Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PeterPrinciple; kjam22; freedumb2003; ClearCase_guy; SunkenCiv; Busko
PeterPrinciple: "No it isn’t science any more.
Things have changed."

In fact, evolution-theory has been a key part of natural-sciences for over 150 years -- so nothing there has changed, except of course that we now know orders of magnitude more about it than, for example, Charles Darwin did.

PeterPrinciple: "I have presented challenging information to a professor in electrical engineering and his response to me was, 'Why would anyone risk their career on something that isn’t true.'. "

I take it that you assaulted your poor engineering professor with some carefully packaged anti-evolution arguments -- and you're surprised to see he didn't take your bait?
FRiend, if you want to test out your anti-evo arguments, come here -- that's what Free Republic is for, a public service, no extra charge (but please contribute monthly).
Don't expect your hapless professors to deal with such challenges.

We, of course, are not intimidated by your nonsense, and are happy to set you straight.

76 posted on 12/26/2014 10:09:19 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

Acrually, it isn’t.

Many scientists were booted for discussions of this nature.

I pop in, make sure lurkers know we have people who know science, then pop out.

As I am doing now.


81 posted on 12/26/2014 2:27:34 PM PST by freedumb2003 (AGW: Settled Science? If so, there would only be one model and it would agree with measurements)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson