Posted on 10/13/2016 5:20:39 PM PDT by FR_addict
Wikileaks released another 2,000 Podesta emails on Thursday morning.
This was the groups 5th release on the Podesta emails.
Now this The internet blowing up over a document regarding Supreme Court Justice Scalia.
A new theory has emerged that Hillary Clinton and her lackeys are linked to Justice Scalias death.
TMN Today reported:
The theory comes from a WikiLeaks email from Hillarys Chairman John Podesta to DC lobbyist Steve Elmendorf. Elmendorf was also the former chief of staff to Democratic leader Dick Gephardt.
Podesta writes, Didnt think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.
Elmendrof responds, I am all in Sounds like it will be a bad nite , we all need to buckle up and double down
podesta-scalia
Wet work is slang for assassination.
More from TMN:
The theory goes that Podestas use of wet work implies an assassination. And the references to pool and Vineyard refer to the Cibolo Creek Ranch where Scalias body was found.
The Ranch does have a pool and it is believed that a vineyard is just down the road.
The email was also written just four days before Scalia was found dead on February 13, 2016.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
His body not being flown back for autopsy. Not one but TWO cremations...as the one didnt burn hot enough.
Murder.
Agree.
Yet, taken hours away, to an El Paso mortuary???
The family didnt seem to have any qualms about the situation either.
Neither did Breitbart’s, as I recall.
Nice family you have there, ma’am.
Just sayin’.
409 comments at GP.
“For the best night’s sleep in the whole wide world, it’s my pillow dot com”
I’ll take goose down;thanks.
Treason file Bookmark
agree!
Bookmark
I have read the pm chain and wonder what it means. I really cannot see how it connects to the debate to be honest.
The chain reads like we caught it in the middle of a conversation, or were not part of a priorr conversation.
Suppose it was like this. Both find out how the wetwork is set to go down. Now they are messaging each other about it. Podesta (maybe sarcastically) tells elmendorf that he didnt think wetwork meant pool parties at the vinyard. To which elmendorf replies that he is all in (aka he is all for it) and that it will be bad and they need to buckle down.
It would be great to see messages before and after. But if they were both at a meeting that was planning the wetwork we may very well just have these messages as all other parts of the conversation was done in person at the meeting.
Arkanicide is real, perhaps this is too. It certainly does not seem to have any connection to a debate, or at least the debate angle seems as connected as a possible hit.
Bookmarking
**... northeastern elites...**
Paleeeeeze!
There are so many variables favoring the murder scenario, Occam’s razor says this is the most likely.
Good analysis on your part, IMO. Your potential explanation is certainly reasonable. The `I`m all in` comment doesn`t seem to fit in with a discussion about the primary. Perhaps they both came from an in person meeting with others involved, in which they were informed of the plot.
It would be interesting to see their schedules from earlier that day, if such info is available, to see who they both might have met with.
Agree.
“They are not going to discuss assassination in an email.”
in a normal world you would be right. but look what actually is happening. he died under suspicious circumstances and the media ignored it. now there is an email, again ignored. if you knew you were untouchable, you might discuss it in an email.
To me there were back and forth emails about wet work with Podesta essentially acknowledging that he knew what the term meant—killing.
This is 1/20 of the Podesta emails. I'm hoping those blanks will get filled in......The media can try to sit on it but the people will yank them out of their studios and hang them in the street.
“Didn’t think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.”
It was obviously an email exchange about ‘wet work’ with Podesta finally conceding he knew what ‘wet works’ meant—murder
This is 1/20th of the Podesta emails released. Hopefully the upcoming release will fill in the blanks and blow this thing wide open.
My thoughts too but the hubris sometimes outweighs the "smarts" and talking around a topic might seem sufficient protection - especially in a world where their kind is protected from all sorts of "mischief" and another will do the dangerous part.
Kind of hard to come up with a logical scenario for the "wet work" comment and other enigmatic comments with it.
Evil is sly but often stupid to boot.
It doesn't connect to a debate.
Look at the date of the message. It is the same day as the NH primary, which Clinton lost (and was expected to lose).
Take off your tin-foil hat, and the simple explanation becomes obvious.
You know for a fact they were talking about the NH primary and not something else? Or are you jumping to conclusions?/s
Why are you hysterical about defending hillary? What's your agenda here?
Hillary has enough ‘fact checkers’ aka propagandists in the media. We shouldn't have to read it here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.