After four weeks of chasing the problem and replacing every control part of the EGR system it still won't run right and won't throw a code.
1 posted on
08/07/2015 10:23:55 PM PDT by
Cowman
To: Cowman
They obviously learned their Engineering skills from the Republican National Committee.
2 posted on
08/07/2015 10:26:16 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Cowman
Rant off ... That is all
To be fair, you Do know who bought Chrysler?
4 posted on
08/07/2015 10:28:31 PM PDT by
867V309
(Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
To: Cowman
I had a ‘72 stepside Dodge truck with a 318 and a four speed trans. with a ‘granny’ gear. We pulled stumps with it. That was one tough, reliable truck.
6 posted on
08/07/2015 10:31:02 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: Cowman
I hear ya! I was a line mech at a Chrysler/Plymouth garage in 78/79 and went through the same crap. Used the ‘computer’ that was the size of a battery charger cart and it NEVER gave the same code twice. The service manager said to throw parts at it until it ran halfways right. Maddening!
9 posted on
08/07/2015 10:37:05 PM PDT by
W.
(Get a rope. Now.)
To: Cowman
Trash that engine & put in a slant six!
11 posted on
08/07/2015 10:40:31 PM PDT by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: Cowman
I have worked on both engines in my first career as a mechanic, they are absolutely bullet proof.
12 posted on
08/07/2015 10:46:17 PM PDT by
wjcsux
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: Cowman
Drinking while swinging a wrench will reach the point of diminishing returns after a fashion..........put the Craftsman down, it'll wait until tomorrow. Believe me, been there, done that.
14 posted on
08/07/2015 11:16:25 PM PDT by
Viking2002
(The Avatar is back by popular request.)
To: Cowman
I probably don’t keep up with Chrysler as well as I should, but I have to admit to a serious jones.
I want one of those 707hp Hellcats really bad. The new 666 edition is the stuff young men’s (which I ain’t) dreams are made of.
Just thinking about it makes my right foot itchy.
16 posted on
08/08/2015 12:07:00 AM PDT by
rikkir
(You can lead a horde to knowledge but you can't make them think. (TnkU ctdonath2))
To: Cowman
The EGR valve in a Jeep JK is a bear to replace. Ask me how I know?
25 posted on
08/08/2015 3:01:17 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
To: Cowman
Motortrend had this to say about a JK Rubicon back in 2008:
Additionally, Jeep's Rubicon package uses BFG Mud Terrain T/As, possibly the most aggressive tread available on any factory vehicle. Ultimate low-traction treads, combined with ultimate low-traction mechanicals make the Rubicon package an almost unbeatable team; however, if there is a weak point, it's in the 3.8L cast-iron V-6. The engine only puts out 202 hp and 237 lb-ft of torque but it feels like it's even less than that, even with 4.10:1 ring-and-pinion gears. Although clearly not designed for pavement racing, a 0-to-60 time of almost 9.8 sec puts the Jeep Rubicon right on top of a Toyota Prius.
Especially with 35" tires, my Jeep is not a sportscar. I don't accelerate fast enough for the 2016 Camaro behind me at the traffic light.
Still, I love Jeeps. They are incredible machines, especially the Rubicon.
I guess the engine change is a partial answer to the criticism.
27 posted on
08/08/2015 3:09:57 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
To: Cowman
Why did Ford bump the old 289 and Chevy the 283? Some things will never be known....
30 posted on
08/08/2015 3:45:07 AM PDT by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: Cowman
I am still seething over the $700 control module that was causing my right headlight to not work on my ‘04 RAM. I would like to meet the “engineer” that replaced a simple fuse and relay with a GD computer card and punch them in the face.
32 posted on
08/08/2015 4:25:25 AM PDT by
Rodamala
To: Cowman
Two acronyms explain it CAFE and EPA.
33 posted on
08/08/2015 4:26:48 AM PDT by
VTenigma
(The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
To: Cowman
The 4.7 is a smoking pile of dog$hit. Go to Craigslist and search “mechanics special”. At least one listing will be a low mileage vehicle with a 4.7.
34 posted on
08/08/2015 4:37:13 AM PDT by
mad_as_he$$
(Section 20.)
To: Cowman
I was a dyed int the wool Mopar owner. until I bought a 1996 Chrysler LHS. Overall a decent car that drive well, but it was a true POS or should I say LHS (lousy hunk of s***) the transmission failed at 73K miles just outside the warranty period. When I went to have it repaired I was told that it was not a serviceable part and needed to be replaced. I was livid. Who ever heard of a transmission you can’t repair? I got one from a junk yard and installed it myself (what a production that was) and sold the car a few weeks later.
Never bought another one. I’m a Toyota guy now.
The only work I’ve had to do on my Toyotas is consumables...brakes and tires.
Walk away from the Chryslers.
35 posted on
08/08/2015 5:48:12 AM PDT by
Ouderkirk
(To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
To: Cowman
It’s not just Chrysler but ALL auto makers. Why would Ford abandon the equally good 4.9L I-6 and replace it with a 4.6L V-8 that shoots spark plugs through the hood? In my opinion the inline 6, whether Jeep’s 258, Chrysler’s Slant Six, Ford’s 300 or Chevy’s 250 were the best engines ever made. They lived too long and that was the reason for their demise.
39 posted on
08/08/2015 6:30:50 AM PDT by
762X51
To: Cowman
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson