Poor India. Two recent article bashing India's attempts to build indigenous major weapons systems. The Arjun looks like a knockoff of the first generation German Leopard II tank. Pakistan seems to do a much better job with indigenous weapons. One reason is they partner with China instead of trying to go it alone.
1 posted on
11/28/2016 11:40:34 AM PST by
C19fan
To: C19fan
“Spanning two centuries”.
1999 to 2001?
2 posted on
11/28/2016 11:43:02 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: C19fan
Maybe it is me, but if I was Pakistan I wold not be very afraid of the Ghandi Tank. ;)
4 posted on
11/28/2016 11:47:13 AM PST by
freedumb2003
(Good morning President Trump)
To: C19fan
Wonder how is the tank’s software?
Hahaha!
5 posted on
11/28/2016 11:47:35 AM PST by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: C19fan
...This seems to beg the question about China's skillful approach to gathering technology and manufacturing know-how...
7 posted on
11/28/2016 11:49:16 AM PST by
ptsal
To: C19fan
Poor India. Two recent article bashing India's attempts to build indigenous major weapons systems. The Arjun looks like a knockoff of the first generation German Leopard II tank. Pakistan seems to do a much better job with indigenous weapons. One reason is they partner with China instead of trying to go it alone.Why don't they just GOOGLE "BEST TANKS IN THE WORLD" and they will know where to send their money.
http://www.military-today.com/tanks/top_10_main_battle_tanks.htm
FWIW: Neither India nor Pakistan is on that list.
To: C19fan
The Indian 1A1 rifle was a debacle as well...in part because FN (rightly) suspected design piracy was their intent, and sold them some “sample” FALs made from out-of-spec parts. None the wiser, the Indians reverse-engineered them and some sample L1A1s to create “their” design.
When they couldn’t make their hybrid rifle work (because everything was WAY out of spec), they had to approach FN and Enfield for help—and not only had to make a public apology, plus pay restitution/license fees...but they also had to buy a quantity of FN/L1A1 rifles as well.
11 posted on
11/28/2016 11:57:35 AM PST by
M1903A1
("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy... and call it progress")
To: C19fan
Why don’t you just buy your tanks from US, India?
12 posted on
11/28/2016 11:59:04 AM PST by
\/\/ayne
(I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
To: C19fan
It was a tankless job, but someone had to do it.
15 posted on
11/28/2016 12:02:12 PM PST by
chajin
("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
To: C19fan
16 posted on
11/28/2016 12:03:14 PM PST by
Gamecock
(Gun owner. Christian. Pro-American. Pro Law and Order. I am in the basket of deplorables.)
To: C19fan
Looks like it came out of a video game. An old one.
MkII:
19 posted on
11/28/2016 12:08:24 PM PST by
PLMerite
(Lord, let me die fighting lions. Amen.)
To: C19fan
To: C19fan
36 posted on
11/28/2016 1:12:47 PM PST by
pabianice
(LINE)
To: C19fan
38 posted on
11/28/2016 2:39:37 PM PST by
TBP
(0bama lies, Granny dies.)
To: C19fan
The problem with this article is it assumes that the Indian Army opposes the Arjun SOLELY for technical issues. The Indian Army standardized on the T-72 and its variants since the late 70s. So that means training combat crews, maintenance and logistics personnel ans developing supply systems, rail and road transport frameworks for a three-man-crewed medium-sized tank armed with a 125-mm smooth bore gun.
The Arjun project was reworked in the late 80s from being a medium-sized tank when Pakistan was close to buying the M-1 Abrams to turning into a four-man-crewed “Western style” tank with a 120-mm rifled bore gun. Any army would hate to have to extremely different weapon systems and associated training and logistics systems.
Long story short, the article has some shreds of truth but has no clue on the background and loses the plot as a result.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson