Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/02/2016 4:11:20 PM PST by springwater13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: springwater13

Try this on for size that fits all ..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqgkBuRic0Q


2 posted on 02/02/2016 4:12:45 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

” It’s amazing that Trump still came within a few percentage points on a shoestring operation.”

Yes, and wait until next week to see if your gloating wasn’t premature.


3 posted on 02/02/2016 4:12:57 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

If Trump won and Rubio placed 2nd, it would be a worse situation.

I can’t believe Jeb and all these idiots are staying in the race.

I think most of the RINOs are happy with at least 4 years of Clinton as long as they can spurn Rubio or whoever pissed them off.


4 posted on 02/02/2016 4:13:00 PM PST by ObamahatesPACoal (Savage BLASTS Megyn Kelly, Fox News Over Treatment Of Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

Yes lets be like Cruz who will take money for anything to get ahead. Wonderful. That is all we need a guy who will do anything for money.

Trump doesn’t need anybody’s money. I think that is better.


5 posted on 02/02/2016 4:13:20 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

1. Cruz had most votes ever. Big ground game. A unique election nationally.

2. Skipping the debate. An error. Lot of people make up their minds the week of or even day of (!) the election. Those broke to Rubio.


6 posted on 02/02/2016 4:13:38 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

“if Trump didn’t want to self-fund tens of millions of dollars for infrastructure comparable to Cruz, all he really had to do was ask.”

AKA. His bloated ego got in the way.


7 posted on 02/02/2016 4:14:08 PM PST by Durbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

I don’t think the issue is cheap, I think it’s arrogance. Trump was certain he would win. He LIVES by polls and the fake polls showed him winning so he hung his hat on it. Further, he had big crowds at events and thought that translated into votes and, obviously, it does not.


9 posted on 02/02/2016 4:14:40 PM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

He’s not stupid enough to spend his own money on the campaign. And he really doesn’t have enough money to do the full presidential campaign. Yeah


10 posted on 02/02/2016 4:14:44 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

He’s spending his own money so he’s being frugal, not cheap.
Iowa was always a crap shoot for him.
Watch what happens going forward.
Iowa has always been an anomoly for Republicans.
The winner is usually NOT the nominee.


12 posted on 02/02/2016 4:16:25 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

14 posted on 02/02/2016 4:16:50 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

Agreed. There was a guy on the radio here in SF, big Trump fan, who said that he was told by the campaign that they didn’t need a rep in his caucus, then when he got there, and they asked for a rep from each campaign, there wasn’t anybody there to speak for Trump.

But don’t speak too soon. The Iowa caucuses have never really been a good indicator on the Republican side. Cruz could easily end up the 2016 equivalent of Santorum and Huckabee. Trump may have effectively kept his powder dry in order to focus on the upcoming states.


15 posted on 02/02/2016 4:16:53 PM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

Exactly right, the wealthy invest other people’s money, not their own. His Cheapness will cost him the nomination.


17 posted on 02/02/2016 4:17:23 PM PST by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

Trump’s biggest problem is not that Cruz beat him by 4 percentage points,
especially after the monumental effort Cruz put into Iowa.

His big problem is that Rubio came within 1 percentage point of his support. So,
he lose from above and below.


19 posted on 02/02/2016 4:18:24 PM PST by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

No competitive candidate is losing the nomination because of Iowa. It’s picked only 2 of 6 GOP nominees in the last six races where no incumbent was running.


21 posted on 02/02/2016 4:18:33 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13
There is a strategy for winning each state and also each phase of the primary. For IA, it is having a strong ground game and also going to all the little corners of the state and meeting with the people.

Cruz did not have huge rallies, however, he traveled to a lot of small towns and met with people at small venues. Not very exciting, but a sound strategy for IA.

24 posted on 02/02/2016 4:20:41 PM PST by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

I agree with you. Trump does one of two things at this point. He realizes this is a live fire exercise and fights to win, or he shrugs it off and leaves the arena for those who are serious.

I hope the latter. He is the only one changing the dynamics or the rotted and suffocating system. Winning the election will be easier than shifting the accumulated dung of the uniparty and the spooks.


26 posted on 02/02/2016 4:21:02 PM PST by Psalm 144 (This primary is raw Americana! Tom Sawyer versus Sid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

Cruz had a huge Army.

And only won by 6000 votes.

Only 3.75 votes per Caucus location
(6000 / 1600 locations)
Not that impressive.


35 posted on 02/02/2016 4:26:06 PM PST by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittancez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

So....if Trump wins NH, what will you attribute that to?
Spending almost nothing compared to Bush, Cruz & Rubio?


36 posted on 02/02/2016 4:26:11 PM PST by entropy12 (Trump - NOT funded by Goldman Sachs. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

Almost all winners of the nomination lose in Iowa.

It means little.


38 posted on 02/02/2016 4:26:26 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (As a representative of Earth, I officially welcome Global Warming to our planet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: springwater13

so kid, Jebbie should win ???


39 posted on 02/02/2016 4:26:51 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson