Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy

On election nite, I noticed that one news source will call a state, but the others delayed. By about 8:30 CT, several states had been called on some networks but not on all networks.

Then, the broadcasting of results stopped completely — for about 3 hours

________________________

I noticed that too. I thought they were playing games ala Dan Rather during the first W election night.

It was confirmed when a couple of days after the election, Limbaugh stated that he had talked to the head of a news division who admitted that they had stopped posting election results because they kept on waiting for them to get better for Clinton.


50 posted on 01/02/2017 4:13:47 PM PST by Chickensoup (Leftists today are speaking as if they plan to commence to commit genocide against conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Chickensoup

It was confirmed when a couple of days after the election, Limbaugh stated that he had talked to the head of a news division who admitted that they had stopped posting election results because they kept on waiting for them to get better for Clinton.


You’re right. Winning the popular vote argument was all they had left by 8est, and if CA had been discouraged they would have left the polling lines and gone home. Late-calling states ‘preserved’ the ‘popular vote’.

Hillary went apeshit making Mooks and Podesta threaten the networks with their lives if they didn’t slow-walk the true count.


61 posted on 01/02/2017 4:49:09 PM PST by txhurl (Break's over, kids, back to WAR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson