Posted on 03/17/2017 6:01:46 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Much like Hollywood actresses making the rounds for awards season (roughly 20 major public appearances for an Oscar nominee in a mere 3.5 months), being FLOTUS, means countless state dinners, charity engagements and trips to be chicly attired for. First Lady Melania Trump has already stepped out in a series of designer looks for her first 56 days in the role, from Ralph Lauren to custom Herve Pierre and most recently a black beaded $9,590 Michael Kors suit for Donald Trump’s first joint address to Congress. However, unlike an A-list actress, Trump is reportedly footing the bill.
"Why do rich people need free clothes? Melania should buy her clothes," says veteran red carpet-stylist Phillip Bloch, who dressed Tiffany Trump for inauguration weekend. Kors released a statement about Trump’s congressional look, unofficially confirming that the First Lady purchased her ensemble: "Mrs. Trump has been a longtime client at our New York boutique. She has a keen understanding of what works best for her and her lifestyle. My embroidered black suit reflects the streamlined glamour that she is known for."
With a number of designers like Tom Ford, Sophie Theallet and Marc Jacobs publicly acknowledging post-election that they won’t be dressing the current First Lady — and a noted drop in designer press releases going out (a norm during Michelle O’s FLOTUS reign) — there's reason to wonder whether or not Mrs. Trump is buying by choice or if it's because she has less support from the fashion community and fewer covetable options than her predecessors.
Bloch says no: "Melania is buying, but she does not have limited options — she is married to a rich man and can buy whatever she wants!" The bi-coastal stylist, who served as the creative style director for Donald Trump’s Miss Universe Pageant, praises Mrs. Trump's choices thus far, "She wears clothes well and has a great style, I rarely see her make a misstep."
The president’s better half is technically not supposed to accept designer freebies, nor does the position come with a clothing allowance. And no, the taxpayers don’t foot the bill either. The first family is expected to pay for clothing out of pocket though it is assumed special discounts are offered; dressing the first lady is not only an honor for most brands, it often results in a sales boost, as evidenced by Ralph Lauren’s stock bump (from $88.19 to $90.13 per share) right after Trump wore the designer’s sky-blue ensemble on Inauguration Day.
Joanna Rosholm, press secretary to former first lady Obama (who was known for her love of both high-end fashion and contemporary brands like J. Crew) said that Obama did not borrow clothing during her 8 years in the White House. Rosholm explained in 2014: "Mrs. Obama pays for her clothing. For official events of public or historic significance, such as a state visit, the first lady's clothes may be given as a gift by a designer and accepted on behalf of the U.S. government. They are then stored by the National Archives.''
Laura Bush also paid for all her clothes, including her two inaugural ball gowns: a red crystal-embroidered gown by Texan designer Michael Faircloth and a silver and blue Oscar de la Renta. In her memoir Bush noted that she was "amazed by the sheer number of designer clothes I was expected to purchase" during her time as First Lady.
For her part, Kate Middleton follows a similar protocol, royals do not accept designer gifts. Middleton’s official public appearances wardrobe funds — an estimated $80,000 for her eight-day official Canadian tour in September of 2016 — come out of Prince Charles's "Household" budget. Designer Katherine Hooker reaffirmed the idea that the Duchess of Cambridge buys not borrows by telling the Huffington Post, "[Kate] doesn’t take free clothes, and I’ve heard that from other people who sent her things. She always comes to the shop, which is nice.”
Adds Bloch: "As much as I loved that Michelle [Obama] mixed high and low and Kate [Middleton] does it too, Melania just isn’t that girl. She is going to wear that $9,000 sequin outfit to Congress. I admire her for buying clothes and I think Hollywood can take a note."
Well, Carter was a poor POTUS, but Hussein was worse.
Was Truman poor? What about Ike. I know he had a general’s pension, but what about assets?
Truman.
HE...who’s name is Not Uttered!
And Hussein had LOTS of money ( not like Trump, but between both Obamas, they made millions before he was president ) but has much more now.
Ike was President of Columbia University before he was president and he also had written at least one book. Times were different back then, but he wasn’t “poor”.
By dumpster diving on the South Side of Chicago! ;^)
“Joanna Rosholm, press secretary to former first lady Obama (who was known for her love of both high-end fashion and contemporary brands like J. Crew). “ What a joke.
It was impossible to dress a woman devoid of beauty and grace with a dress of beauty and grace.
Does the National Archive use Moochies hand-me-downs for painting tarps?
The “WTF? Collection”
How did the Obamas make millions before arriving at the White House?
Michelle had a job at U of C Hosputal making around $300k per year. She seems to have been the primary bread winner.
Barack had royalties from his books, but did that amount to millions?
How did the Obamas make millions before arriving at the White House?
Michelle had a job at U of C Hosputal making around $300k per year. She seems to have been the primary bread winner.
Barack had royalties from his books, but did that amount to millions?
Thanx Other than military and president I realize I don’t know much about him.
Vot? Why do super rich hollyweird scum need free designer clothes?
When they lived in Chicago, they didn't have to pay much, if anything for Lab School ( which their kids went to ), because of that AFFIRMATIVE ACTION no show job he had at the U of C, which Lab is connected to. That, alone, saved them $60,000 per year.
They also had a private chef, who did the marketing and cooking for the family. THAT DOESN'T COME CHEAP!
The Mooch was also known to shop at pricey boutiques on Oak Street, where clothes are mainly from European designers.
And his tax returns, when he showed them, when he began his presidency proves my claim. Also, I used to live in Chicago...so know these things and more.
Nancy Reagan’s Fancy Freebies May Cost the Former First Couple a Pretty Penny in Back Taxes
Posted on January 8, 1990
Just how many designer dresses did she “borrow” during her eight-year tenure? When the IRS finds out, it just might slap the former first couple with some hefty fines.
I enjoy sharing the facts that I know and now, you know a little bit more about Ike than you did before. :-)
Not just clothes, but shoes, and even MORE expensive jewelry, which are “loaned” to them ALL...including the men...for these stupid award shows. The Hollyweirdos make huge sums and still get TONS of freebes!
Of course some of them came into it rich.
The Clintons and the Obummers came in deeply in debt and left rich. You figure out how that happened.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.