There is some scriptural support in the Bible for polygamy. There is no support for homosexuality.
Who are we to judge?
Give them all the benefits.
All I can say is that the guy is nuts. Double the chores Double the nagging. Halve the free time. Halve the available funds.
I notice the focus is on the man having two wives when really the focus should be on the bi-sexual woman having both a wife and husband.
That’s what this is all about. Group marriage. Why stop at three? How about two bi-sexual men marrying two bi-sexual woman? The supreme bozo court has successfully destroyed the very definition of marriage.
Poor kids.
That didn’t take long. But he has to be nuts. Imagine getting bitched at in stereo!
And have you noticed all the media stories about racists that show them as just plain folks who pay taxes, lead normal lives, and are happy?
Me neither.
Check back with this “family” in 2 years...
This is why Muslims engage in suicide bombings. It isn’t so much the multiple wives that drive them to it as all those mother in laws.
What’s funny about that article is the polyamory people are probably furious about it.
When a couple wants to explore, the tendency (probably because the guy wants it more) is to seek out another woman. So, they’re looking for a woman who’ll be perfectly happy being subservient in a relationship where the rules are already established. The poly groups refer to this mythical female third partner as a unicorn and it’s a cause for scorn to be searching for one.
Or, as the country song goes, “me and my husband, we need a wife.”
Lol. So a major news network depicts polyamory with a unicorn relationship. Funny and ironic.
The other thing about these kinds of relationships is they spend an inordinate amount of time focused on trust and managing openess. Why? Because it’s an impossibility when you have multiple relationship angles and multiple agendas.
If you don't draw the line, the envelope will keep getting pushed.
Twice as many mamas, what isn’t to like? /sardonic
That’s still better, I suppose, than no mama at all.
“We didn’t want a feminine man, just because we’re both very feminine, so we wanted someone that would hold that role of masculinity,”
That sounds almost... traditional.
It used to be that a man could work and support his wife and 3 or 4 kids. Now it takes a man and 2 wives to support themselves and 2 kids. In the future it’ll take a village of 32 men and 45 women to make enough money to support themselves and 1 kid. The rest of the children will be aborted. Isn’t progress wonderful...!