Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK

But, it is what it is regardless, still science.


No it isn’t science any more. Things have changed. The use of statistics instead of common sense, the have to find something new instead of adding one more small bit of truth, the lack of accountability in research, the politics, the “social sciences”, the funding sources, the focusing on details instead of systems, the involvement of government, etc.

And mostly the lack of thinking skills and lack of understanding of the scientific method. I have presented challenging information to a professor in electrical engineering and his response to me was, “Why would anyone risk their career on something that isn’t true.” That is their touchstone for the truth.

In short, the willingness to believe anything without questioning.


65 posted on 12/26/2014 8:21:23 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: PeterPrinciple

>>I have presented challenging information to a professor in electrical engineering and his response to me was, “Why would anyone risk their career on something that isn’t true.”<<

Oh, we GOTS TO know! What was this “challenging information?”

(begin bated breath)


68 posted on 12/26/2014 8:34:12 AM PST by freedumb2003 (AGW: Settled Science? If so, there would only be one model and it would agree with measurements)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: PeterPrinciple; kjam22; freedumb2003; ClearCase_guy; SunkenCiv; Busko
PeterPrinciple: "No it isn’t science any more.
Things have changed."

In fact, evolution-theory has been a key part of natural-sciences for over 150 years -- so nothing there has changed, except of course that we now know orders of magnitude more about it than, for example, Charles Darwin did.

PeterPrinciple: "I have presented challenging information to a professor in electrical engineering and his response to me was, 'Why would anyone risk their career on something that isn’t true.'. "

I take it that you assaulted your poor engineering professor with some carefully packaged anti-evolution arguments -- and you're surprised to see he didn't take your bait?
FRiend, if you want to test out your anti-evo arguments, come here -- that's what Free Republic is for, a public service, no extra charge (but please contribute monthly).
Don't expect your hapless professors to deal with such challenges.

We, of course, are not intimidated by your nonsense, and are happy to set you straight.

76 posted on 12/26/2014 10:09:19 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson