Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bodleian_Girl
I have no apologies at all for believing that it is very wrong for the Duggars to sexualize children.

Please explain how they have "sexualized" children by giving them a role model that sex belongs in marriage and sex and marriage are intended for procreation.

The term "sexualizing children" has to do with encouraging children to feel entitled to recreational sex with any type of person and in any circumstances outside of marriage, and to parade their sexual selves to all comers by the way they dress and talk; also to introduce the idea of pansexuality to them at a very young age — whereas the Duggars should be regarded more like a farm family. Do farmers "sexualize" children when their children observe all the animals mating, and they learn about breeding as part of good farm management?

96 posted on 06/05/2015 7:50:15 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (The "legacy of slavery" is not an excuse for inexcusable behavior. --Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Albion Wilde

When these children, especially the little girls, are made responsible from protecting their own father from being sexually aroused in public, the Duggar’s have hyper-sexualized their innocent children.

People, what is wrong with you that you would ever believe that your little girl is responsible for Daddy not getting aroused in public or ANYWHERE?


99 posted on 06/05/2015 10:04:18 AM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Before Bruce Jenner there was Mike Penner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson