Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Albion Wilde

When these children, especially the little girls, are made responsible from protecting their own father from being sexually aroused in public, the Duggar’s have hyper-sexualized their innocent children.

People, what is wrong with you that you would ever believe that your little girl is responsible for Daddy not getting aroused in public or ANYWHERE?


99 posted on 06/05/2015 10:04:18 AM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Before Bruce Jenner there was Mike Penner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: Bodleian_Girl

You must be very young. Maybe you went to a Marxist university. Girls being responsible not to behave in ways that arouse men was standard American Christian teaching until the 80s or so. Many of us grew up with a standard of modesty that was very helpful as we entered the business world in the 70s and 80s and had to interact with strange men, many of whom were hostile and/or horny. As previously noted, there were no sexual harassment laws; society had taught people what decent values were, and that was all you had to go on.

By the same token, men were taught chivalric values of honoring women and being courteous to them, including opening doors for them or helping carry extremely heavy objects. Today is it more likely to see a mother struggling with two toddlers and a heavy grocery cart while her latest boyfriend strides ahead, or waits by the car impatient for her to catch up, or an old or pregnant woman hanging on a strap in the aisle of a bus while able-bodied persons of both sexes lounge in their seats.


100 posted on 06/05/2015 10:52:10 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("We've seen this before. There's a master race. Now there's a master faith." Benjamin Netanyahu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson