To: eastforker
“sometimes described as a fish “fossil” that dates back 80 million years”
On second thought, he probably doesn’t taste all that good. Does anyone question why this particular shark didn’t “evolve” over that “80 million years”?
3 posted on
01/22/2015 6:52:16 AM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: MrB
shhhh....You wanta wreck that evolution thing that we were apes....
To: MrB
“why this particular shark didn’t “evolve” over that “80 million years?”
Maybe it’s muslim. :)
12 posted on
01/22/2015 7:03:32 AM PST by
V_TWIN
To: MrB
Does anyone question why this particular shark didn’t “evolve” over that “80 million years”?Maybe because it's 'environment' didn't change ?
14 posted on
01/22/2015 7:04:27 AM PST by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: MrB
I betcha the Orientals would line up to eat it....
15 posted on
01/22/2015 7:05:30 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson