But, it is what it is regardless, still science.
And mostly the lack of thinking skills and lack of understanding of the scientific method. I have presented challenging information to a professor in electrical engineering and his response to me was, “Why would anyone risk their career on something that isn’t true.” That is their touchstone for the truth.
In short, the willingness to believe anything without questioning.
>>I have presented challenging information to a professor in electrical engineering and his response to me was, Why would anyone risk their career on something that isnt true.<<
Oh, we GOTS TO know! What was this “challenging information?”
(begin bated breath)
In fact, evolution-theory has been a key part of natural-sciences for over 150 years -- so nothing there has changed, except of course that we now know orders of magnitude more about it than, for example, Charles Darwin did.
PeterPrinciple: "I have presented challenging information to a professor in electrical engineering and his response to me was, 'Why would anyone risk their career on something that isnt true.'. "
I take it that you assaulted your poor engineering professor with some carefully packaged anti-evolution arguments -- and you're surprised to see he didn't take your bait?
FRiend, if you want to test out your anti-evo arguments, come here -- that's what Free Republic is for, a public service, no extra charge (but please contribute monthly).
Don't expect your hapless professors to deal with such challenges.
We, of course, are not intimidated by your nonsense, and are happy to set you straight.