Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Desk-Size Turbine Could Power a Town
MIT Technolgy Review ^ | April 11, 2016 | by David Talbot

Posted on 04/14/2016 10:59:11 AM PDT by Red Badger

Doug Hofer, a GE engineer in charge of the project, shows off a model of the turbine. =======================================================================================================

GE Global Research is testing a desk-size turbine that could power a small town of about 10,000 homes. The unit is driven by “supercritical carbon dioxide,” which is in a state that at very high pressure and up to 700 °C exists as neither a liquid nor a gas. After the carbon dioxide passes through the turbine, it's cooled and then repressurized before returning for another pass.

The unit’s compact size and ability to turn on and off rapidly could make it useful in grid storage. It’s about one-tenth the size of a steam turbine of comparable output, and has the potential to be 50 percent efficient at turning heat into electricity. Steam-based systems are typically in the mid-40 percent range; the improvement is achieved because of the better heat-transfer properties and reduced need for compression in a system that uses supercritical carbon dioxide compared to one that uses steam. The GE prototype is 10 megawatts, but the company hopes to scale it to 33 megawatts.

In addition to being more efficient, the technology could be more nimble—in a grid-storage scenario, heat from solar energy, nuclear power, or combustion could first be stored as molten salt and the heat later used to drive the process.

While such a heat reservoir could also be used to boil water to power a steam turbine, a steam system could take 30 minutes to get cranked up, while a carbon dioxide turbine might take only a minute or two—making it well-suited for on-the-spot power generation needed during peak demand periods.

GE's system might also be better than huge arrays of batteries. Adding more hours of operation just means having a larger or hotter reservoir of the molten salt, rather than adding additional arrays of giant batteries. “The key thing will come down to economics,” says Doug Hofer, the GE engineer in charge of the project. While there’s work ahead, he says, “at this point we think our economic story is favorable compared to batteries.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science
KEYWORDS: energy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Obadiah
That’s why the idea of building all these super high capacity power lines all through developed areas makes little sense given where the technology is clearly headed.

Americans love cars because they allow an individual to go wherever they want whenever they want. In other words "Freedom."

Liberals and Fascists love trains, because they go exactly where Liberals and Fascists want them to go, and they leave exactly when Liberals and Fascists want them to leave. In other words, "Total control."

21 posted on 04/14/2016 11:44:52 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
The turbine’s size, though remarkable, is not the issue. The fuel is. With the length of the fins reduced, the turbine can spool to much higher RPMs safer with less chance of destructive harmonic resonance. Were it to be made of titanium or ceramic, then it can achieve considerable internal temperatures and withstand the required pressures. BUT without the proper fuel source, one that is always available, the damned thing won’t run.

I think you mean "Working Gas", rather than fuel. It's fuel can be anything that produces heat.

22 posted on 04/14/2016 11:46:33 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Sadly, you are spot on.


23 posted on 04/14/2016 11:50:48 AM PDT by Obadiah (For the left, truth must be discarded in favor of the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
But again, the amount of energy put into compressing the CO2 will ALWAYS exceed the energy gotten out of it.

Yes, but that is not the sum total of how a heat engine works. You compress the gas, and while it is compressed, you heat it. When it is heated, it acquires more pressure and more volume than that required to compress it initially.

Heat increases volume and pressure. The increased volume and pressure produces work in excess of that required to compress the gas.

Now in order to reuse the gas, you have to cool it back down to it's former volume and temperature, and that requires cooling.

24 posted on 04/14/2016 11:51:37 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The energy still has to come from somewhere.
They're not going to get 10-33 Megawatts without a very large solar collection system or molten salt storage, big enough to completely offset the compact size of the turbine itself.
Efficiency is of course good but there is no magic here.

25 posted on 04/14/2016 11:57:04 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

A perpetual motion machine. (I suspect it will use a lot more energy than it generates. Perhaps it should be paired with a small (an acre or so) coal powered plant. )


26 posted on 04/14/2016 11:59:55 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The supercrit CO2 is a turbine driving medium, not a power source.

So what’s the power source again?


27 posted on 04/14/2016 12:14:44 PM PDT by Oberon (John 12:5-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeneta

Another economically challenged Energy program living off government grants that will never achieve real profits. I’m making parts for this loser.


28 posted on 04/14/2016 12:22:17 PM PDT by batterycommander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
“The key thing will come down to economics,” says Doug Hofer, the GE engineer in charge of the project.

What a quaint notion, Doug. You are probably in your 50s or 60s to believe such classical engineering-economics style thinking. No, the key thing is whether the white hegemonic power structure is smashed and brown people can take over to make sure men can use women's bathrooms and all microaggressions are dealt with severely.

29 posted on 04/14/2016 12:40:16 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

>>No, the key thing is whether the white hegemonic power structure is smashed and brown people can take over to make sure men can use women’s bathrooms and all microaggressions are dealt with severely. <<

What do brown ppl have to do with the tranny issue? From my time watching politics, most of that agenda has predominately been pushed by whites. From the Aids epidemic in the 80s to what is going on today.


30 posted on 04/14/2016 12:49:23 PM PDT by BJ1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Adding more hours of operation just means having a larger or hotter reservoir of the molten salt, rather than adding additional arrays of giant batteries

LFTR: http://liquidfluoridethoriumreactor.glerner.com/2012-what-is-a-lftr/

31 posted on 04/14/2016 12:59:10 PM PDT by frithguild (The warmth and goodness of Gaia is a nuclear reactor in the Earth's core that burns Thorium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ghosthost

You’re right - there’s an uncanny resemblance...


32 posted on 04/14/2016 1:05:22 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The turbine might be compact, but what about the energy source? And all the associated plumbing, etc?


33 posted on 04/14/2016 1:07:32 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

He’s not selling this as an energy source but an energy transformer. Heat to rotational energy to electricity.

It requires energy to operate just like any other turbine. The only difference is that it is more compact.


34 posted on 04/14/2016 1:14:09 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: frithguild

[ Adding more hours of operation just means having a larger or hotter reservoir of the molten salt, rather than adding additional arrays of giant batteries

LFTR: http://liquidfluoridethoriumreactor.glerner.com/2012-what-is-a-lftr/

]

The perfect power source for a Underground Colony.


35 posted on 04/14/2016 1:20:52 PM PDT by GraceG (The election doesn't pick the next president, it is an audition for "American Emperor"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

LFTR in 5 minutes

https://youtu.be/uK367T7h6ZY


36 posted on 04/14/2016 1:23:37 PM PDT by frithguild (The warmth and goodness of Gaia is a nuclear reactor in the Earth's core that burns Thorium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
The perfect power source for a Underground Colony.

Actually perfect for anyplace except for the American regulatory state, which makes such technology illegal. This is not new technology. See Wikipedia:

Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion

The General Electric program, which was based at Evendale, Ohio, was pursued because of its advantages in simplicity, reliability, suitability and quick start ability. Conventional jet engine compressor and turbine sections were used, with the compressed air run through the reactor itself to be heated by it before being exhausted through the turbine.

The US Aircraft Reactor Experiment (ARE) was a 2.5 MW thermal nuclear reactor experiment designed to attain a high power density for use as an engine in a nuclear-powered bomber. It used the molten fluoride salt NaF-ZrF4-UF4 (53-41-6 mol%) as fuel, was moderated by beryllium oxide (BeO), used liquid sodium as a secondary coolant and had a peak temperature of 860 °C. It operated for a 1000-hour cycle in 1954. It was the first molten salt reactor. Work on this project in the US stopped after ICBMs made it obsolete. The designs for its engines can currently be viewed at the EBR-I memorial building at the Idaho National Laboratory.

37 posted on 04/14/2016 1:32:13 PM PDT by frithguild (The warmth and goodness of Gaia is a nuclear reactor in the Earth's core that burns Thorium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
The Thorium Problem

https://youtu.be/tyqYP6f66Mw

38 posted on 04/14/2016 1:36:27 PM PDT by frithguild (The warmth and goodness of Gaia is a nuclear reactor in the Earth's core that burns Thorium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ghosthost

They look the same to me. All joking aside, it’s a big double standard that blacks can play whites but not vice versa.


39 posted on 04/14/2016 1:46:12 PM PDT by Crucial (At the heart all leftists is the fear that the truth is bigger than themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: camle

“...i’ve seen too many ‘miracle’ technology announcements that haven’t panned out. i’ll believe it when i see it”

That’s what’s been missing, I haven’t seen the cold fusion LENR crowd in here pushing that Italian scam artist in months.


40 posted on 04/14/2016 1:47:51 PM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson