Posted on 02/19/2016 2:51:08 PM PST by Lucky9teen
An exposé on Donald Trump where Dana Loesch reveals how Donald Trump has long time connections with organized crime in almost all of his partnerships, his always changing and never constant stance on the 2nd amendment, and how he is basically controlled by the banks who he depends on for his big business deal ventures.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Where do you get your information, because it’s false.
Cruz had one GS loan, that he put up his own assets to secure. He did not liquidate anything, unless that’s how they called it, in order to finance the loan. But he DID give up his personal assets in order to finance the loan.
And he did pay it back. And woopdie doo, he didn’t report it on ONE form. Good grief.
For people who take Trump, with the long list of blemishes and true corruption that surrounds him, and try to bash Cruz over these truly insignificant things, that aren’t revealing anything about his “character” as you are trying to claim, shows the type of people that support Trump. Hypocritical doesn’t even cover it.
I don’t trust Trump any farther than I can pick him up and throw him, but I’m a homer.
Cruz is my guy, in spite of all that flack he has been getting lately in the media and on this forum. That just means he is over the target.
Buena suerta amigo, it is going to be a long campaign season, full of hate and vicious people.
Dana Bash-Trump Loesch and her husband take bailouts.
Even Chuck C Johnson(who’s a Cruz guy) says shes a fraud.
Hey did ya’ll hear about the Islamville, SC muslims crying they feel unsafe.
hmm, try being Yazidi in syria
He had two loans from Goldman Sachs. During the campaign he dramatically told the voters how he and his wife had decided to liquidate their assets, which means to sell them off, not borrow against them — that is called collateral.
He neglected to mention to the voters of Texas that he was a Canadian citizen.
I could go on, but that is probably all you an deal with. And, by the way, it is not necessary to believe me; google it.
“Trump wants to ban Muslim immigration. That sold me”
Trump SAYS he wants to ban Muslim immigration. He will and does say anything to get what he wants. Don’t be a one issue lemming.
The issue of Islam is the number one issue.
Although the proposals in the paper are a mild call for general hemispheric economic cooperation with no formal structure, the conspiracy-inclined have interpreted it as a sinister conspiracy to destroy American sovereignty and combine us into a single union with Canada and Mexico. They are inherently suspicious of the Council on Foreign Relations, despite its repeated claims to be politically neutral and solely interested in studying issues objectively. It has become a lynchpin in globalist conspiracy theories and anything associated with it immediately looks more sinister in some eyes.
The paper is basically benign, pointing to ways that the nations of North America could work together through free markets and reducing trade barriers to spread more success and raise up the economies of the poorer countries. In its concluding section it says:
"North America is different from other regions of the world and must find its own cooperative route forward. A new North American community should rely more on the market and less on bureaucracy, more on pragmatic solutions to shared problems than on grand schemes of confederation or union, such as those in Europe. We must maintain respect for each other's national sovereignty."
Which certainly doesn't sound all that terrible, what with acknowledging how different North America is from Europe, promoting market solutions instead of government and explicitly rejecting the idea of a "confederation or union" while promoting respect for national sovereignty. It's almost like the conspiracy theorists never read the document, or gave up after the title and wrote a fantasy version in their heads based solely on the title and their obsession with the CFR.
Admittedly, there are plenty of bad ideas in the report. It's full of proposals for government managed trade and incentive programs and inter-governmental cooperation for regulation and security. It's all stuff which makes sense if you think government is the way to solve problems, but not something which would resonate with true conservatives. Yet the big irony here is that it appears that Heidi Cruz doesn't even agree with those aspects of the report for which she is being blamed.
Heidi Cruz' role in all of this was as one of a large panel of readers and her sole identifiable contribution to the project is a one-paragraph response in the final appendix in which she says:
"We must emphasize the imperative that economic investment be led and perpetuated by the private sector. There is no force proven like the market for aligning incentives, sourcing capital, and producing results like financial markets and profit-making businesses. This is simply necessary to sustain a higher living standard for the poorest among us - truly the measure of our success. As such, investment fundsand financing mechanisms should be deemed attractive instruments by those committing the capital and should only be developed in conjunction with market participants."
So basically, her role here is to say that free markets and free trade are the answer to greater regional prosperity. I find it hard to believe that any conservative or republican would disagree with this or condemn her for believing it, and it's positively bizarre to see someone who is as much of a globalist insider as Dewhurst raising this sort of argument.
The whole idea that Heidi Cruz is part of some grand conspiracy is patently ridiculous. It's guilt by association and by innuendo from people who don't understand the CFR or the report which they so revile and who assume that anyone who may have been in a room with Robert Pastor or William Weld must be some sort of globalist stooge. The reality is that the CFR draws on a diverse pool of experts, most of whom have very little involvement in the organization and that its output, like this paper, tends to be in the form of general suggestions with no force behind them which no one ever really acts on. We certainly aren't plunging headlong into any kind of regional union on the basis of one paper which no one seems to have read.
It’s funny, I voted early today
I didn’t see a Democrat in site.
Even the 1 black guy that ambushed me in the parking lot was a TP.
I thought maybe he’s being paid because all the other vultures were running local Constable, Sheriff, DA, and Judge folks and their families.
Their were vultures everywhere.
Next time I’m going to the feed store to but some slunk smell to keep them away.
“Face it Cruz has no charisma,”
...and the red-in-the-face bellowing loudmouth insulter has?
Yes, he certainly has the charisma of an intelligent, thoughtful, balanced, warm future president.
Listen, you are getting all worked up over nothing.
I guarantee you will not convince a Trump voter your way.
Chill, your BP is ripping.
Just carry a copy of the Constitution, that will assplode some heads, fo sho.
Has it ever occurred to you or any other Trump basher that Trump supporters have researched their candidate, with an open mind, and that is why they support him?
Has it ever occurred to you that some of us have also researched Ted Cruz, with an open mind, and that is why we don’t support him?
The one, went tits up four times....
Corporate bankruptcy is not the same as personal bankruptcy
Really. We’re going to go early early, so I can squeeze a few errands before we hit the yardwork. Hope it’s not packed.
We have our share of conservatives (well, almost) but it’s more like democrat city.
Our usual polling place is so close, it would be a nice walk- but because it’s early voting, it’ll be a little ways off.
Dude, are you like 13? Sanders appeals to the yutes. Not Trump, I gar-on-tee. The young peeps look at Trump and giggle at his hair. Ask my retarded stepson and his pals.
Bernie is going nowhere. Its going to be Hillary
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/10/20/4chan-4-trump.html And your wrong, Trump has huge support among young males
“I wish we had a more recent poll for this; the last one showed Trump at 60% negative opinion and 27% second choice. That is big trouble in the general.”
This is speculation but PIAPS also has very high negatives. Thus in a general election I think the negatives might balance out. I also think that it is too far from the general election for the polls to mean much. Lots can change in 18 months.
I early votes Cruz today. As far as I’m concerned for me, there is no conflict. The deck will play as it does.
I’m just sorry for the fighting.
It aint gonna change Trump to Cruz or Cruz to Trump.
The enemy is Hillary/Sanders, who with all the voting and delegate problems will be the Dem ticket.
We have conservatives who say they are conservatives but run and hide and give Obama everything he wants.
Either vote more of the same or vote Trump
I am going to take my chances with Trump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.