Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DID WIKILEAKS UNCOVER A MURDER PLOT? – Podesta Documents Suggest Scalia Assassination
thegatewaypundit.com ^ | Oct. 13, 2016 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 10/13/2016 5:20:39 PM PDT by FR_addict

Wikileaks released another 2,000 Podesta emails on Thursday morning.

This was the group’s 5th release on the Podesta emails.

Now this— The internet blowing up over a document regarding Supreme Court Justice Scalia.

A new theory has emerged that Hillary Clinton and her lackeys are linked to Justice Scalia’s death.

TMN Today reported:

The theory comes from a WikiLeaks email from Hillary’s Chairman John Podesta to DC lobbyist Steve Elmendorf. Elmendorf was also the former chief of staff to Democratic leader Dick Gephardt.

Podesta writes, “Didn’t think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.”

Elmendrof responds, “I am all in Sounds like it will be a bad nite , we all need to buckle up and double down”

podesta-scalia

‘Wet work” is slang for assassination.

More from TMN:

The theory goes that Podesta’s use of wet work implies an assassination. And the references to pool and Vineyard refer to the Cibolo Creek Ranch where Scalia’s body was found.

The Ranch does have a pool and it is believed that a vineyard is just down the road.

The email was also written just four days before Scalia was found dead on February 13, 2016.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: anotherarkincide; comeyrico; fbirico; foster; scalia; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: combat_boots

His body not being flown back for autopsy. Not one but TWO cremations...as the one didn’t burn hot enough.

Murder.


Agree.

Yet, taken hours away, to an El Paso mortuary???


81 posted on 10/13/2016 8:02:53 PM PDT by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy; combat_boots

The family didn’t seem to have any qualms about the situation either.


Neither did Breitbart’s, as I recall.

Nice family you have there, ma’am.

Just sayin’.


82 posted on 10/13/2016 8:04:17 PM PDT by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: All

409 comments at GP.


83 posted on 10/13/2016 8:05:54 PM PDT by BeadCounter ( Trump Pence! The only choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

“For the best night’s sleep in the whole wide world, it’s my pillow dot com”


84 posted on 10/13/2016 8:06:49 PM PDT by BeadCounter ( Trump Pence! The only choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: BeadCounter

I’ll take goose down;thanks.


85 posted on 10/13/2016 8:28:51 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: JDoutrider

Treason file Bookmark


86 posted on 10/13/2016 8:31:33 PM PDT by JDoutrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

agree!


87 posted on 10/13/2016 8:32:25 PM PDT by mcshot (The "Greatest Generation" would never have allowed the trashing of our Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JDoutrider

Bookmark


88 posted on 10/13/2016 8:33:06 PM PDT by JDoutrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

I have read the pm chain and wonder what it means. I really cannot see how it connects to the debate to be honest.

The chain reads like we caught it in the middle of a conversation, or were not part of a priorr conversation.

Suppose it was like this. Both find out how the wetwork is set to go down. Now they are messaging each other about it. Podesta (maybe sarcastically) tells elmendorf that he didnt think wetwork meant pool parties at the vinyard. To which elmendorf replies that he is all in (aka he is all for it) and that it will be bad and they need to buckle down.

It would be great to see messages before and after. But if they were both at a meeting that was planning the wetwork we may very well just have these messages as all other parts of the conversation was done in person at the meeting.

Arkanicide is real, perhaps this is too. It certainly does not seem to have any connection to a debate, or at least the debate angle seems as connected as a possible hit.


89 posted on 10/13/2016 8:37:30 PM PDT by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Bookmarking


90 posted on 10/13/2016 8:40:34 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

**... northeastern elites...**

Paleeeeeze!


91 posted on 10/13/2016 8:57:29 PM PDT by Daffynition (*Donald Trump represents the WILL of the PEOPLE.*~ Don King 09.24.16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy

There are so many variables favoring the murder scenario, Occam’s razor says this is the most likely.


92 posted on 10/13/2016 9:16:06 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead

Good analysis on your part, IMO. Your potential explanation is certainly reasonable. The `I`m all in` comment doesn`t seem to fit in with a discussion about the primary. Perhaps they both came from an in person meeting with others involved, in which they were informed of the plot.

It would be interesting to see their schedules from earlier that day, if such info is available, to see who they both might have met with.


93 posted on 10/13/2016 10:47:32 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Agree.


94 posted on 10/13/2016 11:52:25 PM PDT by LouisianaJoanof Arc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

“They are not going to discuss assassination in an email.”

in a normal world you would be right. but look what actually is happening. he died under suspicious circumstances and the media ignored it. now there is an email, again ignored. if you knew you were untouchable, you might discuss it in an email.


95 posted on 10/13/2016 11:52:25 PM PDT by thehopster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister
“Didn't think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.”

To me there were back and forth emails about wet work with Podesta essentially acknowledging that he knew what the term meant—killing.

This is 1/20 of the Podesta emails. I'm hoping those blanks will get filled in......The media can try to sit on it but the people will yank them out of their studios and hang them in the street.

96 posted on 10/13/2016 11:52:25 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Obama voters killed America. Treat them accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

“Didn’t think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.”

It was obviously an email exchange about ‘wet work’ with Podesta finally conceding he knew what ‘wet works’ meant—murder

This is 1/20th of the Podesta emails released. Hopefully the upcoming release will fill in the blanks and blow this thing wide open.


97 posted on 10/13/2016 11:52:25 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Obama voters killed America. Treat them accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
They are not going to discuss assassination in an email.

My thoughts too but the hubris sometimes outweighs the "smarts" and talking around a topic might seem sufficient protection - especially in a world where their kind is protected from all sorts of "mischief" and another will do the dangerous part.

Kind of hard to come up with a logical scenario for the "wet work" comment and other enigmatic comments with it.

Evil is sly but often stupid to boot.

98 posted on 10/14/2016 4:21:39 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
I have read the pm chain and wonder what it means. I really cannot see how it connects to the debate to be honest.

It doesn't connect to a debate.

Look at the date of the message. It is the same day as the NH primary, which Clinton lost (and was expected to lose).

Take off your tin-foil hat, and the simple explanation becomes obvious.

99 posted on 10/14/2016 6:49:28 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
“Look at the date of the message. It is the same day as the NH primary”

You know for a fact they were talking about the NH primary and not something else? Or are you jumping to conclusions?/s

Why are you hysterical about defending hillary? What's your agenda here?

Hillary has enough ‘fact checkers’ aka propagandists in the media. We shouldn't have to read it here.

100 posted on 10/14/2016 12:01:22 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Obama voters killed America. Treat them accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson