Posted on 03/27/2015 9:11:07 AM PDT by Baynative
MSNBC correspondent Jeremy Lancaster sat down with government official Darrin Cornia to discuss recent rumors that have been in circulation in regard to registered motorcycle owners being placed on a classified FBI gang list.
After a few moments of introduction, Lancaster bluntly asked the following question, Mr. Cornia, if I were to make the statement, all registered motorcycle owners are currently showing on a classified FBI gang list, would the statement be true or false?
Cornia responded by saying, That would be a true statement, the FBI has been collecting and compiling Department of Motor Vehicles and Drivers License Division records for the purpose of adding those that own motorcycles to a classified gang list since 1994.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com.co ...
How I missed the .co....after the dot com...in that articles washington post domain address I dont know
I looked all over the website and I could see no indicator on the site of it being a hoax site. I looked for any link saying so and I couldn’t find it. Is there a page they have that says that?
Yep ... quite true ... I think that Snopes is actually a HOAX SITE!
Yup, if you roll up on a BMW you get a completely different reaction. It’s all those bad boy movies I guess.
Good luck finding a LINK to their legal "disclaimer" (which I only managed to find by searching for the terms contained within).
http://nationalreport.net/disclaimer/
Disclaimer
National Report is a news and political satire web publication, which may or may not use real names, often in semi-real or mostly fictitious ways. All news articles contained within National Report are fiction, and presumably fake news. Any resemblance to the truth is purely coincidental. Advice given is NOT to be construed as professional. If you are in need of professional help, please consult a professional. National Report is not intended for children under the age of 18.
If he didn’t have that raked girl’s top tube, he could fall off the seat and hurt his vagina.
are all car owners classified as rum runners? and all boat owners classified as drug smugglers too then?
Aha! ... so they hide it real good, huh?!
FReeper Motorcycle Hooligans |
|
Visit the FMH Swag Store & support FR! | |
Send FReepmail if you want on/off FMH list | |
The List of Ping Lists |
Hondells “Little Honda”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwWaPOlzWnI
I’m gonna’ wake you up early cause I’m gonna’ take a ride with you.
We’re goin’ down to the Honda shop, I’ll tell you what we’re gonna’ do.
Put on a ragged sweatshirt, I’ll take you anywhere you want me to.
First gear, it’s all right (Honda, Honda, go faster, faster)
Second gear, I’ll lean right (Honda, Honda, go faster, faster)
Third gear, hang on tight (Honda, Honda, go faster, faster)
Faster, it’s all right.
It’s not a big motorcycle, just a groovy little motorbike.
It’s more fun than a barrel of monkeys, that two-wheeled bike.
We’ll ride on out of the town to anyplace I know you’ll like.
It climbs the hills like a Matchless, cause my Honda’s built really light.
When I go into the turns better hang on tight.
I’d better turn on the lights so we can ride my Honda tonight.
I’m less interested in the story than that it’s Ok to create a fake domain and not link back to the original or at least state itself that it is satire in its ‘About’ content.
If I had oodles of spare time on my hands (I work for a living) I would be having ALL sorts of fun with that, creating fake domains and writing satire on all things fun to make fun of libs/progs...
Also, IMHO, this should NOT be excerpted and driving traffic to the fake domain.
Like I said when I asked the mods to take it down; "I was fooled". But, as with any posting how would you not excerpt a quote taken from the article an an excerpt? That's just typical practice as far as I know. If there's a protocol on this, I'll be glad to learn.
In the past, I've been busted immediately for posting a prohibited image (Getty, I think). Whatever alarm tells mods when that happens might be used to detect and squash a .co website, no? I didn't even know these things existed.
Yep the article I posted (erroneously) was a hoax about remains of a viking boat being found along the Mississippi.
This kind of site also manufactures hoaxes about politicians.
Plenty on Facebook and other sites never uncover that it’s fraud. The name isn’t as obvious (yet) as Weekly World News would be.
theyre pretending to be the washignton post
the address however is not that OF the washington post
the WAPO domain is a dot com domain
this sites domain name and therefore their address contained washington post.com...followed by the .co...domain “signifier
I looked over this site (given in the original posting) but I saw nowhere ... where they were pretending to be the Washington Post!
AND FURTHERMORE ... I see they got it from another website, not from the Washington Post!
the address where the article was located IS:
now whether they are legally spoofing the washington post or not may be irrelevant to this discussion but the address is not.
That’s an address from the top level domaim of COLOMBIA!
If the Washington Post was concerned about that particular address showing up in a top level domain in Colombia, they could have picked it up long ago. In fact, they can pick it up right now if they want to ... LOL ... but they have chosen not to pick it up.
Therefore, if they’re it concerned about it, neither am I ... :-) ...
My only concern about it was that I got Stung with the parody...never even noticing how un Washington Post like the page the article was on appeared.
smart of them not to have spoofed the look of that site as well as the name...
Wasn’t berating you.
Frankly, I’d have missed that it was satire and done the same. Didn’t see your request, but I would concur they should remove the link at least.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.