Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't like Cruz or Trump? Not going to vote?...Well....
Imgur ^ | 1/22/2016 | Predictions

Posted on 01/22/2016 5:42:14 PM PST by Dallas59



This could be the next 4 years.
No matter who the GOP nominates...just vote for em.
Don't get all stiff necked and shut down just because your fave candidate didn't get picked....

It can get a whole lot worse....

< /rant


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Education; Society
KEYWORDS: 2017; clintonjulian; commiesanders; demonicrats; evilhillary; president; rinosvdestruction
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 last
To: SZonian

I guess you also propose voting write in candidates that elect democrats?

Some character you have!


141 posted on 01/23/2016 4:53:00 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag
Hypothetical proposition ABC -- vote "yes" on it, and you vote for tax-subsidized television; vote "no" on it, and you vote against tax subsidized television.

Vote yes on Proposition DEF, which means voting in favor of expanding TV broadcast's on-air spectrum (just hypothetical), and you will NOT be voting "against" proposition ABC. The only way to vote "against" ABC is to vote FOR saying no; the only way to vote "against" DEF is to vote FOR saying no.

There was ZERO place on the ballot for saying "no" to either Obama OR Romney in 2012. There was ONLY a place to say "yes" to something else. GET IT THROUGH YOUR HEAD!! For the love of God!!!!

You only get to vote FOR -- voting "against" is totally 100 percent fiction.

Your vote in '08, like mine, was a vote FOR McCain no matter how much we emotionally intended it to be "against" Obama. Your vote for Romney in '12 was a vote FOR Romney. My vote for a 3rd party candidate I knew would lose, was a vote FOR conservatism and what my vote achieved was to reduce the vote counts of both major candidates and reduce the popular mandate of whichever leftist won. That is what I voted FOR -- to weaken whichever leftist won.

Others, who voted for Romney "against" Obama, voted FOR turning the Republican party left. If you say you voted "against," all it means is that you don't want to be accountable for what you voted for.

Saying two plus two = 5 is false no matter how many times you say it. As is saying you voted "against" the Democrat by voting for the Republican. No, all you did was vote for the Republican.

142 posted on 01/23/2016 4:53:29 PM PST by Finny (Voting "against" is a wish. Be ready to own what you vote for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Finny you and Norm can deflect and distract all you want.
The real liars are YOU! Both of you clowns!

You claim you’re “conservative”. You claim you want “conservative principles” and then vote for WRITE IN’S every single freaking time when you know damn well they don’t have a chance in hell to win $hit.

You both might as well have pulled the lever for Obama. Distract all you want about me voting dem, when in fact you both are the ones actually doing it by throwing your God-Given votes to Losers incapable of winning.

Keep it up this year. Maybe...just maybe a President Sanders will get elected if enough of you retards pull this again and we’ll see what real tyranny, martial law, and civil war is all about.


143 posted on 01/23/2016 4:58:28 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Sanders vs Trump = communism vs chrony capitalism.

Winner take all. screws over America.

Fixed it for you.

144 posted on 01/23/2016 4:59:30 PM PST by Tramonto (Trump controls the dialog with a first grade vocabulary. He is a stupid genius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

You admitted yourself that you voted for a loser 3rd party candidate which means = Obama vote.

What’s not to understand about that?


145 posted on 01/23/2016 5:00:55 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Want my address ONYX?

PM me....


146 posted on 01/23/2016 5:02:08 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal

I vote for conservatives. Not real concerned with your take on it.


147 posted on 01/23/2016 6:17:44 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - An idea whose time has come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

And of course your definition of “conservative” is all that counts.

What a joke!


148 posted on 01/23/2016 6:37:52 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal

Like I said. I’m not real concerned with your take on it.


149 posted on 01/23/2016 8:21:11 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - An idea whose time has come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal

You are guessing and guessing wrong. It’s about your shallow minded and childish behavior.

Listen up troll, projection is unbecoming in normal circles, but I will note that lately, lots of things are being allowed.

This kind of garbage may go over well with your cabal, but it is exactly that, GARBAGE.

Posts like yours are GARBAGE and serve no useful purpose other than to inflame.

So piss off.


150 posted on 01/24/2016 9:50:57 AM PST by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: SZonian

You talk projection and then call me a troll and THEN....call me shallow minded and childish?

Looked in the mirror lately Mr. Pot?

“So piss off”

Request denied!


151 posted on 01/24/2016 2:16:40 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: ubaldus

You keep saying you are for Clinton over Trump.

Either you must be seeking attention.
Having a baby tantrum.
Still fighting the cold war .
Trolling.
Just not understanding anything when you can’t even think a socialist, yes a frigging socialist might not be as bad as Trump


152 posted on 02/26/2016 7:53:29 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson