Because leaving thousands of combat vehicles and tanks in Iraq worked so well.......
Maybe Europe should defend itself.
Maybe those allies should think about a real army themselves.
Before you count on NATO read this:
As NATO faces a resurgent Russian military, a substantial number of Europeans do not believe that their own countries should rush to defend an ally against attack, according to a comprehensive survey to be made public on Wednesday.
NATO’s charter states that an attack against one member should be considered an attack against all, but the survey points to the challenges the alliance faces in trying to maintain its cohesion in the face of an increasingly aggressive Russia.
“At least half of Germans, French and Italians say their country should not use military force to defend a NATO ally if attacked by Russia,” the Pew Research Center said it found in its survey, which is based on interviews in 10 nations.
what good is weaponry if the Emperor has no backbone?
Just kidding...
5.56mm
The NATO accord seems very one sided anyway. Perhaps it should be retired.
Not only is there no will to defend the weakest of the members, the question for us is whether anyone would come to our aid militarily with the same commitment we would.
I think not.
So we are prepositioning the very first equipment to be targeted?
This is happening as we also need to increase our commitment to Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines, and South Korea to defend those countries; as well as the Middle East.
I suspect that if something does happen, that it will kick off a domino effect and all the hot spots listed will go hot (Asia pacific, Korea, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Latin America).
“”Meanwhile, the Polish Defense Ministry said on June 14 that the country is in talks with the United States about stationing U.S. Army equipment warehouses in Poland.””
But obozo scrapped/dismantled the missle defense system in Poland to placate Russia. Can’t trust or believe one cotton pickin’ thing this administration tells us.
Active Duty ping.