Skip to comments.
Wall Street Journal Finally Lashes Out "The Press Is Burying Hillary Clinton's Sins"
Zerohedge ^
| 10/14/2016
| Tyler Durden
Posted on 10/14/2016 11:56:19 AM PDT by Rusty0604
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
10/14/2016 11:56:19 AM PDT
by
Rusty0604
To: Rusty0604
The WSJ is carrying Clinton’s water.
See Rove, Gigot, Stevens.
Liberal Establishment Pussies, all.
2
posted on
10/14/2016 11:57:19 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
("BECAUSE YOU'D BE IN JAIL")
To: Rusty0604
3
posted on
10/14/2016 11:57:40 AM PDT
by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
To: Rusty0604
Interesting development considering the WSJ has been part of the biased media shielding Hilliary!.
4
posted on
10/14/2016 11:59:12 AM PDT
by
Arm_Bears
(Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
To: miss marmelstein
Cheap illegal immigrants to mow their lawn for $5.00 / hour is all they care about.
5
posted on
10/14/2016 11:59:15 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
("BECAUSE YOU'D BE IN JAIL")
To: Rusty0604
That the nation now has proof of pretty much everything she has been accused of.
And Comey gave her the immunity idol...
6
posted on
10/14/2016 11:59:37 AM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
To: Arm_Bears
WSJ editorial has always been more right-leaning than WSJ “news”.
7
posted on
10/14/2016 12:00:57 PM PDT
by
bigbob
(The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
To: miss marmelstein
Kimberly Strassel may be out of a job soon.
8
posted on
10/14/2016 12:00:59 PM PDT
by
Rusty0604
To: Rusty0604
Sins? Try treason and crimes...
To: Rusty0604
Once they start....it’s all gonna come down....
10
posted on
10/14/2016 12:03:21 PM PDT
by
Doogle
(( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
To: Rusty0604
Which one is that? The really corporate type who shows up on Morning Joe on occasion?
In a weird way, I would almost want Clinton to win just to see the smirk wiped off these rotten globalists as they regret their constant nastiness towards Trump.
11
posted on
10/14/2016 12:03:40 PM PDT
by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
To: Uncle Miltie
12
posted on
10/14/2016 12:04:28 PM PDT
by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
To: Uncle Miltie
Cheap illegal immigrants to mow their lawn for $5.00 / hour is all they care about. I want to know where these "Cheap illegal immigrants" that work for $5.00 an hour are. When I had to hire a lawn service because my husband had back surgery it was $50.00 for what was about a 1/2 hour job.
Cheaper then having to deal with the city but still, I keep hearing about all these illegals that will work cheap but I can't find 'em.
13
posted on
10/14/2016 12:04:58 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles!)
To: Uncle Miltie
--
The WSJ is carrying Clinton's water. --
Yes it is. A story about "burying Clinton stories" is another example of all talk, no action. The Clinton stories are still buried. We get it.
14
posted on
10/14/2016 12:07:20 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: Rusty0604
Her own people referred to their base as “the Red Army”?
Anyone know which email that was in? It’ll be choice to present to those left wing loons who somehow insists that they aren’t communists.
15
posted on
10/14/2016 12:07:44 PM PDT
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: Rusty0604
To: miss marmelstein
The problem with the wsj is today they may have a decent article and then for the next 3 days every one of them is trash... Like Brett Stephens writes. (Why I cancelled my two subscriptions).
17
posted on
10/14/2016 12:16:42 PM PDT
by
lilypad
To: Rusty0604
No, I think not. She is the designated Conservative on the editorial side. Actually, she is a good journalist. I always read her columns.
18
posted on
10/14/2016 12:19:03 PM PDT
by
burghguy
To: lilypad
That’s too bad. It used to be a great paper. I lost hope when Dorothy Rabinowitz who I used to admire started sneering at Trump. That did it. Let her put up with HC for the next 4 years!
19
posted on
10/14/2016 12:20:31 PM PDT
by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
To: miss marmelstein
I don’t know, she is the author of this WSJ article.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson