Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump, in Exclusive Interview, Tells WSJ He Is Willing to Keep Parts of Obama Health Law
The Wall Street Journal ^ | 11/11/2016 | GERARD BAKER and MONICA LANGLEY

Posted on 11/11/2016 12:40:58 PM PST by Kevin C

NEW YORK—President-elect Donald Trump said that, after conferring with President Barack Obama, he would consider leaving in place certain parts of the Affordable Care Act, an indication of possible compromise after a campaign in which he pledged repeatedly to repeal the 2010 health law.

In his first interview since his election earlier this week, Mr. Trump said one priority was moving “quickly” on the president’s signature health initiative, which he argued has become so unworkable and expensive that “you can’t use it.”

Yet, Mr. Trump also showed a willingness to preserve at least two provisions of the health law after the president asked him to reconsider repealing it during their meeting at the White House on Thursday

Mr. Trump said he favors keeping the prohibition against insurers denying coverage because of patients’ existing conditions, and a provision that allows parents to provide years of additional coverage for children on their insurance policies.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister
KEYWORDS: 2016issues; antitrump; bs; liars; misleadingarticle; obamacare; openborderslobby; propaganda; replaceandrepeal; trump; trumphaters; wsj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last
To: Kevin C

Today alone the headlines in these pravda media articles are full on lies.

Even more than before....


21 posted on 11/11/2016 12:47:03 PM PST by ColdOne ((poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~WE DID IT DEPLORABLES!EraseThe0bagambiLegacy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin C

This makes me sick already.

But did Trump really say that he decided on those two provisions—which I believe both his campaign and the GOP in Congress have long said they would incorporate into their replacement of Obamacare—after a plea from Obama?

I doubt it. This sounds like a lie spun by Obama’s team or the media. If Trump did actually say it, that IMO shows that he is dangerously naive, as a newbie, in dealing with the Dems on a political level.


22 posted on 11/11/2016 12:47:06 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin C

I do NOT trust WSJ


23 posted on 11/11/2016 12:47:38 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin C

LOLOLOLOLOL “He would consider..”

For a nano-second. Que the hand-wringers & never trumpets with that “I knew he would” BS.


24 posted on 11/11/2016 12:47:45 PM PST by TheStickman (Trump WON! Thank you, God in Heaven!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin C

Scrap it completely, the entire damnned thing. It is easier to build from scratch than it is to reconfigure an existing construct.


25 posted on 11/11/2016 12:48:15 PM PST by bigredkitty1 (March 5, 2010. Rest in peace, sweet boy. I will miss you, Big Red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin C

1. The “Act” will be REPEALED and REPLACED!

2. The NEW healthcare law MAY contain certain SIMILAR provisions of the OLD law.


26 posted on 11/11/2016 12:48:16 PM PST by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest
Sky News Newsdesk ‏@SkyNewsBreak 13m13 minutes ago Donald Trump says after his meeting with President Obama at the White House he is reconsidering his pledge to completely repeal 'Obamacare' 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
27 posted on 11/11/2016 12:48:23 PM PST by halo66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

Enough.

“Repeal and replace” doesn’t mean the two items from o-care can’t be included.


28 posted on 11/11/2016 12:48:40 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kevin C
REPEAL & DON'T REPLACE!

29 posted on 11/11/2016 12:48:48 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

And remember which branch of government makes laws and repeals laws. It’s not the one Mr. Trump will run.


30 posted on 11/11/2016 12:49:00 PM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kevin C

1. The “Act” will be REPEALED and REPLACED!

2. The NEW healthcare law MAY contain certain SIMILAR provisions of the OLD law.


31 posted on 11/11/2016 12:49:03 PM PST by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin C

2 provisions of pre-existing conditions and age of responsibility for coverage are not “keeping Obamacare”.

There was a pre-existing conditions provision prior to ObamaCare that was covered by state pools.

Given the age at which dependents actually finish education and go into jobs, I don’t really have a problem with 26.

That’s high school, college, and grad school for those in many fields, so I’m not really invested in an earlier age.

Nor is this keeping ObamaCare.


32 posted on 11/11/2016 12:49:29 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin C; All

Do as much as possible to turn healthcare back to the individual STATES and allow us to buy coverage across state lines and I will be Happy, Happy! Work with the State Governors on this - Scott Walker (R, WI) was just appointed as the liaison between the Governors and President-Elect (LOVE THAT!) Trump. (I forget what Walker’s new sideline is called, but he’ll do fine.)

Note: I’m a Vet and get STELLAR care through my state VA system. I wish the best, AFFORDABLE healthcare for ALL of us!


33 posted on 11/11/2016 12:49:35 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

A lot of health plans as we used to know them before Obamacare, was the ability to have it charged at a negotiated rate. Doctors’ rack rates were far more, perhaps reflecting the difficulty in being able to collect on a billing only basis.

How to bridge the gap and make it possible to keep costs reasonable? Perhaps a reversal of the individual atomization concept. Charities that might be willing to take problem cases under their wings with an understanding that someone helped by them would help others later through that charity, in a kind of pay it forward loop.


34 posted on 11/11/2016 12:50:02 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
You're right. Those are the two "popular provisions" that were focus-group-tested by Obama-ites.

They were the bright shiny objects designed to distract people from the unworkable mess.

35 posted on 11/11/2016 12:50:07 PM PST by shhrubbery! (NIH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
Yes, he is. Like the one that allows insurance plans to be offered across state lines. Which only makes sense.

From about day 1 Trump has said this. It's a 1946 law that is going to get repealed.

36 posted on 11/11/2016 12:50:21 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kevin C

You mean believe the DNC mediapukes..never!!!


37 posted on 11/11/2016 12:50:36 PM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin C

If insurance companies cannot rate people with preexisting conditions, we no longer have insurance. You cannot insure against something that has already happened. Coverage for preexisting conditions is simply cost shifting.


38 posted on 11/11/2016 12:50:47 PM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin C
It is not the same as the current system. This story is misleading. Obamacare is going away.

From http://www.speaker.gov/sites/speaker.house.gov/files/UploadedFiles/Summary_of_Republican_Alternative_Health_Care_plan.pdf

• Establishing Universal Access Programs to guarantee access to affordable care for those with pre- existing conditions. The GOP plan creates Universal Access Programs that expand and reform high- risk pools and reinsurance programs to guarantee that all Americans, regardless of pre-existing conditions or past illnesses, have access to affordable care – while lowering costs for all Americans.

39 posted on 11/11/2016 12:50:55 PM PST by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin C

Not worried. Obamacare is dead.

Period.

Full stop.

End of story.


40 posted on 11/11/2016 12:51:05 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson