Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump’s Alliance With the National Enquirer
NY Mag.com ^ | October 30, 2015 12:50 p.m. | Gabriel Sherman

Posted on 03/28/2016 2:28:58 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-130 next last
To: stratboy

Lets go further with facts for some on here who support cruz and seem unable to address facts.

Cruz came third in 3 important swing states.
Never won a single county in two of those FL, VA.

Yep sure thing Clinton is quaking at the thought of seeing a guy who has come third in 3 swing states and can’t even win a single county in two of them.
sarc


61 posted on 03/28/2016 3:06:57 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

There is no “if” about it. I’m sure you saw the thread posting Pecker’s contributions to Mrs Cosby so don’t pretend there is any doubt about this.


62 posted on 03/28/2016 3:07:01 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Durbin
Trump loves Pecker. So do his supporters.

I don't have much respect for the peddling of sex rumors in tabloids. But I have less for pointless vulgarity and taunting between the Trump and Cruz camps.

Not saying all of the points each side bring up are pointless and vulgar. Not saying that one side does it and the other doesn't, both sides have been making both thoughtful posts, and some thoughtless vulgar posts like the one above.

Just picking your post as an example. You are not the worst (I think my posts are wonderful for example ;-) ). And I realize you probably are reacting to something somebody else said and pissed you off and such. But it all adds nothing to the debate as to who to support, it is just about mocking other people who will get mad and mock you back. Let us not act like the left here people.

63 posted on 03/28/2016 3:07:40 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stratboy

Trump didn’t have to leak allegations. I am sure the creative writers at the National Enquirer can save their ol’ buddy the trouble.


64 posted on 03/28/2016 3:07:41 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

Very well said .

If we are to have a debate then stop the bots and name calling, post facts, and have an honest debate.

Just throwing out garbage doe snot add anything to this site in my opinion of course.


65 posted on 03/28/2016 3:09:16 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: stratboy

The delusion is yours. The National Enquirer has slammed every GOP candidate except Trump (the Hillary (for senate) Donor). See a little clearer now?


66 posted on 03/28/2016 3:09:50 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
Nah. I'm just mostly trying to get your heads to explode. It's amusing to see the "holier than thou" crowd go into wild panic at the thought of their boy having feet of clay.

I think, yeah, she probably was involved with Cruz, but I'm officially neutral until it's proven.

I suppose it really doesn't matter that much to me, other than entertainment value. I'm probably not voting for Cruz under any circumstances.

However... mistress or not, her commentary has been over-the-top biased.

67 posted on 03/28/2016 3:12:07 PM PDT by TontoKowalski (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: deport

We’ll see. I guess it depends on how things turn out this year.


68 posted on 03/28/2016 3:13:06 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Trump and his dad were some of Reagan’s best money raisers.

In one of Trump's books, Trump basically tells Jimmy Carter than Reagan was a con artist.

Records Show Scant Reagan-Trump Ties

Trump Tells Joan Rivers Reagan Tax Cuts Were Disaster That Hirt Economy

69 posted on 03/28/2016 3:14:18 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
You mean Trump's only been a Republican for 30 years?

Shocking!

70 posted on 03/28/2016 3:14:44 PM PDT by TontoKowalski (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The story and a picture of them with Ronnie was posted here, find it if you want. I don’t really care.

BTW can you explain how a man who has gotten 1/3 of Trump’s total votes from a semi-conservative electorate could possibly win with a semi-socialist one?

Please explain this to me.

In addition show me how Cruz can win delegates from the states left to vote for the nomination. NY, NJ, CA, Ore, Wash, wisc and Penns. Trump only needs 52-57% of their delegates. Explain how it is that he doesn’t get them and more.

I don’t understand your thinking when these things seem so clear.


71 posted on 03/28/2016 3:14:48 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

If you’re trying to pin the demise of the Carson candidacy on Trump, I suggest you go look at Ted Cruz’s good buddy, Amanda Carpenter’s tweets on Feb. 1, 2 full hours before the story “broke” on CNN, where she said Carson was suspending his campaign after Iowa.


72 posted on 03/28/2016 3:16:06 PM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

“Ronald Reagan is another example. He is so smooth and so effective a performer that he completely won over the American people,” Trump wrote. “Only now, nearly seven years later, are people beginning to question whether there’s anything beneath that smile.” - 1987 D Trump, Art of the Deal


73 posted on 03/28/2016 3:20:30 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

....this unnamed person....according to a reliable source.

Enough already!! Make it stop!


74 posted on 03/28/2016 3:20:45 PM PDT by mouse1 (Je Suis Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

And Cruz told Jeff Roe to get the pics and make the ad.


75 posted on 03/28/2016 3:21:03 PM PDT by stratboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Stupid, stupid conspiracy. Trump has no reason to push this story when he will have enough delegates to get the GOP nomination by their CURRENT rules. (We all know they’re going to try some last-minute rule changing BS to deny Trump the nomination, but this will backfire on them horribly.)

Cruz is irrelevant at this stage, and Trump is rightfully regarding him as such.


76 posted on 03/28/2016 3:22:56 PM PDT by Objective Scrutator (All liberals are criminals, and all criminals are liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Since the issue is Cruz philandering, does ANYONE truly think that ALL of the accusations are false?

The rest of the GOP field was a target rich environment. Two who weren’t even eligible, one who had never run anything bigger than a hospital department, one who ran a major corporation into the ground, one who makes a dishrag look charismatic, a couple who could garner NO support (Huck and RS), Bush looking like a big guppy, some there just for the campaign contributions. Trump is a towering figure in that menagerie.


77 posted on 03/28/2016 3:23:23 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
See a little clearer now

The only thing I'm seeing is that you are desperate to grasp at anything that will keep Cruz above the fray. That is called being delusional.

78 posted on 03/28/2016 3:23:51 PM PDT by stratboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski

No, in 1999 He registered as an Independent. In 2001, he registered as a Democrat. Since 2009, he switched three times, I think.


79 posted on 03/28/2016 3:24:34 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

It’s like he’s trying to 1984 the whole primary and blame everything done by Cruz on Trump. Deflection has left the building. Now its denial. I can’t wait until we get to acceptance.


80 posted on 03/28/2016 3:26:07 PM PDT by stratboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson