On election nite, I noticed that one news source will call a state, but the others delayed. By about 8:30 CT, several states had been called on some networks but not on all networks.
Then, the broadcasting of results stopped completely — for about 3 hours.
I suspected then that they saw Clinton losing. They halted the counting to see how many ‘extra’ votes she would need. I think in many states the margin of her losses were just too much. It would look fishy if she started winning states by 110-120% of the votes. They knew it was over for Clinton. She just could not catch up.
You are correct: O’Keefe & Co. apparently got a LOT closer to the fraudsters, closer than we know, close enough that they aborted their software and paper ballot mission. Nothing else explains the RAT confidence right up until 9p edt.
On election nite, I noticed that one news source will call a state, but the others delayed. By about 8:30 CT, several states had been called on some networks but not on all networks.
Then, the broadcasting of results stopped completely — for about 3 hours
________________________
I noticed that too. I thought they were playing games ala Dan Rather during the first W election night.
It was confirmed when a couple of days after the election, Limbaugh stated that he had talked to the head of a news division who admitted that they had stopped posting election results because they kept on waiting for them to get better for Clinton.
I would love to see a chart with what states were called when and by whom. Would be very interesting.