Skip to comments.
Two pilots killed as Tu-95MS bomber crashes after all 4 engines fail
siberian times ^
| 14 july 2015
| The Siberian Times reporte
Posted on 07/14/2015 10:30:45 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT
Two pilots killed as Tu-95MS bomber crashes after all 4 engines fail
Five crew safely parachuted from stricken jet in latest of spate of accidents afflicting military aircraft.
The accident was the sixth involving Russian military aircraft this summer, reported news agencies. The ministry said the crash was probably caused by a malfunction, although other causes were not ruled out, reported Sputnik News Agency.
(Excerpt) Read more at siberiantimes.com ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: crash; tu95; ussr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: gr8eman
41
posted on
07/14/2015 11:56:11 AM PDT
by
Hulka
To: Rodamala
42
posted on
07/14/2015 12:02:28 PM PDT
by
ex91B10
(We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
To: Uncle Miltie
Good.
One less of those to worry about.
43
posted on
07/14/2015 12:21:23 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: DUMBGRUNT
For all four engines to fail it had to be a fuel problem. Either bad fuel (water in the fuel) or empty fuel tanks. I'll bet on bad fuel. The Tu-95 has been in-service with the Russians since 1956. It is the Russian equivalent to our B-52 Stratofortress that entered service in February 1955.
To: CommerceComet
How about ice crystals in the fuel?
I was deployed to Uzbekistan at an old Soviet air base. The Uzbeks had a few Sukhoi Su-27’s which they would light off before dawn & spool up to full throttle for what seemed like forever before finally rolling for takeoff. Very noisy.
Asked Basops what was gong on & the reply was that Russian jet fuel had no anti-ice additives so the airframes were gotten good & hot before flight to prevent fuel starvation due to ice in the fuel.
45
posted on
07/14/2015 12:44:31 PM PDT
by
elcid1970
("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
To: RayChuang88
There’s an old joke that DEW line folks will hear Tu-95s approaching long before they see them on radar.
46
posted on
07/14/2015 12:47:36 PM PDT
by
elcid1970
("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
To: Drew68
My guess as well, except the article said the fuel valves failed to all engines. Of course we will never know the truth.
47
posted on
07/14/2015 12:54:55 PM PDT
by
USNBandit
(Sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: Rodamala; TruthWillWin
Fuel Boost pump failure. If it even has one:)
To: DUMBGRUNT
50 years isn’t bad. There are older DC3s still flying around from the 30s.
Of course they aren’t maintained by Russians.
49
posted on
07/14/2015 1:02:56 PM PDT
by
Seruzawa
(All those memories will be lost,in time, like tears in rain.)
To: MasterGunner01
For all four engines to fail it had to be a fuel problem. Either bad fuel (water in the fuel) or empty fuel tanks. I'll bet on bad fuel. According to the article, "TASS news agency cited sources saying a failure of the plane's fuel valves led to the failure of all four engines."
50
posted on
07/14/2015 1:21:59 PM PDT
by
cynwoody
To: cynwoody
If the fuel transfer valves are electric and there was an electrical problem, that would point to why the four engines suffered from fuel starvation. My guess is these fuel transfer vales are controlled by the flight engineer.
To: Jagdgewehr
And who do you think may have shot down a Tu-95 in the middle of nowhere, in far eastern Siberia?
52
posted on
07/14/2015 1:37:53 PM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
To: gr8eman
or the fuel was water/contaminate laden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson