Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

You used that stamp with your boss’ knowledge and consent. Using Mrs Davis stamp without her consent, in fact against her wishes is fraud. Felony fraud.


28 posted on 09/03/2015 7:18:59 PM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: jpsb
That was my point.
32 posted on 09/03/2015 7:23:00 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: jpsb

And it is most important to state something else.

Any gay couple who gets a “license” that is issued this way IS COMPLICIT!

That’s the ultimate.
They are the reason for this deception!
THEY ARE THE PRIME MOVERS!
THEY ARE COMPLICIT!


33 posted on 09/03/2015 7:23:16 PM PDT by djf ("It's not about being nice, it's about being competent!" - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: jpsb

The deputy clerks should just put up a sign on the door saying “Any documents issued with a facsimile of the Clerk’s signature without the Clerk’s express permission should not be considered valid”

And have business cards made up with that same statement that are stapled to any documents stamped with her signature.

The judge opened this particular can of worms, even acknowleging that the risk of invalidity existed.

My recollection is that celebrants can’t perform a marriage without a valid license. Which means that whoever performs the ceremony for them will be open to legal charges as well.


40 posted on 09/03/2015 7:55:19 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson