will not be prosecuted for anything if the Muslim politicians and supporters in Minneapolis have their way. Sharia law endorses what Noor did.

By contrast, a White cop who shot an innocent Black woman under similar conditions would already have been fired and arrested. And the riots would have already started.

This is what has replaced rule-of-law today. There is no voting our way out of this.

Bad cops come from bad politicians.

118 posted on 07/22/2017 8:27:14 PM PDT by flamberge (What next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1
There is nothing in the constitution that says lawyers need to defend scum they know are guilty or that mandates defendants be represented by council (all twisting of the 6th amendment by the SC aside). And there lines that are crossed these days in 'defending' people that are nauseating. It is a personal choice by the money licking sh*teater, err, lawyer.
119 posted on 07/22/2017 8:32:13 PM PDT by TheTimeOfMan (A time for peace and a time for war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

“And Noor will not be prosecuted for anything if the Muslim politicians and supporters in Minneapolis have their way. Sharia law endorses what Noor did.”

My guess is that Noor will be charged and prosecuted and that case will be before a Minnesota state court and not a Sharia court.

“By contrast, a White cop who shot an innocent Black woman under similar conditions would already have been fired and arrested. And the riots would have already started.”

It’s just been a week, and the fastest I’ve recall a cop being fired after a bad shoot was Michael Slager who was fired a little less than a week after a questionable shooting.

Give it time, the firing of Noor is not relevant, the investigation and likely prosecution are relevant.


120 posted on 07/22/2017 8:42:42 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson