Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Republic 2016 Caucus Open Discussion Thread XIV
Free Republic ^ | 2 February 2016 | Windflier

Posted on 02/01/2016 9:03:57 PM PST by Windflier

DO NOT VOTE ON THIS THREAD.

This is the nightly DISCUSSION thread for the ongoing 2016 Free Republic Caucus. Per caucus rules, no comments are allowed on the caucus thread itself - hence this open chat thread.

If you'd like to vote in the caucus, please look in the sidebar for the link, or check downthread here.

Thanks, and let 'er rip!

Windy


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2016election; elections; frcaucus; frcaucus2016
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: entropy12; All

“any conservative laws passed?”

With a rabid leftist President signing such bills, there was never an opportunity to do so.

“Ran anything in private sector which survives by not losing money?”

Most people are not business owners, not a fair question, but since you mentioned it, FOUR OF THE CORPORATIONS run by Trump went bankrupt.

“Any jobs created by himself?”

Moot question because Cruz is not a business owner.

“Any friends in 99 Senate colleagues?”

Aren’t those colleagues the GOPe everyone here rants and raves about, but you criticize Cruz for having no friends among them. that is a point in Cruz’s favor.


81 posted on 02/02/2016 8:51:17 AM PST by txnativegop (Tired of liberals, even a few in my own family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing

Next Tuesday night we return to reality in NH. LOL!


82 posted on 02/02/2016 9:03:15 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: txnativegop

So what conservative laws president Cruz proposes will be passed by the congress?

Can you name TWO?


83 posted on 02/02/2016 9:09:16 AM PST by entropy12 (Trump - NOT funded by Goldman Sachs. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: txnativegop

Four out of 100+ businesses went bankrupt?
That means Trump was batting 0.960
That beats Babe Ruth by a mile?

Do you know anything about business startups?
Do you know 90% of new businesses fail?

The ignorance is palpable.


84 posted on 02/02/2016 9:12:26 AM PST by entropy12 (Trump - NOT funded by Goldman Sachs. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

You asked questions that I provided correct and truthful answers to.

I doubt seriously trump has started that many new, distinct businesses. His specialty is real estate development, and unless the construction of each building was a separate business the 100+ claim is doubtful.

But you only offered retaliation on one of the four questions which you posed and I answered, interesting.


85 posted on 02/02/2016 9:25:18 AM PST by txnativegop (Tired of liberals, even a few in my own family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I have no idea, and that will be dependent upon the US Congress and its’ constituency in any case.


86 posted on 02/02/2016 9:27:34 AM PST by txnativegop (Tired of liberals, even a few in my own family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I don’t care how much Trump wants to usher in some sort of “new era” in politics - not every vestige of the existing system is necessarily wrong. Ground game matters, and Trump continues to be this disorganized and pathetic on the ground, he’s going to need to be +10 in polling to breathe easy in any state.

And for those who want to complain that Iowa isn’t predictive, Cruz isn’t Huckabee or Santorum. Both of them took an all-or-nothing gamble on Iowa, hoping to piggy-back fundraising and organization off of the win. Cruz already has the organization and the funding in place. He may not do well in New Hampshire (then again, he might), but he’s well placed in South Carolina, Nevada, and most of the “SEC Primary” states.

Now that the veneer of the “invincible” Trump is off, can Trump maintain his double-digit polling leads? I doubt it, but that may just be hope talking.


87 posted on 02/02/2016 9:33:57 AM PST by kevkrom (I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The playground rules have been changed.

“Paradigm Shift” is a term we would have used 15-20 years ago.

Hitler didn’t move to the middle, it’s not necessary .

Figure it out. Substitute FDR, JFK, etc.

Nationalism plays well to the home crowd in the 7th inning


88 posted on 02/17/2016 7:27:21 PM PST by One Name (Ultimately, the TRUTH is a razor's edge and no man can sit astride it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson