Posted on 05/05/2017 8:10:57 AM PDT by blueyon
Yes! You said it far better than I did!
If I recall correctly, this was a particularly vicious rape. Physical damage done to all mucous membranes, orifaces. Damage not done during consentual sex. . .this story stinks of blackmail and payoffs.
“Since the rape charges against both are being dropped, it can be assumed that there is not evidence to prove she didn’t consent to having sex with both.”
Possibly. Or her misrepresentations raised enough doubt to not continue the case.
The article states the selfies were sent only to Montano who then forwarded them to Milan. This seems to be a pretty strong indication she wasn’t interested in encouraging the older Milan.
I’ll take any charges they file against these two. But it’s bizarre Milan might not be included in the child porn charges when the images were still on his phone.
Unfortunately, the older scum bag is under 4 years older than the victim —just barely under yet under — and, so cannot be charged with statutory rape if the sex was consensual.
Satan walks among us. This was demonic.
Exactly.
No, the legal age of consent in Maryland is 16, but if a teenager of 14 has consensual sex with another teenager, as long as the older teen is not 4 or more years older, it is not considered statutory rape.
Lordy! How did we get to a place at which we are discussing a 14-year-old girl having sexual relations. And what has this child seen that she is okay with a threesome? God help us all.
And her lying about it will make it more difficult for the future unwilling victim(s) of these perverts.
is obama still president or what?
Bingo!! Apparently you can’t be a rapist of you’re not a white male.
He dreamed of being a pilot someday. Who knew Trayvon had such hopes and dreams for the future.
***
Well, he seemed to have had a lot of experience with flying high.
Yeah, supposedly they are also under 18, but, as someone pointed out upthread, who knows how old they really are? Could be in their 20s.
Most states have Romeo and Juliet laws. Usually means that as long as there is not more than four years difference between the students, and it’s consensual, than it’s legal. Over my four years of high school I knew a lot of seniors that dated freshman, and many that were having sex.
It does indeed sound like there is no case, even for “child porn”.
As far as that, yeah, maybe charges should be dropped.
But it doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be deported.
Sounds like our girl was lying. Why? And I never, ever heard a name for her, ever. I’ve wondered all along if she was illegal, too, which would make all the ballyhoo about the 2 boys kind of stupid.
Again, all should be deported. And at the very least, it does NOT speak well to their characters - and how they want a “better life”. Nor does it speak well to “teenage culture” as some idiot interviewed stated, as if hey, it’s just their choice! All lifestyles are valid!
It’s not my world and those monsters need to be deported pronto. Instead, they’ll probably be right back in high school.
Probably. So infuriating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.