Posted on 11/06/2015 6:01:05 AM PST by C19fan
Most women are either bisexual or gay but "never straight", a study suggests. Research has found that though lesbians are much more attracted to the female form, most women who say they are straight are in fact aroused by videos of both naked men and naked women.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
Time to face the truth boldly.
Why? Because the examination of eye-dialation is THIS powerful — no secrets cannot be uncovered, not even to hide secret passions.
If you want to keep terrorists, thieves, rapists, murderers, drug runners, human traffikers, class warfare goons, etc. out of US borders ...?
This is the technique we should apply — study eye dialation to determine who is capable of peaceful assimilation among Christians and Jews in the USA.
More than that — who we should educate here in the USA. Why educate a potential terrorist with chemistry courses, etc?
Regarding Article:
“Of those who identified as being straight, 74pc [%] were aroused by videos of attractive men and women.
Based on eye dialation. Very low-tech research and time-tested to be accurate. Eye dialation is used by professional interrogators and even during some of the more stringent job interviews.
Bottom line — women can be debauched merely through what they see.
Guess what? They can already be chemically debauched, just as men can.
I believe you. The headline was ‘shock-jock’. Of women who id themselves as straight, 26 percent actually are straight. You were most likely raised to be a good, decent lady, just as 26 percent are.
“That has nothing to do with any sort of sexual arousal. He and the authors of the study fail to differentiate beauty from sex.”
Excellent point. Beauty is aesthetic. My eyes undoubtedly dialate when I see Autumn leaves, but that doesn’t mean that I am aroused by them. The level of dialation might need to be scrutinized.
“Bottom line, the vast majority of women are straight.”
The obesity and advanced age of most lesbians certainly backs up your point. Of course, that could be due to cultural conditioning [playing devil’s advocate].
Now for the next point ...
Eye dialation is the foundation of the study. I’m no expert on eye dialation, but I would imagine that pupils can narrow during a feeling of competition just as easily as widen. If the ‘competition’ is ugly, then perhaps her eyes would dialite. If the competition is pretty, wouldn’t the pupils narrow?
Point 3
You’ll like this one. Eyes can dialate from an aesthetic appreciation of beauty. Do autumn leaves arouse people? I doubt that happens very often. But eyes would dialate from sunrises, high game scores, etc.
A better line:
How am I going to break this news to my wives?
I resemble that remark!
Thank you, Arthur. I just hope that the correct number is more than 26 percent.
LMAO, ok Daily Mail, whatever you say. I’d say the opposite, their are no true dykes who aren’t missing a gene or 2 like Rosie O’Donnell.
It’s genetic damage, usually combined with environmental factors.
Care to explain this one a little better, for all to hear?
“and the only reason men don’t get pregnant after anal sex is because of outdated, oppressive beliefs the religious zealots try and push on us.”
Did you forget a sarc tag?
I didn't think I needed one, but in these confusing times I guess I do. But seriously, I have seen forum discussions with young college kids who actually do believe that a man who thinks he's a woman actually IS a woman in virtually ever way... including reproductive capabilities.
They cite articles like this as their proof: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/10/pregnant-man-thomas-beati_n_457478.html
Sadly, pretty much those exact words really are used by the left.
So a sarc tag was unfortunately needed.
Recall the satire articles that later on ended up pretty much being spot on with reality and no longer satire?
Absolutely not true
I actually got into an online argument on a photography forum about that not too long ago. I got called a bigot and transphobe for claiming that a man who "becomes" a woman can't get pregnant. They cited all the "man makes history by becoming pregnant" articles as their proof.
I was told that it is right-wing religious bigots who are trying to cling to outdated concepts like gender being some sort of immutable attribute that people are somehow born with. Modern science is enlightening people these days and they're rising above all these medieval beliefs some of us seem to be stuck in.
Remember the cigarette companies and their bought and paid for scientists?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.