Take your 10 bucks and your Kum-by-ya Muzzie outreach crap and beat it, toots.
Posted on 01/26/2015 10:56:06 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
"I know as Miss USA I can always spread a message of hope and love and peace, and I would do my very best to spread that message to them and everyone else in the world."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Just a typical MISS message. They are programmed to say fluffy flowery inane things like that. Imagine if one said “I think the violent subhuman savages are awful and should not be allowed in our country” she would never win the prize and would be hounded, harassed and intimidated until she never said anything again.
Of course. The 7th century savages couldn’t have their women enjoying sex. No, every sexual encounter with a Muslim male must be a painful and unenjoyable as rape.
lopped,lobbed,choped off, point was made.Guess I got an F don’t give a crap
At best her answer is stupidly and dangerously naive.
Most excellent point!
Take your 10 bucks and your Kum-by-ya Muzzie outreach crap and beat it, toots.
Miss USA is a cutie, pity she has such an empty head...
i a sure the jihadis would love to spread something else....
There was no way she was going to tell them to F*&^ O$$. This is the pageant system. “What is your goal?” “World peace and my own apartment” is the running joke. My daughter participated in it. All answers have to be politically correct. She couldn’t give a true answer even though the people would have loved it. If she had spoken her mind, she wouldn’t have made it into the top 15, let along the top 5.
She’s probably been dating John “You Have a Friend” Kerry.
Check out graphic at # 17.
.
LOL!
Know Thy Enemy
JAKUB GRYGIEL
The modern Western penchant for trusting in the equal rationality of all is strategic folly. Aeschylus understood this well.
Good strategy requires a sound understanding of one’s rivals. A rival in any walk of life is, in a sense, an interlocutor. To engage him effectively in debate one must understand his speech and reasoning patterns. Without that knowledge, conversation is at best pointless, at worst self-defeating. So it is in strategy. It is futile to engage in competition with a rival power without having at least an inkling about his thoughts, fears, and desires.
The modern Western penchant for trusting in the equal rationality of all suggests otherwise. According to this conceit, there is no reason to plumb the nature of an enemy’s thinking because it is no different in essence from one’s own. But this is wrong. A rival’s response to one’s strategy is not predictable as a simply rational and universal reaction that can be generalized and grasped with relative ease. Rival states or groups respond to similar actions in different ways based on their culture, worldview, history, and the proclivities of their leaders. Good strategy, as Bernard Brodie once put it, “presupposes good anthropology and good sociology.”
One of the earliest examples we have of “good anthropology”—or rather, of being able to put oneself in the mind of the enemy—is in a 5th-century BCE Greek tragedy, The Persians, written by Aeschylus. ...
http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/01/23/know-thy-enemy/
I don’t know how to post click link but you must check this out for dumbest answer at the pageant. You won’t believe this, just wow: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww
filty lowlife scumbag gutterwhore idiot alert..............
...uh...er...what?, I'm sorry, did she say something?
All anyone has to do is recall what happened to Carrie Prejean when she answered an OPINIONATED question with her OPINION.
Some homo cross dresser damn near came out of his skirt and the rest, as they say is history.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
