Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

People of Mexico, where have you gone?
Mexico National Statistics Institute ^ | 9/1/2016 | Self

Posted on 09/01/2016 7:52:29 AM PDT by Riflema

Here's an interesting quick, "back of the envelope" calculation of how many Mexicans have emigrated from their beloved homeland.

Their government does maintain statistical records of births, deaths and overall population, which even an English speaker such as myself can find and download (link above).

Take a look at this table of births & deaths:

Year Birth death net Calculated Popn
1990 2,735,312 422,803 2,312,509 81,249,645
1991 2,756,447 411,131 2,345,316 83,594,961
1992 2,797,397 409,814 2,387,583 85,982,544
1993 2,839,686 416,335 2,423,351 88,405,895
1994 2,904,389 419,074 2,485,315 90,891,210
1995 2,750,444 430,278 2,320,166 93,211,376
1996 2,707,718 436,321 2,271,397 95,482,773
1997 2,698,425 440,437 2,257,988 97,740,761
1998 2,668,429 444,665 2,223,764 99,964,525
1999 2,769,089 443,950 2,325,139 102,289,664
2000 2,798,339 437,667 2,360,672 104,650,336
2001 2,767,610 443,127 2,324,483 106,974,819
2002 2,699,084 459,687 2,239,397 109,214,216
2003 2,655,894 472,140 2,183,754 111,397,970
2004 2,625,056 473,417 2,151,639 113,549,609
2005 2,567,906 495,240 2,072,666 115,622,275
2006 2,505,939 494,471 2,011,468 117,633,743
2007 2,655,083 514,420 2,140,663 119,774,406
2008 2,636,110 539,530 2,096,580 121,870,986
2009 2,577,214 564,673 2,012,541 123,883,527
2010 2,643,908 592,018 2,051,890 125,935,417
2011 2,586,287 590,693 1,995,594 127,931,011
2012 2,498,880 602,354 1,896,526 129,827,537
2013 2,478,889 623,599 1,855,290 131,682,827
2014 2,463,420 633,641 1,829,779 133,512,606

Now compare with their overall population counts through 2010:

1990 81,249,645
1995 91,158,290
2000 97,483,412
2005 103,263,388
2010 112,336,538

So, looking at 2010, their should have been 125m Mexicans over there, but they only counted 112m. So 13m have gone AWOL. I wonder where they went? I assume they have not emigrated to the greener pastures of Nicaragua, Guatemala etc.

And this is for Mexico alone. If I had the time, I could try and do the same for the rest of Latin and South America (Brazil anyone?). But you get the point:

That oft-quoted number of 11 million "living in the shadows" is total bunk as we all suspected. I would hazard the real number is somewhere between 15 and 30


TOPICS: Business/Economy; History
KEYWORDS: immigration; mexico
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
I was sitting here wondering if anyone had bothered to run these numbers, so did it myself. Sometimes official statistics reveal things you'd rather left unspoken.
1 posted on 09/01/2016 7:52:29 AM PDT by Riflema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Riflema

Sort of like those Philadelphia precinct totals from the 2012 presidential election . . . compare them with an election or two before and they are statistically impossible, but somehow they are still accepted as official.


2 posted on 09/01/2016 8:00:36 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riflema

Great job! Excellent FR sleuthing.

Screen capture all you can in case this goes viral and the governments shut it all down to keep people like you from getting further with it.


3 posted on 09/01/2016 8:00:48 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riflema

Where indeed?


4 posted on 09/01/2016 8:04:33 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal (*Convicted of thought crimes by the Left and the Right*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riflema
Interesting - some things just don't make sense.
Let's assume all is true.

1990 shows no difference between calculated and actual.
Is that possible ?

I am also assuming that the missing are cumulative - the missing for 1995 are still missing today.
1995 had approx 2 million difference.
2005 had approx 12 million difference.
2010 had approx 12 million difference - is that possible ?

5 posted on 09/01/2016 8:11:08 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riflema

Awesome job. I would base it from 86 when the last blanket amnesty was granted. I would also run the numbers for the rest of Central America.

Once done I would send it to Trump. I suspect there are as many as 50 million illegals.


6 posted on 09/01/2016 8:23:33 AM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools. Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riflema

Where have you gone, folks of Mexico?
A nation turns it’s lonely eyes to you
Woo woo woo

What’s that you say, Mrs. Rodriguez?
Pedro has gone north with Old Jose
Hey hey hey?
Hey hey hey


7 posted on 09/01/2016 8:24:00 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

It would be better based on 86, the date of the last blanket amnesty. That would truly be the no diff between calculated and actual basis.


8 posted on 09/01/2016 8:25:55 AM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools. Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

The big bump occurred, not due to 86 amnesty, but due to Clinton Treas Sec Rubin destroying the Mexican economy (for their own good) in the 90s. Rubin forced the Maquiladoras to flee Mexico for Asia. Those unemployed then looked for jobs where they could find them... here. When the fled there were no longer customers for the retail sector... So the retail employees...and business owners also came here.


9 posted on 09/01/2016 8:34:03 AM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Riflema

Those stats neglect the children born here to illegal parents. I don’t consider them to be citizens, either.


10 posted on 09/01/2016 8:35:27 AM PDT by ChiefJayStrongbow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riflema

I would assume that you took 1990 as a base year and based your calculations off the assumption that the census population was the zero-illegal one. Given that, you may be underestimating the total as your calculation accounts only for illegals emigrating after 1990. Of course there are no reliable numbers for death rates of illegals in the US. Deaths would reduce the total number, while births would not increase the total since birthright citizenship makes those children born here US citizens, and hence not illegals (Just stating fact here, not expressing approval)


11 posted on 09/01/2016 8:37:18 AM PDT by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riflema
The CIA Factbook has a lot of demographic data but it is data only from the current year or last year calculated.

The website Index Mundi started in 2000 and they accumulate data from the CIA Factbook.

Other good sources are the World Bank and the UN.

Another good source is Wikipedia. the problem there is how you search. You can use the Wikipedia search function or search Wikipedia using a Google search, such as: "Wikipedia Mexico immigration rate"

12 posted on 09/01/2016 9:46:27 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riflema
Where have all the Mexicans gone, long time passing?
Where have all the Mexicans gone, long time ago?
Where have all the Mexicans gone?
Fled to America everyone.
Oh, when will they ever return?
Oh, when will they ever return?
13 posted on 09/01/2016 10:48:51 AM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riflema

I don’t think the start date of your analysis matters to 1986 or 1990. I would want to run the data by someone who deals in Mexican demographics. I wonder how the entity that produced this data handles non documenteds leaving the country.

Interesting that Mexico has 2.5 million births compared to USA 3.9 million births. Also note that the # of births is declining like it is in the USA.


14 posted on 09/01/2016 11:20:57 AM PDT by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riflema

Quite a few years ago I remember reading that of all living Mexicans who were born in Mexico, one in seven were in the United States.


15 posted on 09/01/2016 11:36:51 AM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Yep, I went with 1990 as the nearest year which the had numbers for. Given what happened in 86, I’d be shocked if a bunch of our neighbors didn’t jump the fence between 86 and 90, so, yes, I’m understating it.


16 posted on 09/01/2016 1:23:45 PM PDT by Riflema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

I heard a second rationale: NAFTA allowed our farm products to go there very much cheaper and made their small backward family farms unviable. Thus the peasants looked for other stuff to do.


17 posted on 09/01/2016 1:25:36 PM PDT by Riflema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steven Scharf

I just went with 1990 as the baseline as it was shortly after the amnesty and was the earliest data they had an overall population for. And yes, the birthrate was phenomenal.


18 posted on 09/01/2016 1:27:01 PM PDT by Riflema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

clinton’s nafta also destroyed mexican farmer who couldn’t compete with US grain producers.


19 posted on 09/01/2016 4:38:38 PM PDT by ckilmer (q e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

You’re right. But the Mexican land ownership system is so lousy that it is more to blame than NAFTA.

Also we send increased corn/wheat to Mexico. They send increased fresh fruit and vegetables to us.


20 posted on 09/02/2016 3:34:19 AM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson