Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

6 Grammatical Errors That Need to Stop Now
July 09, 2015 | Jonathan Long

Posted on 08/30/2015 10:38:18 AM PDT by B4Ranch

Proper grammar seems to be a thing of the past -- why stress about tiny technicalities, right? Wrong.

You should be a grammar stickler for many reasons. Do you want to risk turning off potential clients, employers and connections because of grammatical mistakes?

Many people are so concerned with what they are saying in an email or text message that they completely forget to pay attention to how they are saying it. If you chose to turn grammar mode off when you are communicating with friends, that is one thing, but there is absolutely no reason to send a professional communication that contains errors.

Here are six grammatical errors that are so simple, yet such common offenders. Make sure you aren’t making them.

1. Your/You’re

This is probably the most common mistake I see on social media, in text messages and in emails. This one is real simple -- if you are trying to say “you are” then “you’re” is correct. If you are talking about something that belongs to you, such as “your car” then you use “your.”

2. Too/To/Two

Many people confuse these and don’t even realize they are doing it. It’s real easy -- “two” is a number, “too” is an adverb that means “also,” and “to” is a preposition used to express motion, direction, limit of movement, contact, a point of limit in time, purpose, intention and destination -- to name a few.

For example:

“I would like to become an entrepreneur.”

“I too would like to become an entrepreneur.”

3.  There/Their/They’re

What should have been squared away in third grade continues to haunt grammar police on a daily basis. The there/their/they’re mistake is common -- but it’s really simple to avoid.

Use “they’re” when you are trying to say “they are.”

“Their” should be used when you are indicating possession.

Finally, “there” needs to be used when referring to a location.

Example: "They're going to love working there. Their company culture is amazing!"

4. You/U

This one is really just pure laziness rather than a grammatical mistake. Texting has completely ruined grammar and you/u is a perfect example. I understand that “u” is perfectly acceptable if you are texting a friend and are in a rush -- but it’s not acceptable in a professional email.

Here is an excerpt of an email I received last week from a C-level executive who is in charge of a company that does business worth several hundreds of millions of dollars every year:

… that would be gr8! Talk to u soon!

He managed to nail two text slangs back to back like a champ. Again, if it was a text message, fine -- but a professional email is no place for this. This email is actually what sparked me to write this article, so thank you grammatically challenged C-level executive.

5. Then/Than

When you are talking about time you use “then” and when you are making a comparison you use “than.” It really shouldn’t be that difficult to distinguish what one to use:

“We are going to grab a quick bite to eat and then head back to the office.”

“This new software update is much better than the previous version.”

6. It’s/Its

This one confuses a lot of people, mainly due to the apostrophe, which typically symbolizes possession. Use “it’s” when you are trying to say “it is” and use “its” when you are looking for the possessive form of “it.”

“I looked at its owners manual to get the correct settings.”

“It’s a beautiful day outside.”

What are some other grammar mishaps that drive you nuts? Share them in the comments section below.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: grammar; spelling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 361-378 next last
To: B4Ranch
Why are you harping on grammar?

She dindu nuffin to you.
141 posted on 08/30/2015 11:40:03 AM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redshawk

thass a dolla wuffa gas.


142 posted on 08/30/2015 11:41:17 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
The most common error I have seen involves possessive/contraction/plural/plural possessive... or do they just shotgun apostrophes on the page?
143 posted on 08/30/2015 11:44:41 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

We need to redouble our grammatical efforts once again. Irregardless of the challenge.


144 posted on 08/30/2015 11:44:47 AM PDT by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Nevah Venny, Nevah!


145 posted on 08/30/2015 11:45:20 AM PDT by Ditter ( God Bless Texas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

While we’re at it, let’s stamp out apostrophe abuse. Use of apostrophe’s to pluralize word’s drives me nut’s!


146 posted on 08/30/2015 11:46:08 AM PDT by j.havenfarm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

The problem with latter day grammar, as well as spelling, is that these subjects are not actually taught in public school so as not to offend minority students or “disrespect” their patois.


147 posted on 08/30/2015 11:46:24 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Eccl 10:2
Would of

Could of

Should of

Wudda, cudda, shudda. Much better!

But when you get right down to it,

"What difference, at this point, does it make?"

148 posted on 08/30/2015 11:47:02 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

that is a sweet dysfunction.


149 posted on 08/30/2015 11:47:40 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
Grammar Nazi’s do that alot...

I'm not informed enough to be a grammar Nazi but there are a couple of grammar issues that annoys me.

Using the word "gender" when referring to human sex such as gender related instead of sex related.

We got married instead of we married or the preacher married us.

Get the second one for free instead of get the second one free.

150 posted on 08/30/2015 11:48:16 AM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, trust few, and always paddle your own canoe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

I agree.

And 2nd the post adding lose/loose.

Never mind definAtely.

Oh, I cannot stand the stupidity!


151 posted on 08/30/2015 11:49:30 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

OK, I have long complied with all six examples.
However, I don’t totally agree with #4. Texting
has helped a new generation to learn to
appreciate the uses of the written word and
how important reading is to the culture.


152 posted on 08/30/2015 11:49:38 AM PDT by Sivad (NorCal red turf ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eartrumpet

Y’all is plural, not singular.


You all is singular.


153 posted on 08/30/2015 11:49:40 AM PDT by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Thank you for the link... it may take me a bit of time to ingrain the differentiation, but one thing is evident, I’ve been watching too many John Kerry speachifyings...

“At its worst, the use of whom becomes a form of one-upmanship some employ to appear sophisticated.”


154 posted on 08/30/2015 11:51:30 AM PDT by This_far (WHAT LAWS DO WE GET TO IGNORE?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

It seems the Vanity Nazis should track you down as a Grammar Nazi...


155 posted on 08/30/2015 11:52:35 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( "Forward lies the crown, and onward is the goal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl
If there were more than one frog.
156 posted on 08/30/2015 11:52:43 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
We live in a post literate culture. Most business owners, employers and potential clients can’t/won’t write any better than the average putz. The age when people of any consequence actually care enough about grammar to hinge job offers or business deals on “The Elements of Style” is long past....

Try reading the gibberish of a legal writ. They are so called professional wordsmiths. Yet no one but a person with a Judicial degree can understand what they are saying. They love words especially ones very seldom if even used even in the history of the nation. Look at out founding documents. Anyone can read them and have a general understanding. Petition a court today and try to understand what the writ says. Good Luck.

Many, if not most persons who built this nation in 1700-early 1900's in fact had poor grammar and penmanship. We survived as a nation. Loved ones who for example saw the last words of a coal miner written in his final hours trapped under ground did not care if poppa spelled correctly. The minority of Americans had the grammar and penmanship skills of today even with errors. Of all the problems and issues we face this is amongst the bottom of the barrel of things destroying our nation.

I'd rather hear the words of a farmers opinion errors and all and certainly know and understand what he is saying than someone who writes in levels so advanced no one understand or would likely even care what they are saying.

Today's grammar by the way is not the grammar the persons that first came to our shores used. That died out in the 1600's. Customs change and so do languages. Even languages based in Latin have a huge variant region to region.

157 posted on 08/30/2015 11:53:06 AM PDT by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph

They use higher energy fuel to further their goal of driving farther.


158 posted on 08/30/2015 11:53:38 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph

Further was ken Kesey’s bus.


159 posted on 08/30/2015 11:54:12 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
How about effect/impact?

160 posted on 08/30/2015 11:58:20 AM PDT by Banjoguy (Start boycotting the airline industry..NOW! Drive everywhere you can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 361-378 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson