Posted on 02/19/2016 2:51:08 PM PST by Lucky9teen
An exposé on Donald Trump where Dana Loesch reveals how Donald Trump has long time connections with organized crime in almost all of his partnerships, his always changing and never constant stance on the 2nd amendment, and how he is basically controlled by the banks who he depends on for his big business deal ventures.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Yeah, but would you eat the peanuts out of her poop?
Good grief, you need to turn in your secret objectivist decoder ring and get a new screen name!
Nope. Just correcting the falsehoods. That doesn’t phase me at all.
False.
Again, ignoring his own words, from his interviews, his rallies, his books, etc and the people who actually worked with him....does not make it any less of the truth.
Cruz never was for TPP. And he was mistaken and mislead on TPA. He admitted it, explained it and changed his mind before the vote, hence his no vote on TPA.
staten island it’s easy to be a conservative.
NYC, especially COLLEGE, forget about it
After 31 years of employment at a Fortune 15 megacorporation my program and project management job went to Eastern Europe when I was RIFfed.
But that is the other issue Trump will fight to change. Outsourcing and offshoring our jobs all over the world.
I have seen this firsthand and it makes me furious. Our entire AP department was shipped to India. Some of the people had been there for many years and never even broke 30k...and the company now makes billions and billions.
This is not an American company - it’s a global company - there is no loyalty to anything but the stock price. They don’t even pretend to be pro-American.
Tuco Bad!
Trump owns commercial real estate with mortgages and his loan to value ratio is quite very healthy
Prolly less than 45%
I’m envious
Cruz borrowed money from his wife’s firm guaranteed on the arm for his campaigns and if he paid it back he did so from the money from other future contributors like a POLITICIAN would ....it’s not like they earned it
Trumps is for assets he and his family of companies own
It’s not comparable
Cruz’s business experience is minimal except as a passive investor in sweetheart deals where his end was optioned to him with no or little need of his own money invested
The way politicians usually earn beyond legislative or executive governmental salaries
I don’t fault him given they almost all do it
Bernie Sanders prolly doesn’t and another ultralib from my era...Phillip Hart probably didn’t either
Trumps financials are damn good today ...just the Trump name branding cash flow if capitalized at a hard rate of say 10 still makes him a billionaire from that alone forget all the dirt and bricks and mortar and cash flow from all those buildings and developments
It’s amazing.....maybe 40 more folks worldwide with larger equity real estate portfolios than his
There was a time when ‘class envy’ was a liberal character flaw.
Class envy has always been real here trust me
I ain’t rich but folks see my homepage and I get some tacky remarks some time
Truly rich folks can’t spend time freeping like most Freepers freep
I am curious as to HOW he paid back more than a MILLION DOLLARS in such a short time? news report say that they liquidated assets to pay for his Senate bid, and their salary isn't enough. His wife is supposedly on leave from her G-S job. Does she still receive her salary? Do they still have the big house and other living expenses with keeping two residences (one in TX, other in DC)? Inquiring minds want to know!
Teddy Bare is just another lying lawyer. I don't think Teddy can be trusTED!
You are right of course, but it sure is highlighted every time these so called Christians rag out Trump... I look at it like this, none takes with them a thin dime when they return to the Maker that sent them... And the Maker sometimes gives or takes. Every last one of God's children will get to have that one on one face to face with the Maker soon.. or later....
Thou shall not covet still ranks right up there with the other 9... I would rather have Trump on the right side of politics than have him running against US... and what an education to what is politically required to be a businessman... Everybody from the local mayor all the way up to presidential candidate out passing the plate... so the businessman can earn a living and even create jobs...
These career politicians could not run a hot dog stand.
So, Ted Cruz voted to harm our national sovereignty and obliterate the legislative obligations of Congress because he was mislead?
Do you have any idea how lame that sounds? Neville Chamberlain was mislead about Germany brought on WWII. Even if Ted Cruz had been born in the USA he would still be persona non grata for that only where I come from.
Putting Congress in Charge on Trade - By Paul Ryan and Ted Cruz
How can a freshman Senator be mislead about TPA and still write an OP-ED piece with Paul Ryan for The Wall Street Journal urging its passing?
Ted Cruz was not tricked into voting for TPA, that's just another Cruz lie.
Senator Ted Cruz voted for Cloture on TPA Fast track trade authority removing the hurdle and concern of further amendments and clearing the way for passage. Again, like “unanimous consent” cloture votes are not recorded roll call votes. Thereby Ted Cruz could obfuscate his support. He figured to hide, see how that works?
However, Cruz advocacy could not be hidden entirely. On another bill HR 1314 Cruz voted against an amendment to the Trade Deal that would require congress to be consulted if China (or other nations) were to join after the fact:
Senate Amendment 1251 "To require the approval of Congress before additional countries may join the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement"...
Cruz voted NAY. Directly saying he did not want congress to be consulted before other countries, namely CHINA, could join TPP.• Notice during November's debate Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz were saying China is not part of TPP; contrast their voices against Donald Trump who was honestly saying TPP carries a backdoor for China (and Russia) to join.
Donald Trump was entirely correct. Senator Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz were factually incorrect. They were not incorrect by accident, but rather by complicit ideology.
BOTTOM LINE – It might hurt Cruz supporters to admit what took place, and worse – to accept the transparency of motive behind what drove his decision making; but it makes no sense at all to ignore the truth of what took place.
Yes, Unfortunately Ted Cruz Did Support Trans-Pacific Trade Deal (TPA) - With Video...
They are pro-Wall Street - Globalist Cabal - Power Brokers with the unwavering allegiance and support of Ted Cruz.
A friend went on and on about how much he hates Trump (not statesman-like enough for him) and finally he realized I’m a Trump supporter. My comment was “he is the only one standing up for the American worker”.
I don’t care about Trump’s tone - which I think will change once he is no longer campaigning anyway. I care about protecting our jobs, controlling our spending, both of which go with controlling our immigration which also goes with probably the biggest issue of all, being safe in our own country....one thing the federal government is absolutely supposed to do.
We are being overrun on purpose with people who will never care about our culture, our constitution or anything else that has meant being an American.
One issue was not the loan. The issue was that he neglected to list the loan on his candidacy paperwork. The concern about GS "owing" Senator Cruz is because it provided some of his campaign financing and also because his wife works there, giving GS great leverage over the Cruzes.
you tell me how Trump is owned by the banks he STILL OWES money to.....for NUMEROUS loans.
Because you're trying to compare apples to oranges, and trying to make a legitimate way of financing a real estate property into something immoral; but it is not.
Do you have a mortgage? Almost everyone who buys a house in the U.S. gets a mortgage, and most have a car loan, as well. Mortgages are secured loams; that is, the property itself is collateral for the loan. Also, most Americans have credit cards as well, and many carry a balance on those cards from month to month, accumulating high interest payments. This is an unsecured loan, and the cost of such a loan is much higher, because there is no collateral. Yet most Americans carry these risky loans; they also carry mortgage and car payments, which involve the bank taking back the property if they don't pay the loans. There's nothing immoral in these arrangemtns, as long as people have a job or other means to pay them off. Your car loan and your motgage are contracts and they do not give the bank the power to influence how you vote, for instance.
So, your position that Trump is somehow immoral for having mortgages on many of his properties is unnecessary, because not only are the properties probably being used as collateral to secure the loans; but also, most of his properties contain residences, offices and retail spaces that pay monthy rentals, so there is an income stream that pays the mortgage, taxes, insurance and most likely also some profit. The mortgage contract is already a done deal, and the bank cannot use it to make the proterty owner vote a certain way.
This use of money at interest is a fundamental of capitalism and free markets, and it is a way capital can be maximized so that the owner can develop more property, providing more jobs and residences, offices and retail spaces.
The system you seem to be advocating, where there are no loans and no interest on loans and no trust, just a system of cash on the barrelhead, is called shari'a law. That's how muslims do finance; and that's one of the reasons they have remained medieval and undeveloped.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.