Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RED ALERT: Russia Just did THIS to Its Nuclear Arsenal and It Should Put Us on High Alert
Bad Blue ^ | 10/11/2015 | The Minority Report

Posted on 10/11/2015 7:15:01 AM PDT by conservativejoy

Recent reports indicate Russia is bolstering its arsenal of missiles, submarines and bombers — a move that violates the New START arms treaty. THIS is what we know!

According to the Washington Free Beacon, Russia’s nuclear arsenal how has over 100 nuclear warheads above the limit set by the treaty.

Since the treaty was launched, Russia has deployed 111 new nuclear warheads, bringing its total number of deployed warheads to 1,648. That treaty limit is 1,150 warheads — a number that must be reached in 2018.

Comparatively, the numbers of U.S. nuclear warheads, missiles and bombers have fallen dramatically and are already below the limits set by the treaty. Additionally, the United States has decreased the number of warheads in its deployed nuclear arsenal by 250.

While the United States intends to eliminate heavy bombers and launchers, Russia has launched a strategic nuclear force expansion.

Russian President Vladimir Putin also recently announced a new doctrine that placed priority on nuclear forces.

If this raises concern for you, you are not alone.

Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., chairman of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces, said Russia “is in the business of violating treaties.”

Rogers said Putin has violated several agreements and treaties in the past, and he simply “violates any treaty or agreement that puts limits on capabilities that Mr. Putin and his cronies desire.”

“Russia’s arguable adherence to the New START Treaty just indicates how bad a deal it is for the United States,” he said.

Adm. William Gortney, commander of the U.S. Northern Command, said Wednesday that Russia has read our play book and is “fielding cruise missiles that are very, very accurate, very long range.”

Gortney said these missiles have the ability to reach targets in Canada and the United States. He added that Russia has been participating in war game scenarios recently that simulate cruise missile strikes in Alaska.

This news is serious because it appears Russia has no intention of abiding by New START or any other treaty. We should therefore be building up our military and our arsenals instead of depleting them.

We need to wake up — because this could get ugly real fast.

With this new developing threat in sight…I’m sure Obama will have the perfect plan…like, close the window shades.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: astroturf; iraq; kurdistan; noflyzone; nukes; putin; putinsbuttboys; russia; russianstooges; syria; vladtheimploder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 10/11/2015 7:15:01 AM PDT by conservativejoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

Not a problem. Kerry will get right on it.

After he “fixes” climate change. And makes sure Iran can get its nukes.


2 posted on 10/11/2015 7:16:28 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

The Kenyan is going to get us all killed.


3 posted on 10/11/2015 7:16:54 AM PDT by BigEdLB (Congress will have blood on their hands if anything happens because of the Iran appeasement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy
The MSM will get right on it. [/s]


4 posted on 10/11/2015 7:17:31 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy
It's just Obama being flexible.
5 posted on 10/11/2015 7:18:33 AM PDT by oldbrowser (The kangaroos have taken over the supreme court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

The Russians have always cheated - even at the outset they had SAM missiles with nuclear warheads - we did not, or rather we got rid of ours per the Treaty. This same original treaty helped kill the original Orion Project,


6 posted on 10/11/2015 7:21:43 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

No worries. We’ll just implement a good old fashioned red line, and hit the reset button.

That’ll fix everything.


7 posted on 10/11/2015 7:23:14 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

We need to wake up....

**************
Prolly not gonna happen.


8 posted on 10/11/2015 7:24:59 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

Or go for another “deal” that provides the illusion of compliance. Gotta keep the sheeple believing things are OK don’t you know.


9 posted on 10/11/2015 7:27:48 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

And what are the chances that Obama will even be asked a direct question about this?


10 posted on 10/11/2015 7:29:22 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone
Come on, you all are just being alarmists. Look at it from Oahole's point of view: after the election he would be more flexible. He is just being more flexible now i.e. he is flexing toward declaring victory over the imperialistic capitalistic judeo-christian country he abhors.
11 posted on 10/11/2015 7:33:28 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
And what are the chances that Obama will even be asked a direct question about this?

Pretty dog-gone low...


12 posted on 10/11/2015 7:33:56 AM PDT by null and void (Reality 1, Liberal Academics 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy
From the campaign trail, 2008...

Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs

February 29, 2008 :: News
MissileThreat.com

A video has surfaced of Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama talking on his plans for strategic issues such as nuclear weapons and missile defense.

The full text from the video, as released, reads as follows:

Thanks so much for the Caucus4Priorities, for the great work you've been doing. As president, I will end misguided defense policies and stand with Caucus4Priorities in fighting special interests in Washington.

First, I'll stop spending $9 billion a month in Iraq. I'm the only major candidate who opposed this war from the beginning. And as president I will end it.[i.e. not win it]

Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.

I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.

I will not weaponize space.

I will slow our development of future combat systems.

And I will institute an independent "Defense Priorities Board" to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.

Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert, and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.

You know where I stand. I've fought for open, ethical and accountable government my entire public life. I don't switch positions or make promises that can't be kept. I don't posture on defense policy and I don't take money from federal lobbyists for powerful defense contractors. As president, my sole priority for defense spending will be protecting the American people. Thanks so much.

Article: Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs:

http://web.archive.org/web/20090412030633/http://missilethreat.com/archives/id.7086/detail.asp

"MissileThreat.com is a project of The Claremont Institute devoted to understanding and promoting the requirements for the strategic defense of the United States."


13 posted on 10/11/2015 7:40:00 AM PDT by ETL (So many idiots, not enough time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy
March 2012...

"Obama was talking with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev when neither of them realized that their conversation was being picked up by microphones. Here is what they said:

Obama: “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space.”

Medvedev: “Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you ...”

Obama: “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.”

Medvedev: “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”

“This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” That statement tells us much about the president’s mindset.

The specific mention of missile defense is worrisome enough. Mr. Obama has retreated from the missile defense plan that was negotiated with European allies during the George W. Bush administration. Apparently, he is signaling Moscow that he intends to retreat further. The clear implication from the president’s comments is that he cannot tell the American people before the election what he plans to do after the election.

In addition, there is the phrase “on all these issues,” implying more is at stake than just missile defense.”

Article: Obama plans double cross on missile defense
When it comes to keeping America safe, we shouldn’t be too flexible:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/29/obama-plans-double-cross-on-missile-defense/print/
____________________________________________________

From Investor’s Business Daily, Jan 2012:

Obama To Betray Missile Defense Secrets To Moscow
Investor's Business Daily ^ | January 9, 2012 | IBD staff

Appeasement: From ObamaCare to recess appointments, honoring the Constitution has not been an administration hallmark. But when it comes to betraying secrets to mollify the Russians, it becomes a document the president hides behind.

It was bad enough that the 2012 defense authorization bill signed by President Obama set America on a downward spiral of military mediocrity.

He also issued a signing statement, something he once opposed, saying that language in the bill aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on the U.S. Standard Missile-3 — linchpin of our missile defense — might impinge on his constitutional foreign-policy authority.

Section 1227 of the defense law prohibits spending any funds that would be used to give Russian officials access to sensitive missile-defense technology as part of a cooperation agreement without first sending Congress a report identifying the specific secrets, how they'd be used and steps to protect the data from compromise.

The president is required to certify that any technology shared will not be passed on to third parties such as China, North Korea or Iran, that the Russians will not use transferred secrets to develop countermeasures and that the Russians are reciprocating in sharing missile-defense technology. ..."

“In his signing statement, Obama said he would treat these legal restrictions as “non-binding” and that “my administration will also interpret and implement section 1244 (sic) in a manner that does not interfere with the president’s constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs and avoids the undue disclosure of sensitive diplomatic communications.”

Betraying our secrets is easy for a president who betrayed allies Poland and the Czech Republic to placate Moscow.

Poland was to host ground-based interceptors such as those we’ve deployed in California and Alaska, with missile-tracking radar deployed in the Czech Republic.
mp3Subscribe to the IBD Editorials Podcast

Obama pulled the plug when Moscow objected. Never mind, he said, we have a better approach: a four-phase plan that calls for using three versions of the Navy’s Standard SM-3 interceptor missile that forms the backbone of its Aegis missile-defense system.

The fourth phase consists of a missile still on the drawing board scheduled for deployment by 2020, a version of the SM-3 called the Block IIB. It would intercept hostile missiles in the “early intercept” phase before an enemy missile could release its warheads and decoys. The Russians want the SM-3’s secrets, and Obama appears to be willing to turn them over.

The president wants to save the New Start Treaty, which the Russians have threatened to abandon if we try to fully implement President Reagan’s dream of defeating a nuclear missile attack.

Russia has unilaterally asserted that any qualitative or quantitative improvement in U.S. missile defenses would be grounds for withdrawal from the treaty.

Read More At Investor’s Business Daily:
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/010912-597158-obama-gives-russia-missile-defense-secrets.htm#ixzz3jXmMbVwY

14 posted on 10/11/2015 7:41:48 AM PDT by ETL (So many idiots, not enough time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy
Within a few years America may not be. Thanks to the corrupt communists pig, King Obama, the communists black Muslim terrorists. He has done his job well and with the help of the rest of the useless Federal Government.
15 posted on 10/11/2015 7:41:55 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

What do you expect with bathhouse Barry and Lurch running the show?


16 posted on 10/11/2015 7:41:56 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
17 posted on 10/11/2015 7:42:50 AM PDT by ETL (So many idiots, not enough time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy
From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html
______________________________________________________________

"Joint war games are a logical outcome of the Sino-Russian Friendship and Cooperation Treaty signed in 2001, and reflect the shared worldview and growing economic ties between the two Eastern Hemisphere giants."

http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2005/09/war-games-russia-china-grow-alliance

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,170287,00.html
______________________________________________________________

Sept 11, 2014

China and Russia to build major seaport: report

China and Russia will build one of the largest ports in north-east Asia on Russia’s Sea of Japan coast, reports say, in a further sign of the powerhouses’ growing alliance.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-11/china-and-russia-to-build-major-seaport-report/5738036
______________________________________________________________

Obama: "We Welcome China's Rise"
CBS News ^ | January 19, 2011 | Stephanie Condon
______________________________________________________________

 photo Obama bow Red China_zpsaue3iloo.jpg

18 posted on 10/11/2015 7:45:01 AM PDT by ETL (So many idiots, not enough time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Thanks for all the additional info. Pretty chilling.


19 posted on 10/11/2015 7:46:23 AM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB
The Kenyan is going to get us all killed.

He's not a natural born citizen, but, as a politician _resident, he legislates as a natural born killer, in addition to being a natural born instigator, a natural born divider, a natural born trouble maker and general pita.

God's gift to rebels like US who go their own way?

20 posted on 10/11/2015 7:49:00 AM PDT by GBA (Just a hick in paradise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson