Posted on 03/30/2016 7:11:35 AM PDT by C19fan
Those of us who’ve pledged that we will never, ever vote for Donald Trump always get the same response: “You’d put Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office instead?” Clinton’s name is spoken like an epithet, as if it’s unthinkable that any conservative would take any single action that could facilitate her election. I will not, under any circumstances, vote for Clinton, but I also do not believe that Trump would make a better president. Not because Clinton isn’t as bad as you think, but because Trump is worse than you imagine.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
The stupid. It burns!
National Review. The official Organ of the Democratic Party.
Well, Trump hasn’t committed murder or treason so there’s that.
But instead of attacking people who express this kind of opinion, why not try to convince them why they are wrong?
FUNR
Who could have anticipated another National Review hit piece on Trump?
Heavy /s
So the National Review would prefer Hillary to Trump. Unbelievable!
National Retard.
The lying rectums on NR keep digging the holes, they are in, even deeper.
They will not be able to get out of their self dug hell hole pits, when President Trump is sworn in.
See my tagline.
They are going to do ANYTHING to stop Trump...ANYTHING.
YES
HE
IS
(even Bernie is)
“National Ridiculous” and “Weekly Substandard” the official publications of self-serving establishment “conservatives” in Washington, D.C.
I would disagree that Trump isn’t better than Hillary.
Hillary would sell this nation to the highest bidder.
To paraphrase Marc Faber, Trump would just destroy the US economy. Hillary would destroy the world
But instead of attacking people who express this kind of opinion, why not try to convince them why they are wrong?
..........................................................
Can you name one prominent media personality (over eternity) who was transformed by someone using your strategy?
That worked so Good , he lost 5 Million Evangelicals who stayed at home.
Any Republican publication endorses a Democrat who most Republicans think she should be indicted is a nut case.
They may end up backing a serial Adulterer.
The Editor went Stalin yesterday, it's the people who count the votes not the voters who count.
Bottom line If Donald Trump loses he goes to a Great life and the writers at the National Review will wonder if they have a job much longer and can't afford anything Trump owns, Rich Lowry afford to buy a Trump residence, join a Trump Golf Course and I doubt he afford to stay at a Trump Hotel.
Oh? How could he be worse?
Both will lead to scenes like that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.