Hawaii Official Who Died After Crash Wore Infant Life Vest

Hawaii's former health director who died after a plane she was traveling in crashed into the ocean was wearing an infant life vest and the pilot didn't give a safety briefing before takeoff, according to details in a National Transportation Safety Board report.

An autopsy determined Loretta Fuddy died of an irregular heartbeat from hyperventilating after she exited the plane, which landed in choppy water off the island of Molokai. The pilot and seven other passengers on the 2013 Makani Kai Air flight survived.

Pilot Clyde Kawasaki reported to the NTSB that he heard a loud bang, followed by an immediate loss of engine power soon after the single-engine Cessna took off from Molokai, headed for Honolulu.

If this had all been pre-planned and the passengers had some foreknowledge, that would mean the "catastrophic engine failure" would have had to have been either a hoax or a planned, in-flight sabotage, wouldn't it?

Does the passengers' universal, calm demeanor suggest which is correct, a hoax or sabotage? How would any of us react if our airplane's engine made a loud, hammer-like bang?

As a result of an instantaneous loss of engine power, a plane's turning climb would quickly morph into a nose-low descent to regain and maintain airspeed, which would very likely be accompanied by very uncomfortable negative-G forces. Remember how the Maui passengers reacted to a real catastrophic engine failure just two months earlier?

Afterward, if lawsuits are filed against the engine manufacturer, which of course they settled--one can only believe for millions of dollars--is it possible such lawsuits were skewed in their representations by foreknowledge of a hoax or sabotage?

Has the justice system been a vehicle for opportunists seeking inappropriate (read: illegal) financial rewards?

If the claimed catastrophic engine failure was pre-planned, doesn't that imply the engine manufacturer was framed, (with or without an actual death)?

And what of the companies' reputations that might have suffered? Was there someone or company that might have stood to gain from such an event?

Inquiring minds want to know!

It was the USCG, NTSB, and Flip HOllstein who “got the jargon wrong”. And the NTSB considered it significant enough that they were going to get Makani Kai Air in trouble for not having ADULT life jackets available.

If there had been an investigation, the lifejacket that was removed from Fuddy’s “body” would have been taken as evidence. But guess what? There was no investigation. The “accident” (even though the video of it has a running engine right up to the water landing, as rx has noted) supposedly happened 1/2 mile from land (even though the FAA recordings and reports accurately say that it was about 300 yards from the airport. The 1/2-mile lie was essential to make sure that it wasn’t within either Kalawao County or Maui County jurisdiction - but within FBI JURISDICTION.

The USCG commander reported this event to the FBI but the FBI will not allow anybody to know whether they investigated this in any way.

Maui County Police Department says they have no records of communications asking for help in this “outside assistance” case - nobody has anybody exactly WHO they were “assisting” when they completed the “autopsy”.

NTSB and Maui County Police Dept both claimed the other was responsible to come out with a Cause of Death. The implication in all of this was that Maui County was responsible for investigating the death. In ordering the autopsy, Maui County cited the statutes that would apply if it was under their jurisdiction. All a head fake. The FBI was responsible to investigate. Did they? Or did they say that the “death”in US waters of the only known witness who could testify against Dennis Montgomery was not significant enough to investigate? (Kind of like Hillary’s emails aren’t significant enough to investigate)

rx has shown clear evidence that this was all pre-planned. This pre-planned water landing of a perfectly good plane (according to the engine noise on the video recording) - complete with mannequin that looked like Fuddy and a USCG-recovered “body” that had a different lifejacket than the one Fuddy is clearly wearing just outside the plane in the video - happened Dec 11 - a mere 19 days after Zullo’s Nov 22nd public statement that he had “universe shattering” evidence.

Those of us who have dealt with the FBI have known for a long time that they are a politicized entity, covering up for the regime’s many, many crimes. James Comey made abundantly clear what some of us have known for a long time. MCPD says there are no records of anybody asking them to conduct an autopsy, but it so happens that only the FBI had jurisdiction, and the wife of the FBI’s chief boss (AG Eric Holder) just happened to be on Maui when the coroner was deciding what to say publicly about this “death” - with a recovered “body” whose lifejacket did NOT match what Fuddy was actually wearing and was most likely the mannequin that was sitting on the seat in front of Puentes. And not only was Mrs. Holder there when coroner Harle was deciding, but Valerie Jarrett and Michelle Obama were there too - and Michelle Obama hung around indefinitely until the day the coroner released an “accidental” COD, which is when Michelle let her schedule show she would be back in DC in a couple of days.

RX, this should actually have its own thread. This is buried way too deeply for most people to see it.

Nully, can you ping your list?

Should have been “nobody has any IDEA exactly WHO they were “assisting” when they completed the “autopsy”.

And I would add - Or they won’t tell anybody. And they claim no records of receiving any communications requesting their “outside assistance” - no phone call received, no email, no fax, no text, nothing. No notes taken about the request, nothing. Kind of like they have no records of how Harle communicated the pronunciation of death.

Then again, their official report references ANOTHER report, complete with file number, that they now deny exists. So records that are supposed to exist don’t.

Kind of like the FAA, which claims to have lawfully destroyed (within 10 days of my protest at their closing of my FOIA request) records that are required to be retained for 2 years after their last communication to a FOIA requester regarding a request for those records...

And it’s a funny thing; my email protesting the closure of that request (which was done by not telling me that my request was divided into 2 different requests and that the 2 different deadlines I was given to respond were because my request had been divided) was deleted from the ISP within those 10 days, when only the FAA and my research colleague were aware of that email. Unless somebody with the power to delete emails at the server level was snooping in my emails... But why would somebody like the NSA want to delete just that email?

Oh - and all this happened at the same time as somebody on my blog who was claiming unlimited computer skills and money threatened to hack my computer if I didn’t shut up about the Fuddy issue. Said my husband needed to lose his job if I didn’t shut up. (Somebody who claims to have power here at FR, and to have puppets he/she can control here...) About the same time the fogblowers were saying I needed to get a job so I wouldn’t have time or energy to investigate any more.

And ya know, it’s funny. About 6 weeks after that threat (which I didn’t even know about until later because somebody hacked my blog administration and shut off email notifications of submitted comments...) my husband and daughter started showing symptoms which we now know fit heavy metal poisoning.

After somebody here posted about black-ops poisons that mimic Alzheimers I tested my husband and daughter and found elevated levels of arsenic, cadmium, and lead (among other things) - which Australian research shows to be a potent, fast “poison cocktail” which very quickly produces Alzheimers-like symptoms including elevated Alzheimers proteins which means it will always be diagnosed as Alzheimers-related. It’s the perfect poison because the amplifying combination allows environmental levels of each heavy metal to be used so that if anybody suspects and checks during the poisoning it will seem environmental (and yes, we checked for environmental sources of these poisons and found none). If they check after the poisoning there won’t even be environmental levels found in urine or blood; the poisons will only be detected in the body tissues using a chelation test, which traditional medicine won’t do (but Mayo Clinic trusts the results of a chelation test). What WILL show up is brain damage and evidence of “an Alzheimers type process”. It’s a fast, perfect way to get away with deliberately giving somebody dementia.

My husband is disabled now with dementia. We have moved and I am working full-time to put my kids through college. I don’t have near the time I used to have, to research. Funny, huh? Not. This regime’s crimes have real victims.

Bill Clinton acts a LOT like my husband. He should have a chelation test.

But he should make sure NOT to have an MRI with gadolinium-based contrast agent anytime before the chelation test because the medical community now has proof that it stays in the body tissues (IOW it DID lose the chelator it was originally joined with and joined instead to the body tissues) of a person WITHOUT KIDNEY DAMAGE for at least 6 weeks, but they were not interested enough to check whether they should revise their claims that the heavy-metal gadolinium is safe because it’s out of the body in 24 hours... And if there is gadolinium that shows up in a chelation test the medical community will write off the results of that test.

I would think that the presence of large amounts of gadolinium in a chelation test would skew the test to show LESS of other poisons because there’s only so much chelator available in the body and it’s wasted pulling out the gadolinium so there’s not enough to pull out the other poisons so it appears there’s less of the other poisons than there really are... Mayo says a chelation post-test showing more than 4 times the poison levels of the pre-test is significant and means there will be physical damage in the victim. My husband’s post-test showed 24 times the amount of lead, and that’s skewed because he showed massive amounts of gadolinium as well - 6 weeks after having had an MRI with gadolinium-based contrast agent.

When he was tested over a year ago he showed an IQ level that normally means a person should be institutionalized. He’s functional and at home, but never, EVER let somebody convince you that the issues I’ve been dealing with for the past 7 years are - tee-hee - an embarrassing distraction. The regime means business and they don’t care how many innocent people they destroy in the process of hiding their crimes. The coup of 2008 was literally a coup.

Nully, can you please ping your group?

Wow...more info keeps coming!

That's an interesting perspective you've got there!

I wish my perspective could reflect as hopefully as that seems to express.

What I see are corrupt, intransigent outposts in government where the Will of their Master is done despite every law or good glimpse of morality. The sychophants appointed to those posts have been trained to look for the cushy appointment, get a fat bonus, hope for the promotion, help get their acquaintances on the Left get elected, go on nice junkets with the family, lather, rinse and repeat. All for the lowly price of selling their souls, which probably was of little value to begin with--such as the DU trolls that lurk and obfuscate here at FR.

None of the transactions between Master and Slave would be based on meritorious, moral, productive services within the scope of the position they might hold. But, of course, they'd do just enough "real work" to provide cover for their paybacks (see Comey). They've learned patronage and salted it with 'a little' "if you ain't cheatin', you ain't tryin'", they see that corruption to them means increasing their chances of winning the career lotto and possibly getting the wife-and-fambly a new boat to show off at the marina.

In the case of Comey, note that H-> let slip, "But I do think--you know--having him [FBI Director Comey] say that my answers to the FBI were truthful and then I should quickly add, what I said was consistent with what I had said publicly, and ...and that's really, uh--sort of--in my view trying to tie both--uh--ends together" (emphasis mine).

"You know, having him say..." Hmmmmmmmmmm!

In the case of a governmental hoax, the job of these outposts is to distort and sit on factual information that might give up the con. They'll not deliver faithfully on FOIA requests, but do their darndest, sometimes with the most creative, cute weasle-speak, to justify what they've done or avoided doing. They'll lie if they--at all--think they can get away with it--at any level. To their bosses, those are the features of someone who's trying really hard to kiss up.

That the info appears to keep coming is the inverse of reality. Certain laws, especially FOIA, were supposedly set up to make sure there is a mandated flow of information between government and the citizenry, as if they were respectful of "Of the People, By the People and For the People."

For the corrupt, FOIA is an enforceable mechanism for gate-keeping. For them, nothing is allowed to the People except what is metered out by a potentially-corrupt gate-keeper. Lies can allowed to slip through, knowing that any truth from a well-meaning whistle-blower can be dealt with swiftly and severely. Such whistle-blowers will be taught painful lessons. Whistle-blower protections in past the two and a half decades have eroded ever increasingly to the point that current government worker conditioning is that a whistleblower is someone likely to get fired quickly if not hefty jail time as well.

Leaving aside the emotional outbursts of those who quickly blurt out truths they perceive, based on things that would never stand up in a court of law, tempered journalists are left to piece together supportable facts, then go back to get more information, not just until a proof has been identified, but until a proof is also bullet-proof.

So what looks like "info [that] keeps coming" is actually often long-overdue, precious details that have painstakingly been achieved by threaded several needles to get past the gatekeepers and re-assembled by what used to be called "investigative journalists," but are now self-identified criminals, insofar as government is concerned).

Take for example, the following:

The USCG, now beholden to the Department of Homeland Security, has twenty-seven months after the crash claimed in writing it has no record of “any (USCG) piloted craft” in the Kalaupapa area on December 11, 2013.

It’s been elsewhere copiously documented that the USCG had sent at least two Dolphin rescue helicopters, a C-130 fixed-wing Command aircraft, two Coast Guard patrol boat/cutters, two Medium Sized Rescue Boats and one "specially-equipped boat," the F/V Finback to the specified area.

The two excerpts cited middle-left below the letter are from the USCG Official Case Report #665884, received via an earlier FOIA request, which mentions all those craft about which the USCG now represents it is now unable to find relevant information. The USCG failed in its lawful duty to report this information for the FOIA request. That is, if it didn't blatantly lie!

Since the US Navy also went through a denial phase for this particular event, coming clean only much later, perhaps this has become the new standard for government intransigence, wearing out FOIA requesters by seeing justice delayed and having to jump through more hoops and appeals at every turn. Since there is proof the USCG has with this recent letter misrepresented the truth—unless perhaps like the FAA, the USCG has destroyed records—nothing more in a positive light deserves to be said.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.