Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are "Transracial" rights the up and coming new thing?
6/13/2015 | Dallas59

Posted on 06/12/2015 10:43:35 PM PDT by Dallas59

If transgender people can do their thing and receive special treatment even when their DNA is 100 percent the opposite of what they want to be, why can't I claim to be Mexican and get special benefits?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: anythinggoes; naacp; racheldolezal; rights; transracial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Dallas59

As a trans-alien who identifies as Klingon, I demand the government pay for my cranial ridge implants.

Now bring me some bloodwine, you Peta’Q!

:)


21 posted on 06/12/2015 11:13:58 PM PDT by DemforBush (Ex-Democrat, and NotforJeb. Just so we're clear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

22 posted on 06/12/2015 11:16:29 PM PDT by Dallas59 (Only a fool stumbles on things behind him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

LUMBA!


23 posted on 06/12/2015 11:18:38 PM PDT by Crazieman (Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

LOL!

Best. Comeback. EVAH.


24 posted on 06/12/2015 11:18:46 PM PDT by DemforBush (Ex-Democrat, and NotforJeb. Just so we're clear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Catmom
'At the rate things are going who in their right mind wants to be white any more?'

Me. I am the whitest man alive. In fact, I have no melanin whatsoever. I am the Uber-Honkey!


25 posted on 06/12/2015 11:43:42 PM PDT by Viking2002 (The Avatar is back by popular request.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59; All
I posed this question:

I’m wondering if there’s even a law governing which category you must check. Is anyone ever asked to provide evidence?

Then I found this case...

These firefighters got into trouble with the law for falsely identifying their "race." They were asked to show evidence:

Malone v. Haley

26 posted on 06/12/2015 11:45:57 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Catmom

We will be the real rebels.


27 posted on 06/12/2015 11:57:19 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
I'm planning to marry someone
who doesn't want to marry me.

I see myself with a second income.
That's just who I am.

28 posted on 06/12/2015 11:59:10 PM PDT by donna (Polls are mob rule . . . faked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

I identify as a Trans-Am on Fridays during cheerleader charity carwashes


29 posted on 06/13/2015 12:12:12 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
“Individuals are placed into categories according to the perceptions of their racial or ethnic identity held by a designated decision-making third party. An individual's membership in a particular group might thus be determined according either to:

I always tick the "Other" box when filling out a form since, short of a genetic test, I really have no way of knowing or proving who my ancestors slept with or were raped by. But according to this legal opinion, apparently I now have to check with others in the "Other" category to see if they consider me part of their group.

I wonder if liberals ever consider how silly all of their contortions look to rational people.

30 posted on 06/13/2015 12:29:12 AM PDT by PressurePoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PressurePoint

Oh come on, liberals, consider AND rational all in the same short sentence ??? The answer is not just no, it’s HELL NO !


31 posted on 06/13/2015 12:46:44 AM PDT by snooter55 (People may doubt what you say, but they will always believe what you do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
Thanks for the hyperlink!

[...] the employer-submitted EEO information is grounded in the subjective assessments of individual personnel administrators - who are not, one might suspect, entirely disinterested in the outcome - about whether an employee, for example, "looks Black" or "seems Hispanic." This information is judged against self-reported MSA data. This mechanism, which juxtaposes the apples of self-reported race and ethnicity with the oranges of stereotyped group ascription, is the foundation of federal EEO enforcement. [...]

Heady stuff!

And funny how, in the same paper, "gender" is considered to be much easier to categorize.

Regards,

32 posted on 06/13/2015 1:40:33 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PressurePoint

We all should start our own group, known as “Other.” ;-)

Some sources say “Other” is for “race unknown.” But probably most people could make that claim. My ancestors hail from the Mediterranean. Our family looks like we cover the gamut, and our surname sounds ambiguous.

If enough people argued about which category they fit into, maybe the gov’t would drop the categories.

Maybe Ms. Dolezal is on to something. LOL.


33 posted on 06/13/2015 1:47:37 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
And funny how, in the same paper, "gender" is considered to be much easier to categorize.

Uh-oh. Good catch. I didn't notice that.

Copied from the text:

In drawing distinctions between individual human beings, certain tasks are easier than others. In the context of "affirmative action" and other preferential programs, the easiest differentiating principle to discuss or administer is sex. In this area, human beings come only in two biological flavors, each fairly easily distinguished by a characteristic chromosomal pattern of XX (female) or XY (male). Chromosome sets such as XXY can occur, but they are quite rare. For the most part, the male/female dichotomy is one of conceptual clarity.

I just noticed the paper was published in 1994. Wow. By today's standards, the writer would be a "right-wing bigot." LOL.

34 posted on 06/13/2015 1:59:05 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
ANGLOSPHERE'S SPECTACULAR COLLAPSE [Bad Language]

The Sewer of Europe And The Western World

35 posted on 06/13/2015 2:04:46 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

36 posted on 06/13/2015 2:05:57 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
I just noticed the paper was published in 1994. Wow. By today's standards, the writer would be a "right-wing bigot."

I like the cut of your jib!

Yes, it's amazing what revolution in mores and cultural norms has taken place in the span of a scant twenty years!

Regards,

37 posted on 06/13/2015 2:10:10 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PressurePoint

In 1913 one Sicilian brother immigrates to NYC, another to Buenos Aires.

Both raise families and their offspring always married within the Italian ethny.

102 years later, a BA cousin immigrates to NYC and moves in with one of his distant cousins.

The BA cousin, despite identical ancestry and appearance, is considered Hispanic and eligible for all the perks, while his NYC cousin is simply a boring old white guy.


38 posted on 06/13/2015 2:24:38 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Now you know why the category is “Hispanic” and not “Latin”. Latin covers a whole broader spectrum, including most Italian, some French and a few Romanians.


39 posted on 06/13/2015 2:35:24 AM PDT by j.argese (/s tags: If you have a mind unnecessary. If you're a cretin it really doesn't matter, does it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: j.argese

Actually, if there were any logic to it, “Latino” would cover Brazilians, Portuguese, French, Haitians, Italians, Romanians, some Belgians, some Swiss, as well as all the “Hispanics.” Among others.

There is not, of course, any logic to it.


40 posted on 06/13/2015 2:44:00 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson