Liberal Insanity On Parade.

Posted at Photobucket ^ | 11/5/2016 | Some leftard.

[Lazamataz]

This hyperventilating screed starts right off with demonstrably false points, and goes even further down the rabbit hole.

Moonbattery liberals like this do not have even a passing acquaintence with reality.

Since I have other things to do today, please, if anyone wants to refute these mindless droolings of a ranting madwoman -- point by point and with links to stories that refute -- I would gladly send out the refutations to some of the moonbats who post this.

[Lazamataz]

Usually, the claim of a liberal will be 180 degrees in opposition to reality.

[matt1234]

I do give the author credit for counting to 11 without goofing it up.

[FredZarguna]

#4. All US Presidential candidates (and most candidates for any Federal office) are "investigated" by the FBI, so this claim in and of itself means nothing.

in Trumps particular case, the result of additional scrutiny by the FBI -- as a result of innuendo and demands made by Democrat members of Congress -- actually found There was no link between Trump and the Russians.

The FBI has reiterated this several times now, but the liberals keep right on lying about it.

And we all thought they hated "McCarthyism."

[doorgunner69]

Kittens have enormous redeeming value, liberals, none.

[ATOMIC_PUNK]

On my photobucket

[FredZarguna]

#5. There is no requirement that any candidate make their tax returns public. If you're really worried about this, maybe you should be concerned about the fact that the Clinton Global Initiative and the Clinton Foundation BOTH routinely make "tax returns" public, which contain misleading/counterfactual information that's later "corrected" (usually after a Clinton or Clinton crony's appointment or election.)

You should also be concerned that Clinton's "tax returns" consistently show evidence of tax evasion, only revealed after someone doing an investigation or writing a book unearths evidence of a crime. The Clinton's and their "charities" have probably filed more 1040X's than the rest of the politicians in the country combined.

Example: Hillary received a gift of $1 million from Qatar that was neither reported to the US State Department as she promised she would do, nor reported in The Foundations public "tax statements." We just discovered it 4 days before the election, because of wikileaks.

So what's more problematic for you: no tax return? Or tax returns that have been deliberately falsified?

[Sasparilla]

I’ll take #4...

The alleged child “rape” lawsuit was dismissed by the so called victim yesterday. This 11 point rant is a sure sign of liberal panic. It’s fun to watch them squirm like this.

[Sasparilla]

Child rape dismissal link

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3894806/Woman-alleged-raped-Donald-Trump-13-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-DROPS-case-casting-doubt-truth-claims.html

[Maceman]

This showed up on my Facebook feed a couple of days ago.

[Kirkwood]

Go over to DU and remind them that they can write-in a vote for obama.

[Talisker]

I'm always amused by the discontinuity in information granularity liberal exemplify. It's because their talking points are written by anal policy wonks. So the same mouth breather who looks at you blankly without a clue when you point out that Chinese communism murdered a hundred million of its own people, will then regurgitate, in response, that the allegation that the sub-secretary of the Department of Internecine Discretionary Income over-utilized key assignments was proven false because a 1998 memo shows that intermediary hallway access was changed to combination locks. And then they stare at you in righteous indignation - or literally run out of the room.

Bat.Sh!t.Crazy.

You cannot argue with these people - they're not only insane, they're so schizophrenic they have no idea that they're crazy - and their handlers constantly tell them that conservatives are crazy.

Liberals are sealed off from the universe, and that's why they are obsessed with sealing off the universe from anyone not like them.

[lepton]

Interesting.

[FredZarguna]

#6. Your "facts" are interesting, and wrong.

Ohio didn't lose absentee ballots, postal workers in Michigan did.

So it is your theory that in one of the Federal Departments most overrepresented by Democrats, run by a Democrat administration, deliberately deep-sixed absentee ballots? Why would they do that, unless they happen to know whose votes they are, and in which case, they are almost certainly for Trump.

You concern is touching.

The "45,000 voters" you're talking about being disqualified in Indiana haven't been disqualified at all. The investigation is ongoing, and it is quite clear that (yet again) an Acorn-like organization has been forging and falsifying registrations. As a result, the Indiana State Police have been called in; nobody's registration has as yet been denied. But there are clear-cut cases of voter registration fraud.

That should concern you just as much as "disenfranchisement." Yet for some reason, it doesn't.

[Old Grumpy]

Whoever wrote that drivel probably STILL insists there were NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.

[Lazamataz]

Thanks Fred. You did a lot of good work on this thread!

[Col Freeper]

[trisham]

One of my sisters (a conservative) was talking on the phone recently to another of my sisters (a liberal) when the subject of Trump’s conversation with Billy Bush was raised.

My liberal sister said that what Trump said about women was so upsetting to her that she was shaking. It’s impossible for me to understand the thinking process of liberals, even those in my family.

[HandyDandy]

What if, every time a liberal lied, God killed a kitten?