Posted on 06/03/2015 9:47:35 AM PDT by C19fan
Josh Duggar confessed to his father Jim Bob Duggar on THREE separate occasions to multiple acts of sexual molestation against his sisters and a family friend, according to a new police report obtained exclusively by In Touch magazine.
The document also makes clear that Josh was 15 years old when he molested his 5-year-old sister and committed at least SEVEN acts of sexual molestation.
(Excerpt) Read more at intouchweekly.com ...
Their whole show has always been saturated with sexual innuendo. They claim "modesty" on one hand while they expose their very young children to a constant barrage of talk about sex.
At a young age their pre-pubescent daughters were held responsible for warning their 1 older brother, all the younger ones and even their father when an "immodestly" dressed woman came into their field of vision.
Why did they ever think their young daughters needed to be held responsible for where their father's prurient interest might lie?
C) I find the family very cultish and thought strange how the mom kept staring at the dad as he spoke.
Yep. They are Gothardites.
Another thing that bothers me is how Jim Bob and Michelle lied on TV last night. They contradicted their original testimony so many times it made my head spin.
When their 15 year old son molested the 5 year old it was under her clothes. She was awake. she was on his lap while he read her a book! She knew what happened. It was also listed on the police report as a felony of a worse degree than the molestations of the girls who were ages 7-12.
Why go on national TV and lie to America? Why say that the daughters you made responsible for your lustful eyes in public weren't actually disturbed by being molested because they didn't "know what it was?"
Jim Bob, when the molested 5 year old was 7, you had her holding a towel over the TV so that her brothers wouldn't be defrauded by seeing a news reporters knees!
The police report shows from the testimony of the victims that they were vaginally molested unlike Jim Bob's repeated claim that Josh only touched a breast "over clothes" because he was just curious about girls. They testimony of the victims at that time showed they were still in emotional pain from what had happened to them and they DID KNOW.
So, if the records were sealed and the police refused to release information concerning the rumored molestation of young girls in the Duggar household, would this story be any better?
I think it would be worse.
You addressed this to me so I will answer.
The little Duggar girls understand modesty....
that’s why they warn their dad if someone is inappropriate.
My granddaughter has a well developed sense of modetsty......and will tell us when someone is inappropriately displaying themselves,
This is refreshing and affirming.
Thanks for noting the lies told by those folks last night.
I am not in favor of what the boy did. But I am in favor of appropriate perspective. These calls for ruining him and so forth are harder on the victims than the mild degree of abuse they experienced.
I totally agree. I think they told as much of the truth as they are humanly capable of handling at this time, given that they are being dragged through the mud gleefully by people who are spouting the exact opposite of truth about Christianity. Christians strive to live moral lives, but cannot truly live as Christians unless they understand that sin is part of that life, it is unavoidable in every life, and that one must be able to admit to it and keep on going, keep on relying in faith on the promises of God that He is refining one's character, sometimes through humiliation.
I do believe this was an agenda-driven attack on them, but I also pray that they will be able to withstand it, and that none of their children will be destroyed by it. The media is trying very hard to ruin them, obviously without a care as to the feelings of the girls involved, or especially the young children.
If you are male and have trained your little granddaughter to be in charge of your lustfull eyes, I find that extremely distasteful.
Same if you are a female who is hyper-sexualizing a young granddaughter.
Thanks for that!
If this is how you truly think, it is sad.....very sad.
....and I feel sorry for you.
I have no apologies at all for believing that it is very wrong for the Duggars to sexualize children. Wrong for ANYONE.
I think he needs to be monitored
The parents need to be punished severely for allowing him back over and over (by their count, three times).
They failed their children - all of them - even the child molester - over and over and over. They had a serious, deep sickness in their family and instead of doing what they could, they shoved their kids onto the stage for CA$H money.
They sold their children to the media. They did not protect their daughters and did not help their son twice, when he.came to them.
Excuse it any way you want to.
Well you should apologize at the swipe you took at my sweet little granddaughter..........!
I have no more to say to you.
And you are aware that parents are not mandated reporters of their children in this instance?
And you are aware that women and girls are not so very fragile that they must ruin a man's life and throw their brother or parents into prison because someone touched their boob or cootch through their clothes? That they can recover from that, and that it's different from a forcible penetrative rape, right?
(I'm speaking as a woman and a mother who encountered quite a few instances of "bad touch" in school and in the workplace in the 60s and 70s before sex harassment laws were put in place, and survived it well, thank you.)
And you are aware that Lena Dunham inserted objects into her 3-year-old sister's vagina and wrote about it in her book, calling herself a pedophile, and the media merely shrugged, right?
Please explain how they have "sexualized" children by giving them a role model that sex belongs in marriage and sex and marriage are intended for procreation.
The term "sexualizing children" has to do with encouraging children to feel entitled to recreational sex with any type of person and in any circumstances outside of marriage, and to parade their sexual selves to all comers by the way they dress and talk; also to introduce the idea of pansexuality to them at a very young age — whereas the Duggars should be regarded more like a farm family. Do farmers "sexualize" children when their children observe all the animals mating, and they learn about breeding as part of good farm management?
Bodleian Girl...I said I had no more to say to you .....or to some others who post here.....
But perhaps some of you had trauma in childhood and you feel broken..(& as John Piper says, we are ALL broken)...and can’t understand how a little ten year old would be sensitive to her beloved granfather to alert him if someone was dressed inappropriately.
That’s the way she rolls.....she’s a modest little girl.
No one shames her or humiliates her.....This IS her thinking.
I’m sad you don’t get this or understand how it can be.
I responded in anger because this is my precious and only little one.
You may never apologize, but this is how it is.
When these children, especially the little girls, are made responsible from protecting their own father from being sexually aroused in public, the Duggar’s have hyper-sexualized their innocent children.
People, what is wrong with you that you would ever believe that your little girl is responsible for Daddy not getting aroused in public or ANYWHERE?
You must be very young. Maybe you went to a Marxist university. Girls being responsible not to behave in ways that arouse men was standard American Christian teaching until the 80s or so. Many of us grew up with a standard of modesty that was very helpful as we entered the business world in the 70s and 80s and had to interact with strange men, many of whom were hostile and/or horny. As previously noted, there were no sexual harassment laws; society had taught people what decent values were, and that was all you had to go on.
By the same token, men were taught chivalric values of honoring women and being courteous to them, including opening doors for them or helping carry extremely heavy objects. Today is it more likely to see a mother struggling with two toddlers and a heavy grocery cart while her latest boyfriend strides ahead, or waits by the car impatient for her to catch up, or an old or pregnant woman hanging on a strap in the aisle of a bus while able-bodied persons of both sexes lounge in their seats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.